Court : Delhi
..... advocate versus prem chand singhvi and others, air1957sc425 a.k. kraipak (supra), s. parthasarathi versus state of andhra pradesh, (1974) 3 scc459 dr. g. sarana versus university of lucknow and others, (1976) 3 scc585 ranjit thakur versus union of india and others, (1987) 4 scc611 government of t.n. versus munuswamy mudaliar and another, 1988 ..... others, (1984) 3 scc465 canara bank and others versus debasis das and others, (2003) 4 scc557 managing director, ecil, hyderabad and others versus b. karunakar and others, (1993) 4 scc727and ajit kumar nag versus general manager (pj), indian oil corporation limited, (haldia) and others, w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 44 of 79 ( ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... advocate versus prem chand singhvi and others, air1957sc425 a.k. kraipak (supra), s. parthasarathi versus state of andhra pradesh, (1974) 3 scc459 dr. g. sarana versus university of lucknow and others, (1976) 3 scc585 ranjit thakur versus union of india and others, (1987) 4 scc611 government of t.n. versus munuswamy mudaliar and another, 1988 ..... others, (1984) 3 scc465 canara bank and others versus debasis das and others, (2003) 4 scc557 managing director, ecil, hyderabad and others versus b. karunakar and others, (1993) 4 scc727and ajit kumar nag versus general manager (pj), indian oil corporation limited, (haldia) and others, w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 44 of 79 ( ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... advocate versus prem chand singhvi and others, air1957sc425 a.k. kraipak (supra), s. parthasarathi versus state of andhra pradesh, (1974) 3 scc459 dr. g. sarana versus university of lucknow and others, (1976) 3 scc585 ranjit thakur versus union of india and others, (1987) 4 scc611 government of t.n. versus munuswamy mudaliar and another, 1988 ..... others, (1984) 3 scc465 canara bank and others versus debasis das and others, (2003) 4 scc557 managing director, ecil, hyderabad and others versus b. karunakar and others, (1993) 4 scc727and ajit kumar nag versus general manager (pj), indian oil corporation limited, (haldia) and others, w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 44 of 79 ( ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... advocate versus prem chand singhvi and others, air1957sc425 a.k. kraipak (supra), s. parthasarathi versus state of andhra pradesh, (1974) 3 scc459 dr. g. sarana versus university of lucknow and others, (1976) 3 scc585 ranjit thakur versus union of india and others, (1987) 4 scc611 government of t.n. versus munuswamy mudaliar and another, 1988 ..... others, (1984) 3 scc465 canara bank and others versus debasis das and others, (2003) 4 scc557 managing director, ecil, hyderabad and others versus b. karunakar and others, (1993) 4 scc727and ajit kumar nag versus general manager (pj), indian oil corporation limited, (haldia) and others, w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 44 of 79 ( ..... january, 2018 under section 15 (4) of the government of national capital territory of delhi w.p. (c) 750/2018+ connected page 5 of 79 act, 1991 ('gnctd act', for short) disqualifying them as members of the legislative assembly of the national capital territory of delhi, in view of the opinion of the election commission of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of a member of the national human rights commission was in question. section 4 of the protection of wp(c) 8341/2017 page 13 of 29 human rights act, 1993, stipulated that the appointment of chairperson and other members of the national human rights commission has to be made, after obtaining recommendations of a committee comprising:-"the prime ..... nominated by the chancellor who was also empowered to appoint one of them as chairman of the committee. the two persons elected by the executive council of the university were mr g.k. shinde, a former chief justice of a high court and justice t.p. naik of the madhya pradesh high court while the third ..... ratio that when no quorum was prescribed and majority members were present, the meeting would be legal and valid. reference was also made to the judgment in punjab university, chandigarh vs. vijay singh lamba, air1976sc1441wherein the majority view taken by the full bench of the punjab & haryana high court in judgment reported as vijay singh lamba .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... himself personally signing the agreement or compromise would often cause undue delay, loss and inconvenience. the court held that it has always been universally understood that a party can always act by his duly authorized representative and if a power of attorney holder can enter into an agreement or compromise on behalf of his principal ..... of the company. in support of his submission, he relied upon the following judgments:-"a) banwari lal vs. chando devi (smt.) (through lrs.) & anr., (1993) 1 scc581wherein it has been held as under:-""11. the present case depicts as to how on february 27, 1991 the court recorded the alleged agreement and compromise ..... ies dealing with the defendant company. this, according to him, becomes evident from the fact that even the regular lawyer representing the defendant company believed and acted upon the resolution dated 29th september, 2001 by signing the settlement agreement dated 11th november, 2016.12. the learned amicus curiae laid emphasis on section 208 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of the annual confidential report which downgraded the employee vis- -vis his grading in earlier years. the supreme court observed that u.p. jal nigam (supra) has no universal application and that the said judgment was intended to be meant only for the employees of the u.p. jal nigam. in this context, the supreme court observed in ..... dhanwanti devi & others, (1996) 6 scc44 while dealing with the issue as to whether the earlier decision of the supreme court in union of india vs. hari krishan khosla, (1993) supp. 2 scc149 constitutes a binding w.p.(c) 3087/2016 & w.p.(c) 8443/2016 page 36 of 54 precedent or not, the supreme court, inter alia, ..... / ministries of the central government, and all those organizations which follow the oms issued by the dop&t. the fact cannot be wished away, that employees would have acted and conducted themselves, and made their choices and exercised their options, keeping in view the existing rule/ principle position as reflected in the om dated 03.03.2008. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... said requirement is now virtually a component of human rights and was considered part of strasbourg jurisprudence. see (1994) 19 ehrr553 at 562 para 29 and anya vs. university of oxford, 2001 ewca civ 405, wherein the court referred to article 6 of european convention of human rights which requires, "adequate and intelligent reasons must be given for ..... orders passed by the authorities under section 5(1) pmla. the aa under section 8 pmla cannot, therefore, be equated with an administrative tribunal under the administrative tribunals act 1985 (ata). the central administrative tribunal under the ata was vested with the powers originally with a high court under article 226 of the constitution. those were tribunals under ..... under section 26 ipc is understood in the sense of sufficient cause to believe that thing but not otherwise . in phool chand bajrang lal v. ito [1993]. 203 itr456(sc), the supreme w.p.(c) 5320/2017 & connected batch matters page 36 of 48 court in the context of the income tax .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... said requirement is now virtually a component of human rights and was considered part of strasbourg jurisprudence. see (1994) 19 ehrr553 at 562 para 29 and anya vs. university of oxford, 2001 ewca civ 405, wherein the court referred to article 6 of european convention of human rights which requires, "adequate and intelligent reasons must be given for ..... orders passed by the authorities under section 5(1) pmla. the aa under section 8 pmla cannot, therefore, be equated with an administrative tribunal under the administrative tribunals act 1985 (ata). the central administrative tribunal under the ata was vested with the powers originally with a high court under article 226 of the constitution. those were tribunals under ..... under section 26 ipc is understood in the sense of sufficient cause to believe that thing but not otherwise . in phool chand bajrang lal v. ito [1993]. 203 itr456(sc), the supreme w.p.(c) 5320/2017 & connected batch matters page 36 of 48 court in the context of the income tax .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... said requirement is now virtually a component of human rights and was considered part of strasbourg jurisprudence. see (1994) 19 ehrr553 at 562 para 29 and anya vs. university of oxford, 2001 ewca civ 405, wherein the court referred to article 6 of european convention of human rights which requires, "adequate and intelligent reasons must be given for ..... orders passed by the authorities under section 5(1) pmla. the aa under section 8 pmla cannot, therefore, be equated with an administrative tribunal under the administrative tribunals act 1985 (ata). the central administrative tribunal under the ata was vested with the powers originally with a high court under article 226 of the constitution. those were tribunals under ..... under section 26 ipc is understood in the sense of sufficient cause to believe that thing but not otherwise . in phool chand bajrang lal v. ito [1993]. 203 itr456(sc), the supreme w.p.(c) 5320/2017 & connected batch matters page 36 of 48 court in the context of the income tax .....
Tag this Judgment!