Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: textile undertakings nationalisation act 1995 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 52 results (0.059 seconds)

May 26 1960 (HC)

Malik Ram and ors. Vs. Regional Transport Authority Jaipur and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1961Raj130

..... of the services in future and mere possibility should not be sufficient. it was further pointed out that the scheme for nationalisation to be prepared by a state transport undertaking has to be published objections have to be invited and finally it has to be approved by the state government.relying upon ..... the applications for renewal on the ground of the pendency of a scheme of nationalisation before the state transport undertaking working in the name and style of rajasthan roadways, much less on the basis of a contemplated scheme of nationalisation. in this connection reliance was placed upon the proper interpretation of the words ..... act of the state in considering the scheme for approval may be a quasi-judicial one, it will be hardly fair to conclude that there cannot be any reasonable probability of a scheme for nationalisation being approved by the state government.in my opinion, it can be fairly presumed that the probability of a scheme prepared by a state transport undertaking .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 1966 (HC)

Jagjit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1968Raj24

..... , according to mr. gupta, has been made to expedite the grant of permits to the displaced operators, from the nationalised route on the alternative route or routes. 19. section 68-b of the act clearly states that the provisions of chapter iv-a and the rules and orders made thereunder shall have effect notwithstanding anything ..... into play and it provides that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in chapter iv, the regional transport authority shall issue such a permit to the state transport undertaking. sub-section (2) also provides for certain other actions to be taken by the regional transport authority to give effect to the approved scheme and it may ..... 1556 a question was raised before the supreme court whether it was necessary for the regional transport authority to publish the application filed by the state transport undertaking under section 68-e for the grant of permit on the notified route or area, and unless such an application was duly published and a notice thereof .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1970 (HC)

Trilokidas and ors. Vs. Firm Ram NaraIn Damodar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1971Raj88

..... . the ship was condemned as a prize at colombo, but she was allowed by the government to proceed and discharge her cargo at her destination, the government undertaking to give delivery to british subjects who were entitled to receive delivery of the cargo on board the ship. in a suit by plaintiff for breach of contract ..... is in no sense a continuation of the original voyage in fulfilment of the contract of affreightment but is essentially a new voyage under new conditions.' 21. in textile . v, salomon bros., air 191.6 bom 251, where in february 1914 the defendants agreed to purchase from the plaintiffs certain goods during the year ending 31st ..... government engages to protect the territory of joypore and to expel the enemies of that principality. article 3 maharajah sewaee juggut singh and his heirs and successors will act in subordinate co-operation with the british government and acknowledge its supremacy; and will not have any connection with other chiefs and states. article 4 the maharajah .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1973 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Raghunath Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1974Raj4; 1973()WLN424

..... functions have been taken away. they include, in addition to the execution of the laws, the maintenance of public order, the management of crown property and nationalised industries and services, the direction of foreign policy, the conduct of military operations and the provision or supervision of such services as education, public health, transport, ..... substituted with the object to make it clear that the union government as well as the state government are competent to carry on any commercial or industrial undertaking whether or not it is related to a matter within the legislative competence of the union or as the case may be of the state. similarly, ..... officer awarded compensation. rameshwar daval not being satisfied with the award asked the land acquisition officer to make a reference under section 18 of the land acquisition act. the district judge, kota, who heard the reference, increased the amount of compensation. it was against that order of the learned district judge that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1973 (HC)

Kripal Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN906

..... insertion of chapter iva in the m.v. act was to facilitate the introduction or expansion of nationalisation of transport service & to encourage the grant of monopoly permits to the state transport undertaking & to cover other ancillary matters. having regard to the object of the act and the scheme of section 68-c of the ..... m.v act there is no justification for taking a ..... the petitioners is that the state road transport corporation (hereinafter called the corporation) having been superseded, there is no state undertaking to continue proceedings under chapter iva of the moter vehicles act. it was argued that the corporation alone could continue proceedings and the administrator looking after the affairs of the corporation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1975 (HC)

Mohammed Shafi and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1977Raj6

..... with the plying of the vehicles of the said respondents between dhardi and bhensrodgarh. mere publication of the proposed or draft schemes of nationalisation under section 68-c of the act could not have the effect of prohibiting the states from entering into a reciprocal agreement, because at that stage it was not possible ..... the notified route or not cannot be ascertained from the notified route. the notified route may merely state the route to be operated by the state transport undertaking and the total or partial prohibition on other operators from operating on that route or a portion thereof. where, however, other operators are permitted to ..... , not included in the scheme, shall be allowed to ply as before. 4. no person other than the madhya pradesh state road transport corporation 'state transport undertaking' will be permitted to provide road transport service (stage carriage or contract carriage) on the routes or portions thereof specified in clause (2) above except as provided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1980 (HC)

Kishori Lal and 91 ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1980WLN(UC)379

..... the constitution of india.9. on a plain reading of chapter iv a mentioned above, it would appear that the state transport undertaking in the principal organisation which has to initiate the schemes of nationalisation of the road transport services. this chapter starts with a 'non-obstente' clause in the form of section 68 b which ..... by constitutional umbrella of 9th schedule only was negatived on the ground that the umbrella provides protection to the act from constitutional challenge but it can always be examined whether a scheme of nationalisation fulfils the requirement of the act.32. apart from this, in the judgment of sindhi sahiti mal purpose transport, cooperative society, specify ..... , will show that under resolution no. ill of 1976 dated 31-1-76, the corporation formed an opinion as required under section 68-c of the act. it is contended by the learned advocate for the petitioner that no such opinion had been formed by the rajasthan state road transport corporation, and further there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1988 (HC)

National Textile Corporation (Dp and R) Ltd. and 3 ors. Vs. State of R ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN275

..... were in liquidation the management of their units were taken by the central government under the provisions of the sick textile (taking over of management) act, 1972 in the year 1972 and subsequently, the mills were nationalised in the year 1974 under the provisions of the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act 1974 and their ownership was transferred to the ntc ltd., under section 3 of the said ..... act. ntc ltd. formed 9 subsidiary corporations under section 6 of the said act and the petitioner is one of the nine subsidiary corporations which is controlling .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1989 (HC)

Kana Ram and Etc. Etc. Vs. the Regional Transport Authority and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1990Raj143; 1989WLN(UC)373

..... be said to have been done for the entire duration of the permits or for the period of three years, and therebeing approved nationalised schemes under and section 68d(2)(3) of the act, the permit-holders have no right of counter-signatures and the rta hissar/ faridabad or for that matter any other rta cannot be ..... though clause (viii) it was agreed that the rajasthan transport authorities may issue upto 50% extra stage carriage permits to the operators other than the state transport undertakings. the number of daily return trips however was to be strictly as fixed under the agreement and will not be exceeded under any circumstances, but that clause ..... uninterrupted service, it was agreed that the rajasthan transport authorities may issue up to 50% extra stage carriage permits to the operators other than the state transport undertaking. the number of daily return trips however shall be strictly as fixed under the agreement and will not be exceeded under any circumstances. all such permits shall .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 1994 (HC)

Rajasthan State R.T.C. Jaipur Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1(1994)ACC532

..... religious gatherings. if such situation arises in relation to a nationalised route or a portion thereof section 101 of the act provides operation of additional services by state transport undertaking. section 101 reads as under:101.-operation of additional services by the state transport undertaking in certain circumstances- notwithstanding anything contained in section 87, a ..... travel bus service and anr. v. state of uttar pradesh and ors.: : air1986sc319 considered the entire aspect in relation of a nationalised route under chapter iv-a of the old act and held that where the route covered by the scheme over-laps any route, no permit to private operators could be granted. ..... 1991 and that there is reciprocal arrangement for issuance of temporary permits under section 87(a) of the act to the private operators. it was also submitted that exclusion or prohibition on a nationalised route to ply transport services by a private operator should not apply on transport vehicles to be used temporarily .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //