Court : Kolkata
Reported in : 2008(2)CHN546
..... do all acts required or permitted by that section.for greater transparency and convenience of the citizens, a copy of this ..... 30 days from the date of publication of the declaration under section 6 of the aforesaid act.all land owners and interested parties as well as any nationalized or foreign bank's representative, central government, state government, government undertaking, department or representative of any other private sectors, are to disclose about the liabilities/mortgaged ..... . the date of publication of the declaration under section 6 of the aforesaid act.in exercise of the powers conferred by the aforesaid section, the governor is hereby pleased to authorise the officers for the time being engaged in the undertaking with their servants and workmen, to enter upon and survey the land and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1993Cal78
..... land held in connection with mineral rights were the tax levied under the said act. m.p. karadhan adhiniyam, 1982 (act 15 of 1982) 9. (1) there shall be levied and collected - (a) on the land held under mining lease for undertaking mining operations for a major mineral other than coal a mineral areas development cess ..... , 1973. ................................... section 14. exclusion of jurisdiction of courts.-- (1) on and from the date from which jurisdiction, powers and authority becomes exercisable under this act by the tribunal, the high court or any civil court except the supreme court of india shall not be entitled to entertain any proceeding or to exercise any ..... at the rate of one hundred per centum of the rental value thereof; (b) on the land held under mining lease for undertaking .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1995Cal365,99CWN1090
..... limited, if allowed to come true, will amount to retrenchment of workmen as well as closure of the undertaking thereby attracting the provisions of section 25n and section 25-o respectively of the industrial disputes act, 1947. it is argued further by the learned advocate for the petitioners that the pfizer limited cannot therefore ..... or transfer the kalyani factory to the torrent pharmaceutical limited without complying with the provisions of section 25n and section 25-o of the industrial, disputes act, 1947. it has been argued by the learned advocate for the petitioners in this; connection that by selling the factory the pfizer limited is virtually ..... 6. lorrent pharmaceutical limited. the pfizeris stated to be a manufacturing multinational and pfizer limited having its head office at bombay is incorporated under the companies act and is engaged in the business of manufacture of pharmaceutical products. the company has four units at four places in india, namely. thane in maharashtra, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1996)2CALLT183(HC),100CWN900
..... reported in : [1954]1scr779 , the apex court held that in absence of a power to acquire a moveable property, the madras electric supply undertakings (acquisitions act) cannot be nationalised under section 104 and 299(8) of the government of india act.60. in america, however, despite existence of no provision to acquire a property it was held that the acquisition of properties is permissible ..... said provision was also held to be covered under article 31c of the constitution of india holding that nationalisation of an undertaking may also come within the purview of article 39b and 39c of the constitution. the said act thus was also considering a case when article 31(2) was in existence.77. the submission of mr. gupta to the effect that jillubhai .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1998)2CALLT130(HC),1998(2)CHN15,(1999)ILLJ904Cal
..... part of the regulations. it has notbeen, and could not be disputed by the appellants that the regulations having been framed in terms of the provisions of the nationalisation act, were statutory in nature, and in that view of the matter, the authorities framing the said regulations, could direct that the matter relating to provident fund and ..... the fact of the matter lies in a very narrow compass.3. the appellant bank was nationalised in terms of the banking companies (acquisition & transfer of undertakings) act, 1970. section 21 of the said act was brought into force under section 1(2) of the said act on 19.7.69. the board of directors, in terms of the aforementioned provisions, are ..... vires of any such provision, nor any such question has been raised in the writ application or before us. in lalappa lingappa v. laxml vishnu textile mills, reported in : (1981)illj308sc , the apex court while interpreting the definition of continuous service as contained in section 2(c) of payment of gratuity .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ1183Cal
..... attention was also drawn to the hind cycles ltd. and sen raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) act, 1980 where in section 13(1) it is laid down that 'every person who has been, immediately before the appointed day, employed in any undertaking of either of the two companies shall become-(a) on and from the ..... giant public sector undertaking, formed pursuant to the vesting in the central government the undertakings of two public limited companies, namely, hind cycle ltd. and sen raleigh ltd. under the provisions of industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 and thereafter by an act of parliament hind cycle ltd. and sen raleigh ltd. (nationalisation) act 1980. the ..... this contention. the terms and conditions of the service of the workmen being governed by the statutory provision, namely, the hind cycle and sen raleigh (nationalisation) act, 1980, the matter comes under domain of public law. contention of mr. das accordingly cannot be accepted.15. though not seriously still the petitioners .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : 2004(4)CHN121,2004(178)ELT114(Cal)
..... comply with the obligations arising out of the notification.29. in the case of national textile corp. ltd. and ors. v. haribox swalram and ors., reported in : air2004sc1998 , the question was whether liabilities in respect of a taken-over textile undertakings could be enforced against the central government through a writ of mandamus at the instance of ..... , the court should see that the s.t.c. cannot misuse its authority by indiscriminately selling such benefit to others by violating the provisions of the customs act. i, thus, find that those decisions rather support the contentions of the petitioners.28. as regards the objection of the respondents on the question of locus ..... by virtue of a treaty between india and nepal, the government of india, department of revenue, in exercise of power conferred under section 25 of the customs act, 1962, issued a notification in the public interest thereby exempting the vegetable fat imported from nepal from the whole of the duty of customs to the extent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : I(2006)ACC106,2006ACJ839,III(2006)BC73,(2005)3CALLT271(HC)
..... undertakings) act, 1970 is to be considered first.31. the hon'ble supreme court in the case of ashoka marketing ltd. (supra) has elaborately discussed the effect of the said act in paragraph 14 thereof which is set out hereunder as follows:-'14. the nationalised banks have been established under the banks nationalisation act, wherein the nationalised ..... and be sued in its name. from the aforesaid provisions contained in section 3 of the banks nationalisation act. it is evident that the nationalised banks have been established under the provisions of the said act and the same are distinct juristic persons with perpetual succession and the power to acquire, hold and ..... procedure.13. by referring to the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970, mr. dasgupta clarified the effect of such act on the status of the nationalised bank. mr. dasgupta referred to section 2(d) of the said act which defines the corresponding new bank in relation to an existing bank which .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1980Cal354
..... 1970 or from 17-10-1971 when the business undertaking was taken over by the government under the provisions of coking coal mines (emergency) provisions ordinance 1971 which ultimately culminated in nationalisation of the said business under the provisions of coking coal mines (nationalisation) act 1972. this allegation of dissolution is denied by ..... agreement became unworkable. hence stay should be refused.3. the counsel for the appearing respondents, cited several cases in support of their contention that the aforesaid acts of the petitioner would amount to taking steps in the proceeding. great reliance was placed on air 1943 cal, 484, : air1954cal606 and : air1970mad323 , ..... held to be referable to arbitration. whether an arbitrator will have jurisdiction to grant reliefs under section 44 (f) and (g) of partnership act will depend on the agreement itself. the arbitration clause set out above clearly shows that the arbitrator has jurisdiction to decide any dispute between partners .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : 2007(4)CHN842
..... assistant registrar (court) be given to the learned advocate general, mr. saktinath mukherjee, mr. amjad ali and mr. kalyan bandopadhyay, learned counsels for the petitioner on usual undertaking.(s.s. nijjar, cj.)(pinaki chandra ghose, j.)4. thereafter, the matter was heard at length on numerous dates. we will now consider the matter in detail.5. ..... but we will set up chemical hub elsewhere. because as a part of that chemical hub i.o.c. will install refinery. the downstream units will produce textiles from polymer and rubber from butadiene. as a whole a developed chemical industrial zone will be formed. but if the local people are reluctant, the venue of the ..... would be required to control a particular situation. it is quite different from sitting and calculating in a cool and serene atmosphere of a court room dissecting the acts and counter-acts alleged by parties. this observation has been approved by the supreme court in the case of akhilesh prasad (supra). again in the cases of empress v. .....
Tag this Judgment!