Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: territorial waters continental shelf exclusive economic zone and other maritime zones act 1976 section 11 offences Page 7 of about 114 results (0.289 seconds)

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Interocean Shipping (i) (P.) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (1994)51ITD582(Delhi)

..... economic zone and other maritime zones act, 1976. he contended that by the above act the indian territory had got extended and therefore any type of commercial operation that is carried out within this extended ..... in international waters. the notification was issued extending the rights of water territory of india to the exclusive economic zone extending the territorial waters to the offshore mining for oil exploration to 200 nautical miles. he made extensive reference to the provisions of sections 6(6), 7(7) and 7(a) of the territorial waters, continental shelf, exclusive ..... the bombay high court decision in mcdermott international inc.'s case (supra). in donald william rickard's case (supra), the extension of territory of india by the territorial waters act, 1976 was examined, but we do not feel it necessary to go into this aspect because it is found that the present .....

Vijay C. Kamdar Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... (27) of the customs act, 1962, 'india' includes the territorial waters of india. as per section 2 (28) of the act indian customs waters' means the water extending into sea up to the limit of contiguous zone of india under section 5 of the territorial waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone and other maritime zones act, 1976 and includes ..... any bay, gulf, harbour, creek or tidal river. the learned counsel for the assessee contended that when the goods cross the territorial waters the export is complete and in the instance case ..... buyer. this mystery remains shrouded. the learned counsel for the assessee strongly harped upon the argument that once the goods move out of the indian territory after proper customs clearance it amount to export under the customs act. it was further argued that once the goods moves out of the indian .....

Smt. Meena Jayendra Thakur Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2533

..... act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by act 25 of 1978) which defines, indian customs waters as waters extending into sea up to the limit of contiguous zone of india under section 5 of the territorial waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone and other maritime zones act, 1976 (in short 'territorial waters act of 1976') and includes any bay, gulf, harbour, creek or tidal river, section 3 ..... of the territorial waters act states that the sovereignty of india extends and has always extended to the territorial waters of india and to the sea bed and the .....

M/S Sumitomo Heavy Industries ... Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , ministry of finance, department of revenue issued a notification on 31st march, 1983 under clauses 6(6) and 7(7) of the territorial waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone and other maritime zones act, 1976, extending income tax act, 1961 to the continental shelf of india and the exclusive economic zone with effect from 1.4.1983. hence, under the amended law, the work done under ..... date for the bid was 11.10.1982. on the date of closing of the bid, the fiscal limit of indian income-tax laws was 12 nautical miles in the territorial waters of india. the work to be done under the above mentioned tender was about 100 miles off the coast, and hence, the income arising therefrom was not subject to income .....

TIn Plate Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1987)(12)LC298Tri(Delhi)

..... and other maritime zones act, 1976, no. 80 of 1976 the limit of territorial waters is stated to be the line every point of which is ..... vessels had entered the territorial waters before the crucial date and the decision reported in the judgment of the bombay high court would apply to the present facts.9. the learned counsel also urged that the concept of territorial waters has undergone substantial change in international law. as per the territorial waters continental shelf, exclusive economic zone ..... port after that date. the decision in apar's case would not apply because the vessel arrived at bombay and entered into the territorial waters before the notification was rescinded. the vessel is normally intended to carry goods for several ports and it may touch several ports before unloading .....

Smt. Hawabi Sayed Arif Sayed Hanif Vs. L. Hmingliana, Secretary (Preve ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1991)93BOMLR673; 1992CriLJ437; 1992(1)MhLj348

..... zone and other maritime zones act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the territorial waters act, 1976) and includes any bay gulf or river. 17. the territorial waters act, 1976 defines 'territorial waters'. s. 3 of that act state that the sovereignty of ..... 'indian customs waters' as having the same meaning as in clause (28) of s. 2 of the customs act 1962. s. 2(28) of the customs act 1962 defines 'indian customs waters' as 'waters extending into sea up to the limit of contiguous zone of india u/s. 5 of the territorial waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic ..... of twenty four nautical miles from the nearest point of the baseline as set out in s. 5 of the territorial waters act, 1976. the contiguous zone extends beyond territorial waters. indian customs waters, therefore, cover an area extending to 24 nautical miles from the coastal baseline in the states specified in explanation 1 .....

Owners And Parties Interested In The Vessel M.v. Polaris Galaxy Vs. Ba ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... contained in this act: provided that the central government may, by notification, extend the jurisdiction of the high court up to the limit as defined in section 2 of the territorial waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone and other maritime zones act, 1976(80 of 1976).4. maritime claim.- (1) the high court may exercise jurisdiction to hear and determine any question on a ..... and settlement of maritime claims) act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said act). the claim is against the owners of the defendant vessel. the defendant vessel is within the territorial jurisdiction of this hon ble court. in the circumstances the plaintiff is entitled to file the present suit in rem against the defendant vessel and entitled to an order of .....

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1984)(18)ELT124Tri(Mum.)bai

..... beyond the territorial waters of the country.this also does not help the appellant as in that case too, the vessel cannot be said to be on the foreign run. besides, the definition of indian custom waters under section 2(28) of the customs act includes waters extending to the limit as defined in the continental shelf, exclusively economic ..... dated 9-10-1967, the tribunal was justified in holding that the expression 'foreign run' appearing in the said notification excludes the vessel going out beyond the territorial waters of india for the purpose of lighterage operations and therefore bunkers supplied to such vessels were not eligible for exemption from (additional) duty 5. during the ..... circumstances of the case, the bunkers supply to the vessel 'lajpatrai' which was engaged in the lighterage operations beyond 12 nautical miles i.e. beyond the indian territorial waters, was entitled to the (rebate) and exemption under notification nos. 11-ce of 5-4-1949 and 232/67, dated 9-10-1967 3. whether .....

Janavadi General Kamgar Mazdoor Union Vs. Central Institute of Fisheri ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1999(82)FLR357]; (1999)IILLJ789Bom

..... c.i.f.e. show that this institute mainly and predominantly conducts regal and sovereign functions of the state.6. reference has also been made to the provisions of the territorial waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone and other maritime zone act, 1978, in particular provisions of sections 7 and 5 thereof, in support of the contention that the institute is performing predominantly sovereign ..... view, the relevant factor is the nature of the activities being performed by the institute, and in view of the dominating nature test and other tests laid down in bangalore water supply & sewerage board v. a. rajappa. : (1978)illj349sc which still holds the field, it is not possible for us to accept the contention put forth by learned counsel for the .....

Bureau Veritas, Pride Foramer and Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... being deployed for off sea exploration in accordance with the directions of the hirer, oil & natural gas commission, and did not initially enter either indian territorial waters or any areas of the exclusive economic zone designated under the territorial waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone and other maritime zones act, 1976 to which the provisions of the customs act, 1962 (hereinafter the act) have been made ..... penalty on bureau veritas.written submissions were filed at the conclusion of the hearing.7. as we have noted the rig was purchased by the appellant to bring to the waters of india in order to fulfil its contract that it had entered into, two months earlier, with the oil & natural gas commission. both sides are agreed that this price is .....