Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 11 the chancellor Court: karnataka Page 11 of about 137 results (0.156 seconds)

K.R. Khaleel Ahmed and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, rep. by its ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the four advisers a majority of them preferably from outside the state of karnataka may have a few reputed academic administrators as retired vice-chancellors of central universities; retired professors of indian institutes of technology, retired professors of indian institutes of management, retired professors of indian institute of public administration, new delhi, retired ..... relying on the judgment of the apex court in the case of dr.m.s.mudhol and another vs. s.d.halegkar and others reported in (1993)3 scc 591 that at this distance of time, the selections made more than 12 years back cannot be unsettled. he also submitted that the very ..... member, kpsc and four other officials, after a preliminary investigation report was submitted to the government and seeking sanction under the provisions of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. it is submitted that the matter is reserved for judgment. as these large scale irregularities in conducting the examination and personality test has unabated, .....

The Indian Bank Rep. by Its General Manager Managing Director and Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

..... made applicable to all the employees who were in service of the bank on or after first day of january 1986 but had retired before the first day of november 1993. the said shivaona having died in november 1991, i.e., subsequent to first of january 1986 was entitled to pension under the said scheme. after coming into force of the .....

S.D. Sridhar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(5)KarLJ509

..... cannot seek an employment as a matter of right. i must also notice at this stage, a division bench judgment of this court in keshayya channayya hiremath v. university of agricultural sciences and ors., 1971(2) mys. l.j. 330 db with regard to selection and relaxation of qualification. this court ruled that relaxation is permissible ..... was in those circumstances, the court ruled that article 14 was violated in the said case. 6. the supreme court union territory of chandigarh v. dilbagh singh, : (1993)iillj1043sc and ors., was considering with regard to unfair selection list and in those circumstances court ruled that there is arbitrariness. 7. krishan yadav and anr. v. state ..... the facts and circumstances of each case differ. petitioner is unable to show with reference to the facts of this case that respondents are playing fraud or has acted contrary to any provision of law. on the other hand, material on record would show that with a view to provide better opportunity, the committee has .....

S. Bhaskar Vs. Gulbarga University

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1994KAR2873; 1994(3)KarLJ258

..... respondent to revalue the petitioner's mathematics paper of b.sc.ii year examination held in october 1993. the facts of the case in brief are: that the petitioner appeared in ii year b.sc. examination conducted by the respondent-university in october 93 and the petitioner appeared in all the five papers. he scored good marks in ..... been rejected on the ground that there is no provision for revaluation. the only question for this court to consider is whether there is any provision in the act or any statutes pertaining to revaluation and as to time limit to claim revaluation.3. i have heard sri g.r. gurumath, learned counsel for the petitioner ..... hereunder in extenso;'statute 30: statute governing re-valuation of answer scripts:there shall be a provision for revaluation of valued written answer scripts at any of the university examinations, excepting where there is double valuation subject to the following:i) where more than one examiner is assigned for the assessment of the answer scripts of a .....

Dr. Haritha Ravipati Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences fo ...

Court : Karnataka

..... passing marks and has consequently, requested the vice chancellor to direct for revaluations under the extraordinary powers bestowed on him under the rajiv gandhi university of health sciences act, 1994. the respondent university did not take any action on the said representations made by her. aggrieved by the wrongful valuation and non-consideration of the representations ..... council at, it will have mandatory force. regulations have been framed with reference to clauses (fa), (fb) and (fc) (which have been introduced by the amendment act of 1993 w.e.f. august 27, 1992) and clauses (j), (k) and (l) of section 33. 25. in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the ..... present case, the notification dated 1.7.2015 issued by the 1st respondent-rajiv gandhi university of health sciences introducing double evaluation system is contrary to regulation 14 .....

Mallikarjuna Swamy Vs. University of Agricultural Sciences

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR834; 1995(2)KarLJ482

..... relying on these two certificates in support of his contention that he is qualified as on 22.11.1993. on the other hand, the contention of the university is that, unless an official notification is issued by the university declaring the results of the examination in which the petitioner took part, it cannot be said that ..... the degree. it is further stated in the instant case, so far as the petitioner is concerned, official notification is issued by the university of agricultural sciences, bangalore, only on 17.12.1993 on the date when the marks card was issued to the petitioner and that he became qualified only from 17.12 ..... . the last date for submitting the application pursuant to annexure 'a' notification was 22.11.1993. along with the application, the petitioner had enclosed a certificate dated 20.11.1993 issued by the professor and head, department of agricultural economics, university of agricultural sciences, hebbal, bangalore, in which, it is stated that the petitioner had completed .....

Dr. S. Thippeswamy, Mangalore Vs. Mangalore University, Mangalore, by ...

Court : Karnataka

..... have been translated for the purpose of this order to english). the following are the charges against dr. s. thippeswamy, associate professor, department of biosciences, mangalore university. charge no.1: behaved indecently and caused mental and sexual harassment to miss. puneetha pandey and miss. divya shetty, research students (scholars) and smt. dr. ..... bluntly and stubbornly refusing to hand over charge of his duties, as directed by the university repeatedly, which, according to the learned senior advocate shri p.s. rajagopal, would have to be considered as the gravest act of misconduct which alone would warrant the extreme punishment of dismissal from service. in the pleadings ..... right to gender equality and right to life and liberty-the two most precious fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution of india. as early as in 1993, at the ilo seminar held at manila, it was recognized that sexual harassment of women at the workplace was a form of gender discrimination against .....

R.L. Raghunatha Reddy Vs. University of Agricultural Sciences and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003(3)KarLJ400

..... had not successfully completed his m.sc. degree as the marks card was issued to him only on 17-12-1993. this court interpreting the regulations of the university in force during the year 1993 which is totally different from the present one held that the mere fact of having appeared for the examination and even obtaining ..... an advertisement or notification issued/published calling for applications constitutes a representation to the public and the authority issuing it is bound by such a representation. it cannot act contrary to it. one reason behind this proposition is, if it were known the persons who obtained the qualification after the prescribed date but, before the date ..... -2001 and completed his course when the viva voce examination was held on 6-9-2002 and on the same day, his results were declared. the further acts of issuing a marks card is only ministerial and on account of certain internal disturbances, the marks card was not issued till the end of october 2002. therefore .....

Dr. Krishna Prasad Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(1988)ACC423; ILR1988KAR923

..... was a novice or an inexperienced surgeon.dr.vasanti is m.b.b.s. d.g.o. dr.malati has passed m.b.b.s.examination from mysore university. both these lady doctors also havebeen practising in that nursing home since the last so many years.dr.vasanti has got a diploma in gynaecology and obstetrics. ..... of circumspection. it is manifest that personal injury,consciously and intentionally caused, cannot fall within either ofthese categories which are wholly inapplicable to the case of an actor series of acts, themselves intended, which are the direct producersof death. following this, in the well-known case of empress of indiav. idu beg (i.l.r. 3 all 776 ..... of children made gravely ill.'the learned author shri nelson in his l.p.c. 7th edition (1983edition) has stated on page 1144 as :-'culpable negligence is acting without theconsciousness that the illegal and mischievous effect will follow, butin the circumstances which show that the actor has not exercised thecaution, incumbent upon him, and that if .....

Manipal University and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... alia, stated that the government of india had, in exercise of power under section 3 of the university grants commission act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the "ugc act", for brevity), vide notification dated 1.6.1993 conferred the "deemed university " status on the "manipal academy of higher education' consisting of kasturba medical college, manipal; kasturba ..... : " admissions play a crucial role in maintaining the high quality of education . and for the proper maintenance of academic excellence, as intended by the ugc act ,admissions to a deemed university have, to be made under the control of the ugc " ( bharaihi vidyapeeth v. state of maharashtra, (2004 ) 11 scc 755 ) it is ..... that any given institution fulfills all criteria and requirements in terms of guidelines for declaring that institution as a deemed to be university under section 3 of the ugc act. it is stated that each of the petitioners and their institutions have been administered all along in accordance with such terms and .....