Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tea districts emigrant lab0ur act 1932 repealed Page 1 of about 7 results (0.026 seconds)

Mar 25 1966 (HC)

Amirthammal Vs. K. Marimuthu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ506

..... in the tea districts emigrant labour act (xxii of 1932) 'adult' means a person who has completed his 16th year and a 'child ..... his wife or any legitimate or illegitimate child unable to maintain himself, it shall be lawful for a magistrate, upon due proof thereof to order such person to make a monthly allowance...the next section in that act, section 44 penalising taking or enticing away women or female children runs thus:whoever unlawfully takes away, or detains against her will, any woman or female child; or unlawfully takes, or entices away, or detains ..... is not over compulsory school age is deemed to be a child within the meaning of that enactment.under the family allowance act, 1945, the national insurance act, 1946 and the national insurance (industrial injuries) act, 1946 a person is treated as a child whilst he is under the upper limit of compulsory school age and during ..... in halsbury's laws of england, simonds edition, volume 21, at page 135 it is stated:in statutes passed for the protection of persons of immature years or dealing with their criminal acts the word 'child' is usually employed, instead of' infant' to denote such a person, the term being thus applied to persons of varying ages and contrasted with the expression ' young person ..... in the children and young persons act, 1933, which repealed and consolidated many of the previous statutes, 'child' is defined generally as a person under the age of fourteen years, and 'young person' as a person who has attained the age .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 1961 (FN)

Mcgowan Vs. Maryland

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , shows and the hiring or renting of boats, tables, chairs, beach umbrellas, on the first day of the week, commonly called sunday, within anne arundel county, and 492, 521 and 522 of this article are repealed, insofar and to the extent that they prohibit the operating of and/or the working of or employment of persons in the operation of any bathing beach, bathhouse, amusement park, dancing saloon, the sale or selling at retail of ..... of shops where street markets or (in some regions) shops were customarily opened on sunday prior to the date of the original act, 1936, where, in the latter case, the councils find that "having regard to the character and habits of the population in the district," sunday closing would cause undue hardship; but if such an exempting order is made, it must fix some weekday closing day for these shops, which may differ for different classes ..... 480 in 1936, the conflict between the economic pressures for seven-day commercial activity and the resistance to those pressures culminated in the shops (sunday trading restriction) act of that year, which, with a complex pattern of exceptions, prohibited sunday trading upon pain of penalties more severe, and hence better calculated to assure obedience, than the nominal fines which had obtained ..... 134, 41; sunday entertainments act, 1932, 22 & 23 geo. v, c. 51, ..... the sunday entertainments act, 1932, 22 & 23 geo. ..... 20, exempting hackney coaches; the sunday entertainments act, 1932, 22 & 23 geo. v, c ..... . 8 (1932) (unspecified ..... 1932 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2003 (FN)

Demore Vs. Kim

Court : US Supreme Court

..... ii because 1226(e) plainly deprives courts of federal habeas jurisdiction over claims that mandatory detention under 1226(c) is unconstitutional, one could conceivably argue that such a repeal violates the suspension clause, which provides as follows: "the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it." u. s ..... as the united states pointed out in its own carlson brief, that issue was never presented, since the district director's exercise of discretion was based on individualized determinations that the petitioners were dangerous to society. ..... in deciding in salerno that this principle did not categorically bar pretrial detention of criminal defendants without bail under the bail reform act of 1984, it was crucial that the statute provided that, "[i]n a full-blown adversary hearing, the government must convince a neutral decisionmaker by clear and convincing evidence that no conditions of release can reasonably assure the safety of ..... immigration judge had not yet held an initial hearing on the substantive issue of removability when kim filed his habeas petition in the district court, even though kim had been detained for over three months under 1226(c). ..... 531 what longer than the average-spending six months in ins custody prior to the district court's order granting habeas relief, but respondent himself had requested a continuance of his removal ..... 22 , 62 (1932); accord, zadvydas, supra, at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 1975 (SC)

Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Shri Raj NaraIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC2299; 1975(Supp)SCC1; [1976]2SCR347

..... 1971 along with note a43, the material part of which reads as under:you are requested to kindly write a letter with your recommendation to the election officer so that the cars taken by the district congress committee may be released, i have tried to find out shri vidyadhar vajpayee who is contesting the election from amethi parliamentary constituency and shri baiznath kureel who is contesting the election from ..... i am unable to see how exercise of the jurisdiction to determine an election dispute, which was in accordance with article 329(b), already vested in the high court by the act of 1951 for all elections to house of the people, could not only be taken away by a constitutional amendment, purporting to repeal retrospectively the provisions of the act of 1951, a piece of ordinary legislation, in their application to particular class of cases, but at the same time, making a declaration of the rights of ..... and her election agent obtained the assistance of a number of gazetted officers and members of the police force for the furtherance of her election prospects in as much as the services of the district magistrate, superintendent of police rae bareli and the home secretary, uttar pradesh government were utilised for the purposes of the construction of rostrums and installation of loudspeakers at various places within the ..... abeyesekera's case 1932 ac 260 (supra) is an authority for the proposition that the legal infirmity can be removed and active indemnity can be ..... ; khyerban tea .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2018 (SC)

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council of 27 april 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46/ec (general data protection regulation) page 255 of 567 writ petition (civil) no.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters eugdpr which was enacted by the eu in 2016 came into force on may 25, ..... the european parliament and of the council of 27 april 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46/ec (general data protection regulation) page 260 of 567 writ petition (civil) no.494 of 2012 & c onnected matters the collection, storage and use of biometric data which have been taken note of ..... the state governments and the police forces cannot obtain the information contained in the cidr or the authentication records except in two situations contemplated by section 33 (i) when the district judge orders so after giving an opportunity of hearing to the authority (even in this situation core biometric information will not be shared; and (ii) in the interest of national security writ petition ..... court held that by virtue of section 58, all things done and actions taken under the repealed ordinance are deemed to be done or taken in exercise of the powers conferred by the repealing act, as if that act were in force on the day on which that thing was done or action was ..... . .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 1998 (FN)

New Jersey Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

..... jurisdiction over an action for assault allegedly committed on the islandy in 1931, the united states court of appeals for the third circuit, which includes new jersey, held that the district court for the district of n ew jersey did not have jurisdiction over a habeas corpus petition filed by an alien detained on the island.12 the federal judges sitting in 10 the master discounted this ..... when the united states added landfill to them.7 7 prior to 1891, new jersey law permitted littoral owners to extend their land artificially by filling in or docking out; in 1891, however, new jersey repealed that law and enacted a new statement providing that "without the grant or permission of [the new jersey riparian commissioners] no person or corporation shall fill in, build upon or make any erection on or ..... since new york made no effort to update its description of voting districts to eliminate the reference to oyster island, never specifically indicated an intent to include the filled land in its voting districts, and failed to make any alteration in its representation of the island on its voting maps, its legislative acts were not overtly prescriptive and furnished no reason for new jersey to infer that new york intended ..... from maps obtained by us of the department of conservation and development of the state of new jersey, the latest edition of which was printed and revised in 1932 [sic] show specifically that this island is entirely within the boundary lines of the state of new jersey. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2014 (FN)

Schuette Vs. Bamn

Court : US Supreme Court

..... court to rule that the question addressed by michigan voters is too sensitive or complex to be within the grasp of the electorate; or that the policies at issue remain too delicate to be resolved save by university officials or faculties, acting at some remove from immediate public scru-tiny and control; or that these matters are so arcane that the electorate s power must be limited because the people cannot prudently exercise that power even after a ..... section 26 states, in relevant part, as follows: (1) the university of michigan, michigan state university, wayne state university, and any other public college or university, community college, or school district shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or ..... vote, restraints on the dissemination of information, interferences with political organizations, and prohibition of peaceable assembly, the court recognized that legislation which restricts those political processes which can ordinarily be expected to bring about repeal of undesirable legislation could be worthy of more exacting judicial scrutiny under the general prohibitions of the fourteenth amendment than are most other types of legislation. id. ..... lulac, a voting rights act case, involved an enactment by the texas legislature that redrew district lines for a number of texas seats in the house ..... (1932). .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //