Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tezpur university act 1993 section 11 the chancellor Court: jharkhand Page 6 of about 53 results (0.089 seconds)

Deobrat Sahay Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2003(2)BLJR1059; [2003(2)JCR610(Jhr)]

..... only with premature retirement and the high court also dealt with that aspect of the matter only. this court's judgment in dr. bool chand v. chancellor kurukshetra university relied upon by the high court is not on the point involved in this case. in that case the tenure of dr. bool chand was curtailed as he was ..... extension does not amount to arbitrariness in exercise of power. their lordship of the supreme court in the case of food corporation of india v. kamdhenu cattle feed industries, (1993) 1 scc 71 observed : 'the mere reasonable or legitimate expectation of a citizen, in such a situation, may not by itself be a distinct enforceable right, but failure ..... but the said decision will have no application to the case in hand where; neither the order of appointment as chairman, nor the provisions of the banking resolution act nor any rules of bank of cochin hold that there is an automatic cessation from the substantive post of the employee the moment he is appointed as chairman though .....

Dr S M Sulaiman Quli Vs. The Birsa Agricultural University Through Its ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... till passing of the impugned orders. while continuing as such, on 28.05.2009 after around four years of unblemished service on the non-cadre post of university professor-cum-chief scientist (forestry), a show cause was served on the petitioner challenging the second phase promotion from assistant professor-cum-junior scientist (forestry), senior ..... counsel for the petitioner has challenged the impugned order of punishment of cancellation of promotion to the post of associate professor and demotion from the post of university professor to the post of assistant professor is unlawful, on the ground stated hereinbelow: (i) learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the definition of misconduct ..... article 311 (2) is not applicable in the instant case, in view of the statutory provision and in this regard, he has referred to the decision reported in: (i) (1993) 1 scc419(ii) (1984) 1 scc43(para-18, 28 and29) (iii) (2004) 5 scc263(para-14) (iv) (2004) 13 scc41812. after bestowing my anxious .....

Balvir Singh Tomar Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Its Home Secreta ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... sonali tripathi, the aforesaid case was instituted with the allegation that the informant is presently pursuing her bachelors course in radiation and imaging technology, 2nd year, nims university, jaipur and resides in the college hostel. on 25.10.2014, the chancellor of her college balvir singh tomar- the petitioner visited ranchi and stayed in ..... of defence but the 4 investigating officer wants the appearance of this petitioner before him with intention to arrest this petitioner, which would be evident from the act of the investigating officer that during pendency of this writ application, warrant of arrest has been issued against this petitioner, which has been brought on record ..... arrest without an order from a magistrate and without a warrant, if a cognizable offence has been committed. obviously, the investigating officer is not expected to act in a mechanical manner and in all cases to arrest the accused as soon as the report is lodged in an appropriate case after some investigation. .....