Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2001(128)ELT330(MP)
..... .(e) the department has the responsibility to lift the veil or pierce through the veil to find out the real relationship between the two companies. the petitioner company had given an impression to the department that the transaction was principal to principal basis but as an actual fact when everything got revealed it ..... 1994 the central excise department was investigating the relationship between the pghp and pgil and they had fully applied their mind about the relationship between the two companies. the entire facts about the relationship were clearly submitted and were known to the central excise department. as put forth in the writ petition the superintendent ..... factory at mandideep, raisen. it is engaged in . (hereinafter referred to as 'pgil') till 31-10-1993. thereafter it is being marketed by another company called procter and gamble home products limited (hereinafter referred to as 'pghp'). in the month of november, 1993 pgil divested the business of ariel detergent powder .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : AIR2002MP62; 2002(1)MPHT84; 2002(2)MPLJ195
..... the conclusion that neither the widest interpretation nor the narrow interpretations canvassed before us are acceptable. the interpretation which was accepted by the majority in theatiabari tea company case (supra) is correct but subject to its clarification. regulatory measures are measures imposing compensatory taxes for the use of trading facilities do not ..... to these cases. similarly, decision in automobile transport (rajasthan) limited etc. v. state of rajasthan and ors. (air 1962 sc 1406) explains decision inatiabari tea company case (supra), and it is said in paragraph 14 thus:'14. after carefully considering the arguments advanced before us, we have come to the conclusion that ..... of 20 paise per unit. under section 44 of the act of 1948, obtaining of prior written consent from the electricity board before establishment or acquisition of generating set is necessary. it does not provide that the person so authorised to generate and utilise electricity from the generating sets would do .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. Writ Petition No.1759/2013 S.D.Tiwari and another. -Versus- Union of India and otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi. Shri Naman Nagrath, learned Senior counsel assisted by Shri Prakash Upadhyay, learned counsel for petitioneRs.Shri S.A.Dharmadhikari, learned counsel for respondent No.1. Ms.Anjana Goswami Advocate and Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3. Shri R.N.Singh, learned Senior counsel assisted by Shri V.P.Nema and Shri Rahul Diwakar, Advocate, for the interveneRs.ORDER ( .9.2013) 1: This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the two petitioners is directed against the order dated 10/17.10.2012 passed by the respondent No.1-Union of India, in Ministry of Civil Aviation, whereby a direction is given to fix the seniority of the merged employees and officers of International Airports Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as IAAI for brevity) and National Airports...
Tag this Judgment!