Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 22 the planning board Page 3 of about 3,236 results (1.533 seconds)

Jan 23 2008 (FN)

Fleming (T/a Bodycraft) (Respondent) Vs. Her Majestyand#8217;s Revenue ...

Court : House of Lords

..... of a period of disapplication (grundig ii, in september 2002), and (c) contrary to the firmly expressed opinion of the commissioners, the claims fell within regulation 29 (university of sussex v customs and excise commissioners [2004] stc 1, in october 2003). while the third point may not be significant, the first two points establish, at least ..... overpaid vat. they maintained that late claims for refund of under-deducted input tax were governed by section 80 of the 1994 act. neuberger j ruled in a judgment given on 10 october 2001 in university of sussex v customs and excise comissioners [2001] stc 1495 that this contention was incorrect and that they were governed by regulation ..... law (27 january 1991). grundig italiana, which had from 1983 to 1992 made payments of the wrongly-charged consumption tax, brought a claim for repayment on 22 july 1993. 44. grundig ii was a sort of rerun of the earlier case of aprile srl v amministrazione delle finanze dello stato case c-228/96 [1998] ecr i- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2013 (HC)

Anita Ghosh Vs. Shri Ram College of Commerce and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... parmesh dutta for exemption from net examination was placed before the exemption committee in its meeting held on 16.12.1996. after considering the proposal received from tezpur university, the committee agreed to grant exemption from net qualification to shri parmesh dutta in view of his excellent publications and recommendations of the selection committee. a ..... be sufficient for giving exemption from net qualifications. also, on a further pointed query, counsel for the ugc could not show any document that ugc was acting in terms of a particular declared/stated policy which delienated specific criteria when exemption can be granted from net qualification and when exemption cannot be granted.6. ..... of clearing net examination for those persons who had submitted ph.d thesis or passed m.phil examination by 31.12.1993, and ms. anita ghosh had obtained ph.d qualification by 31.12.1993. it is accordingly argued that the selection committee had no option but to choose ms. anita ghosh who was a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2013 (HC)

Kuljeet Kaur Vs. University of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... parmesh dutta for exemption from net examination was placed before the exemption committee in its meeting held on 16.12.1996. after considering the proposal received from tezpur university, the committee agreed to grant exemption from net qualification to shri parmesh dutta in view of his excellent publications and recommendations of the selection committee. a ..... be sufficient for giving exemption from net qualifications. also, on a further pointed query, counsel for the ugc could not show any document that ugc was acting in terms of a particular declared/stated policy which delienated specific criteria when exemption can be granted from net qualification and when exemption cannot be granted.6. ..... of clearing net examination for those persons who had submitted ph.d thesis or passed m.phil examination by 31.12.1993, and ms. anita ghosh had obtained ph.d qualification by 31.12.1993. it is accordingly argued that the selection committee had no option but to choose ms. anita ghosh who was a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2014 (FN)

Guo Ningqun Anthony Vs. Chan Wing Sun

Court : Singapore Supreme Court

..... 2010 to 31 october 2011. his total income from those appointments was about s$174,125. during this period, the plaintiff was employed by ntu and then monash university sunway campus. 11. as the story unfolded, 2007 was an extraordinary year for the parties. the family's wealth increased significantly. in march 2007, the parties bought ..... documents effectively discredited mr zhou's statement. on the evidence, the allegation of trust is not made out. as the statutory requirements of s 112(10)(b) of the act are satisfied, the soleil property is a matrimonial asset. 49. nevertheless, for the reasons stated below (see [110]-[112] below), i chose to exclude this property from ..... 112] below). i will elaborate on the choice of options in due course in the judgment. the matrimonial assets 29. i now come to s 112(10) of the act, which defines "matrimonial asset". the assets in the plaintiff's name were not disputed. for instance, bank accounts, shares and money in his cpf account were accepted as .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 1974 (FN)

Alexander Vs. americans United, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... footnote 11 ] the portion of 7421(a) beginning with "by any person" was added to the act in 1966. see bob jones university v. simon, ante at 416 u. s. 731 -732, n. 6. as we noted there, however, the "by any person" phrase reaffirms the plain meaning of the original ..... the service petitioned for review, and we granted certiorari. 412 u.s. 927 (1973). we reverse. in our opinion in bob jones university v. simon, ante, p. 416 u. s. 725 , we examined the meaning of the anti-injunction act and its interpretation in prior opinions of this court, and we reaffirmed our adherence to the two-part test announced in enochs ..... , in any event, clear that the federal tax exception to the declaratory judgment act is at least as broad as the prohibition of the anti-injunction act. because we hold that the latter act bars the instant suit, there is no occasion to deal separately with the former. see bob jones university v. simon, ante at 416 u. s. 732 -733, n. 7. [ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1943 (FN)

Helvering Vs. Griffiths

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , 918. [ footnote 15 ] the government calls attention to a memorandum submitted to the senate finance committee by graham, lecturer in finance at columbia university, which stated that: "the most suitable method of capitalizing reinvested earnings and making them taxable to the stockholders would be through the declaration of taxable ..... of stock dividends as income (1920) 33 harvard law review 885; cf. powell, constitutional aspects of federal income taxation, in the federal income tax (columbia university lectures, 1921) 51; ballantine, corporate personalty in income taxation, (1921) 34 harvard law review 573; powell, income from corporate dividends, (1922) 35 harvard ..... law review 252; surrey, the scope and effect of treasury regulations under the income, estate and gift taxes, 88 university of pennsylvania law review 556; brown, regulations, reenactment, and the revenue acts, 54 harvard law review 377; griswold, a summary of the regulations problem, 54 harvard law review 398; feller .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2013 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Shukla and ors. Vs. Awadhesh Pratap Singh University and a ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... in by promotion of reserved category persons. since the persons like petitioners, who are senior enough, have been denied promotion in such illegal manner by the respondent-university, they have represented the claim before the respondent no.1 but since nothing was done, this writ petition is required to be filed. it is contended ..... the record.5. it is not in dispute that the 100 point roster is made applicable by the respondent-university. it is also not disputed that the provisions of the act aforesaid are made applicable by the university. thus, it would be clear that circular so issued by the state government in respect of maintaining 100 ..... point roster would be applicable to the respondent-university. the government of madhya pradesh in general administration department has issued a .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2013 (SC)

Nirma Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... class as those listed. 44. the meaning of the expression ejusdem generis was considered by this court on a number of occasions and has been reiterated in maharashtra university of health sciences and ors. vs. satchikitsa prasarak mandal & ors. [(2010) 3 scc 786] the principle is defined thus : the latin expression ejusdem ..... . this court in canara banks case (supra) reiterated the principle laid down in managing director, ecil, hyderabad & ors. vs. b. karunakar & ors. [(1993) 4 scc 727] here again, this court has reiterated that even an administrative order, which involved civil consequences, must be consistent with the rules of natural justice. the ..... shares in the ordinary course of business. the regulation provides exemption from regulation 10, 11 and 12 to scheduled commercial banks or public financial institutions acting as pledgees in the ordinary course of business, in order to facilitate their business operations. such acquisition of shares in normal circumstances is not with .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2013 (SC)

Nirma Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... open offer need not be on account of impossibility only. in support of these submissions, he relied on municipal corporation of greater bombay vs. bharat petroleum corporation ltd.[6]. maharashtra university of health sciences & ors. vs. satchikitsa prasarak mandal & ors. [7]. and union of india & ors. vs. alok kumar [8]..38. we are unable to ..... the appeal and it is accordingly dismissed. .. . j.[surinder singh nijjar]. .j.[anil r. dave]. new delhi; may 09, 2013.-.---------------------- [1]. (2003) 4 scc 55.[2]. (1993) 4 scc 72.[3]. (2011) 2 scc 25.[4]. (2012) 2 scc 32.[5]. (1996) 4 scc 6.[6]. (2002) 4 scc 219.[7]. (2010) 3 scc 78 ..... that acquire shares in the ordinary course of business. the regulation provides exemption from regulation 10, 11 and 12 to scheduled commercial banks or public financial institutions acting as pledgees in the ordinary course of business, in order to facilitate their business operations. such acquisition of shares in normal circumstances is not with the intention .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 1890 (FN)

Mcgahey Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

..... aside and reserved from sale, out of the public lands within the said territory, for the use and support of a university within the said territory. in 1836, congress passed another act entitled "an act supplementary to the act entitled 'an act for the admission of the state of arkansas into the union, and to provide for the due execution of the laws of ..... the united page 135 u. s. 720 states within the same, and for other purposes,'" by which last act the lands so reserved for the use and support of a university were vested in the state of arkansas. on the 28th of december, 1840, the legislature of arkansas passed an ..... act entitled "an act to authorize the governor to dispose of the seminary lands," and in 1842, the then governor of the state sold to john w. paup the right to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //