Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: textile undertakings nationalisation act 1995 chapter 1 preliminary Court: karnataka Page 5 of about 661 results (0.108 seconds)

Jul 11 2014 (HC)

Sri R Shankaran Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... schemes (hereinafter referred to as development scheme ) for the development of the bangalore metropolitan area ; and (b) with the previous approval of the government, undertake from time to time any works for the development of the bangalore metropolitan area and incur expenditure therefor and also for the framing and execution of development ..... was expressed thus: 8. we shall now examine the provisions of bda act and l.a. act with reference to contentions raised on either side. chapter iii of the bda act provides for developmental schemes. section 15 empowers the authority to undertake a development scheme. section 16 requires the particulars, to be provided in ..... tenor of the provisions of chapter iii of the bda act, especially sections 15 & 16 in considering whether the notification issued under section 17 is in consonance thereof. the said sections are reproduced hereunder for ready reference. 15. power of authority to undertake works and incur expenditure for development, etc.- (1) the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 2018 (HC)

Sri S Hareesh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the doctrine of legitimate expectation to be confined mostly to right of a fair hearing before a decision which results in negativing a promise or withdrawing an undertaking is taken. the doctrine does not give scope to claim relief straightaway from the administrative authorities as no crystallized right as such involved. the protection of ..... from all encumbrances such status of the property is incapable of being altered by fiction of law either by the state act or by the central act i.e., bda act or la act, 1894 as these acts do not contain any provision in terms of which property, once and absolutely, vested in the state could be reverted ..... nevertheless, the dictum of the hon ble supreme court in the case of manav dharam trust could be considered, wherein the provisions of delhi development authority act, 1957 ( dda act for short) was considered. learned counsel for petitioners in other connected writ petitions, sri lohitaswa banakar, relied upon the decision of this court in the case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2014 (HC)

Sri Sudhakar Hegde Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... it was expressed thus: 8. we shall now examine the provisions of bda act and l.a. act with reference to contentions raised on either side. chapter iii of the bda act provides for developmental schemes. section 15 empowers the authority to undertake a development scheme. section 16 requires the particulars, to be provided in such ..... council is the one in secretary of state vs. hindustan coop. society ltd. [air1931pc148. there the provisions of the calcutta improvement act, 1911 (act 13/1911) fell for consideration. that act coupled with its schedule contained provisions not only for issuing relevant notification in regard to acquisition but also for reference to a tribunal ..... shankar's case [1994 (1) scc92, agrawal, j.held that the principle of incorporation' applied and therefore the above amendments of 1948 to the central act, 1894 did not apply. reference was also made to the privy council judgment in secretary of state vs. hindustan cooperative insurance society ltd. [air1931pc149. after .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2015 (HC)

M/S Arasor Corporation Vs. M/S Xalted Information Systems Pvt Ltd

Court : Karnataka

..... that for the purpose of fulfilling the obligations under those contracts, the parties would enter into back to back purchase orders, under which the purchaser would undertake the duties and responsibilities of the sellers to obtain all rights, obligations and benefits of those contracts. and further that the contract which the respondent had with ..... of equipment described as fwts and ifwts , upon the indian telephone industries (hereinafter referred to as the iti , for brevity ), also a government of india undertaking. iti, in turn, 4 is said to have placed a purchase order on the respondent for the same goods. the respondent is said to have sought to ..... throughout. it is so provided in the statutory provisions contained in the english companies act, 1985 as well as companies act, 1956. no reference to decide cases or case-law is, therefore, necessary on this aspect of the case. 4. maharashtra state textile corporation limited vs. official liquidator and others, (1978)1 scc490 the apex court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2016 (HC)

Smt K M Chikkathayamma Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... official gazette and has become operative with effect from the 31st october, 2007. many state governments have their own rehabilitation and resettlement policies. many public sector undertakings or agencies also have their own policies in this regard.10. the law would apply when government acquires land for its own use, hold and control, ..... 25. the bill seeks to achieve the above objects. the notes on clauses explain the various provisions contained in the bill . preamble: (to the la act, 2013) an act to ensure, in consultation with institutions of local self- government and gram sabhas established under the constitution, a humane, participative, informed and transparent process for ..... be placed on the order in the writ petitions for the purpose of deciding the 79 issue with respect to section 24(2) of the la act, 2013 act. except producing three orders passed by the learned single judges, the petitioners have not produced any other legally acceptable material to show that the possession is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2015 (HC)

High Court of Karnataka Vs. Sri Jai Chaitanya Dasa @ Jayanarayana K

Court : Karnataka

..... appeal was not posted for the said purpose and the parties and their counsel were not notified of the scope of enquiry that the learned judge intended to undertake, as is clear from the order sheet or the cause list.-. 75 - 41. this incidence brings to the fore, the problem the judges are facing ..... proper administration of law and justice. the court is willing to ignore, by a majestic liberalism trifling and venial offences. the court will not be prompted to act as a result of an easy irritability. the judges should not be hypersensitive, even when distortions and criticisms overstep the limits. they should deflate vulgar denunciation by ..... jai chaitanya dasa @ jayanarayana k., 42 years, s/o mr.k.c.d.nambisan, secretary of international society for krishna consciousness, a society reg. under karnataka society reg. act 1960, & claming to have its reg. office at hare krishna hill, chord road, rajajinagar, bengaluru city 10. sri madhu pandit das, president of international society for krishna .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2014 (HC)

Union of India Vs. Shri Yaswanth G V

Court : Karnataka

..... not less than three per cent (3%) seats in government educations institutions and other educational institutions receiving aid from the government, etc. etc. the disabilities act also specifically stipulates that if in any recruitment year any vacancy cannot be filled up due to non-availability of persons with disabilities i.e. (i) ..... in the said meeting held on 05.12.1992 at beijing about the full participation and equality of people with disabilities in asian and pacific regions. the act aims to provide for the following: i) to spell out the responsibility of the state towards the prevention of disabilities, protection of rights, provision of ..... ii) low vision; (iii) leprosy-cured; (iv) hearing impairment; (v) locomotor disability; (vi) mental retardation; (vii) mental illness; 15. section 2(o) of the said act defines locomotor disability . 18 w.p.no.44696/2014 2(o) locomotor disability means disability of the bones, joints or muscles leading to substantial restriction of the movement of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2015 (HC)

J. Jayalalitha and Others Vs. State, By the Superintendent of Police, ...

Court : Karnataka

..... on record. the trial court has failed to appreciate the evidence in a proper perspective. the immovable properties were acquired by borrowing huge loan from the nationalised banks. it is difficult to infer that the properties were acquired by means of ill-gotten money. therefore, in my view, confiscation of the ..... other vehicles in connection with the marriage. (12) expenditure on the purchase of jewellery for the marriage. (13) expenditure on the dresses, clothes and other textile items for the marriage. (14) expenditure in the video coverage of the function. in this connection, details may also be furnished regarding the expenditure incurred ..... enactment or some rules under the authority of a valid law such as representation of people act, to ensure that all ministers, mps, mlas, other elected representatives and other private persons holding posts under statutory bodies, public sector undertakings and the like must comply with the following requirements: file a statement of all properties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Srinivas V Vs. The Tahsildar

Court : Karnataka

..... the doctrine can never be called into play where the statute requires extensive additions and deletions. not only it is no part of the court's duty to undertake such exercise but it is beyond the jurisdiction to do so. 539274. i am, therefore, inclined to hold that the courts, though, have no power ..... haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private ..... , aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure-d .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mrs Rosamma Varghese Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the doctrine can never be called into play where the statute requires extensive additions and deletions. not only it is no part of the court's duty to undertake such exercise but it is beyond the jurisdiction to do so. 539274. i am, therefore, inclined to hold that the courts, though, have no power ..... haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. vs neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private ..... , aga and smt. kavitha h.c, hcgp) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india praying to quash the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 ('the act') and quash the proceedings in lgc (s) no.1611 of2017in karnataka land grabbing prohibition special court, kandaya bhavana ('the special court') 124 vide annexure-d .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //