Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 28 power to make ordinances Page 4 of about 1,924 results (0.291 seconds)

United States Dept. of Agriculture Vs. Murry

Court : US Supreme Court

..... process clause of the fourteenth amendment, a connecticut statute establishing a permanent, conclusive presumption of nonresidency for purposes of qualifying for reduced tuition rates at a state university. vlandis v. kline, 412 u. s. 441 . as we said in that case: "in sum, since connecticut purports to be concerned with residency ..... very important and the governmental interest can be promoted without much difficulty by a well designed hearing procedure, the due process clause requires the government to act on an individualized basis, with general propositions serving only as rebuttable presumptions or other burden-shifting devices. that, i think, is the import of stanley ..... by appellants, to persons who contend that they were not validly claimed as dependents. mr. justice blackmun, dissenting. section 5(b) of the food stamp act, which the court today holds unconstitutional, is not happily drafted. and surely is not the kind of statute that attracts sympathetic review. its purposes, however, .....

Bob Jones Univ. Vs. Simon

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 7, 1974 decided may 15, 1974 416 u.s. 725 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit syllabus petitioner, a private university, was notified by the internal revenue service (irs), pursuant to a newly announced policy of denying tax-exempt status for private schools with racially discriminatory admissions policies ..... act is said to be inapplicable because the case does not truly involve taxes. we disagree. the service bases its ..... of its implications, this case falls within the literal scope and the purposes of the act. petitioner further contends that the service's actions do not represent an effort to protect the revenues, but an attempt to regulate the admissions policies of private universities. under this line of argument, the anti-injunction page 416 u. s. 740 .....

Gnct of Delhi and ors Vs. Rais-ur-rehman

Court : Delhi

..... as per clause-c of section 16 of the tibbia college act 1952.2. the board, with the sanction of the lt.governor of delhi, made applicable pay scales as notified by university grant commission for teaching and non-teaching staff of the central universities with effect from january 01, 1986 and also adopted the various ..... merit promotion schemes notified by university grant commission.3. due to malfunctioning by the board, on may 01, 1998, the government of nct of delhi superseded the board and took over the management of the college. the delhi tibbia college (takeover) act, 1998 was simultaneously promulgated and with respect to the ..... supplementary rules. this became the contract of takeover or the terms of the takeover. we find that the respondents have not challenged section 7 of the takeover act as amended.16. fundamental principles of jurisprudence applicable to service law have been overlooked by the tribunal warranting corrective action to be taken, which we do, .....

Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors Vs. Dr. Yousuf Jamal

Court : Delhi

..... as per clause-c of section 16 of the tibbia college act 1952.2. the board, with the sanction of the lt.governor of delhi, made applicable pay scales as notified by university grant commission for teaching and non-teaching staff of the central universities with effect from january 01, 1986 and also adopted the various ..... merit promotion schemes notified by university grant commission.3. due to malfunctioning by the board, on may 01, 1998, the government of nct of delhi superseded the board and took over the management of the college. the delhi tibbia college (takeover) act, 1998 was simultaneously promulgated and with respect to the ..... supplementary rules. this became the contract of takeover or the terms of the takeover. we find that the respondents have not challenged section 7 of the takeover act as amended.16. fundamental principles of jurisprudence applicable to service law have been overlooked by the tribunal warranting corrective action to be taken, which we do, .....

Gnct Delhi and ors Vs. Rajni Sushma

Court : Delhi

..... as per clause-c of section 16 of the tibbia college act 1952.2. the board, with the sanction of the lt.governor of delhi, made applicable pay scales as notified by university grant commission for teaching and non-teaching staff of the central universities with effect from january 01, 1986 and also adopted the various ..... merit promotion schemes notified by university grant commission.3. due to malfunctioning by the board, on may 01, 1998, the government of nct of delhi superseded the board and took over the management of the college. the delhi tibbia college (takeover) act, 1998 was simultaneously promulgated and with respect to the ..... supplementary rules. this became the contract of takeover or the terms of the takeover. we find that the respondents have not challenged section 7 of the takeover act as amended.16. fundamental principles of jurisprudence applicable to service law have been overlooked by the tribunal warranting corrective action to be taken, which we do, .....

Rudolph Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... meeting of the american bar association; to a legal secretary attending the national convention of the national association; to physicians attending medical conventions; to certified public accountants attending conventions; to university teachers in attending conventions or scientific meetings; to professional cartoonists attending political conventions; to persons attending the red cross convention; to school teachers attending summer school; to attorneys attending an ..... congress, not for the court. the test of deductibility to be applied here is whether the expenses are "ordinary and necessary" in the carrying on of petitioner's business. the act is explicit in permitting the deduction of traveling expenses (including the page 370 u.s. 269, 281 entire amount expended for meals and lodging) while away from home in the .....

Rudolph Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... meeting of the american bar association; to a legal secretary attending the national convention of the national association; to physicians attending medical conventions; to certified public accountants attending conventions; to university teachers in attending conventions or scientific meetings; to professional cartoonists attending political conventions; to persons attending the red cross convention; to school teachers attending summer school; to attorneys attending an ..... congress, not for the court. the test of deductibility to be applied here is whether the expenses are "ordinary and necessary" in the carrying on of petitioner's business. the act is explicit in permitting the deduction of traveling expenses (including the page 372 u. s. 281 entire amount expended for meals and lodging) while away from home in the "pursuit .....

Maryland Vs. Louisiana

Court : US Supreme Court

..... already been so minimized." w. hellerstein, state taxation in the federal system: perspectives on louisiana's first use tax on natural gas, shell foundation lecture at tulane university school of law (nov. 20, 1980), pp. 23-24. [ footnote 29 ] of course, 1303c itself may result in substantial discrimination, since owners of ..... exercise such power would adversely affect the price which the government could command from private developers in their bid price. as clearly required by the ocs act, louisiana's sovereign interest in the development of offshore mineral interests stops at its 3-mile border. louisiana, however, presses certain environmental interests as well ..... including sale, processing, transportation, use in manufacturing, treatment, or "other ascertainable action at a point within the state." 1302(8). [ footnote 8 ] the act itself, as well as provisions found elsewhere in the state statutes, provided a number of exemptions from and credits for the first-use tax. the severance tax .....

Sandvik Asia Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1985)14ITD35(Mum.)

..... learned counsel has referred to several authorities. the indian edition 1976 of managerial economics by joel dean of graduate school of business, columbia university, gives the following : last in first out (lifo) inventory accounting can, in periods of inflation, help approximate contemporary dollar earnings. ..... and legality of the assessment. 3. disallowance of surtax liability and the expenses disallowed under section 40a(5) of the income-tax act, 1961 ('the act').2. the assessee-company manufactures various tungsten carbide products such as tips, dyes, nibs, drill steels, cutters, etc. the ..... lifo method is not acceptable. however, this can be said to be an author's view but there is nothing in the act that lifo method is totally banned. j.batty has observed as under :--------------------------------------------------------------------------------method of pricing brief definition base of likely--------------------------------------------------------------------------------last in .....

Stewart Dry Goods Co. Vs. Lewis

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the efficiency commission of kentucky, vol. 2, p. 232, and martin & patton, "operations of real estate tax in lexington, ky." (bureau of business research, university of kentucky, page 294 u. s. 568 ms.). perhaps the chief reason is the rapidity of turnover in large scale enterprises; the effect of this mobility being to ..... has a normal or average validity, attested by experience and by the judgment of trained observers. the one view discovers in the attempted classification an act of arbitrary preference among groups essentially the same. t he other perceives in the division a sincere and rational endeavor to adapt the burdens of taxation ..... roberts delivered the opinion of the court. these are four suits heard by a specially constituted district court in kentucky to enjoin state officers from enforcing an act of that commonwealth imposing a gross sales tax. the plaintiffs are, respectively, a domestic corporation conducting a department store in louisville, a partnership operating a similar .....