Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tea companies acquisition and transfer of sick tea units act 1985 chapter i preliminary Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 8 results (0.191 seconds)

Amar Nath and 82 ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1698; [2004]56SCL529(All)

..... of industrial finance and re-construction. after various meetings, attended by the banks and the representatives of workers' union, the corporation was declared as 'sick industrial company' on 21.8.1995 under section 3(1)(o) of the sick industries (special provisions) act, 1985. after deliberations, the bifr sanctioned a rehabilitation scheme on ..... the category of wage board employees. by government order dated 29.1.2001, u. p. state sugar and cane development corporation limited, was constituted as subsidiary company of the corporation, comprising of 18 units (including all the closed units). apart from closing down 11 units of the corporation, 8 more units were declared ..... scheme submitted by the corporation for revival/ rehabilitation of its units. it was proposed that the 11 closed units shall be transferred to newly created subsidiary company of the corporation, and then the same shall be privatised in phased manner. the employees of these closed units were to be given an invitation to .....

Raja Suryapalsingh and ors. Vs. the U.P. Govt.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All674

..... delegated falls under the head of what we have described as supplementary legislation, intended to make effective the general principles contained in those chapters. section 305 authorises acquisition of the interest of a person holding an uneconomic holding on payment of compensation, by which term we understand is meant its equivalent monetary value. the details ..... a matter for the legislature. classification on a reasonable basis is not bad because it is not done with mathematical accuracy -- (see stuart lindsley v. natural carbonic gas company, (1911) 55 law, edn. 369 at p. 377) & further there is a presumption that the legislature knows correctly about the needs of the people and the ..... discrimination by it must be deemed to be on adequate grounds (see charlie middleton v. texas power and light company, (1919) 63 law, edn. 527 at p. 581. it is further pointed out in jessie norton torrence magoun v. hinds trust and savings bank, (1898) .....

Ajeet Singh Alias Muraha Son of Vijay Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007CriLJ170

..... the possession of the vehicle with a guilty intention.49. in jagdish chandra nijhawan v. s.k. saraf : 1999crilj268 , the hon'ble supreme court dealt with a case wherein the company had provided an accommodation to its employee and after termination of his services, he did not vacate the said accommodation and a criminal case was lodged against him under sections ..... 406, 408, 409, i.p.c. also taking the assistance of section 630 of the companies act, 1956. the hon'ble apex court held that as the accused had been granted a rent free accommodation as a part of the conditions of employment, the agreement provided .....

Ram Shree Steels Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dakshinanchal Vidyut Vitran Ni ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC851

..... effect by virtue of any law other than this act.(2) where there has been under any scheme under this act an amalgamation of a sick industrial company with another company, the provisions of selection 72a of the income-tax act, 1961 (43 of 1961), shall, subject to the modifications that the power of the central ..... and the petitioners' unit was on the verge of collapse, as such, they moved before the board for industrial and financial reconstruction under the provisions of sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985. the board was pleased to declare the petitioners' unit as sick unit and accordingly preparation of a rehabilitation package is in the offing ..... the subsidy in the regular monthly bills. the dues towards 50% of the subsidy amount cannot be realized by the respondents in view of the sick industrial companies (sub provision) act, 1985 and neither the respondents are pressing for payment of the aforesaid amount shown in the bills. since the respondents were pressing for .....

Narendra Road Lines Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Up, and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... meters) of land in plot no. 1163m by five sale deeds.11. shri b.d. mandhyan submits that jaypee infratech limited (the company) is a private company. the acquisition of land for a private company cannot be treated to be public purpose. the notification suffers from colourable exercise of power by the government and is malafide. under the contract ..... it is not open to the petitioners therefore to again challenge the same project on the grounds of vagueness, malafides and on the ground that the acquisition is for a company..84. in the new economic era beginning with 1991, a large number of projects have been undertaken by the state governments in partnership with private ..... be finalized by the jv/spv in consultation with tea.1.10 the land offered by tea along the expressway for development on lease at a premium equivalent to acquisition cost and lease rent of rs. 100/- per hectare per year for a period of 90 years. the jv company/spv could further lease out the developed/underdeveloped .....

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... holders have accepted compensation under the agreement. the writ petition is barred by latches. it is further pleaded that in-fact the acquisition is for company and should have been made in accordance with land acquisition (companies) rule 1963. petitioners came to know in the year 2011 that the land of village ithara will not be used for ..... authority and interveners have made much emphasis on the submission that the change of land use was subsequent to acquisition, the allotment to various private parties/companies were much after acquisition which shall have no effect on the acquisition of land and the relevant time is the date of issue of notification under section 4 read with sections ..... p. zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950 in the year 1991 and the said plots were purchased by the petitioners company for purpose of plotting and sale. the proposal for acquisition was sent in the year 2003 and the notification under section 4 of the act was issued in the year 2008. the land .....

Dr. A.K. Bansal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in : (2000)73ITD49(All.)

..... to which such legislature has power to make laws. (2) the matters referred to in clause (1) are the following, namely :- (d) land reforms by way of acquisition by the state of any estate, as defined in article 31a or of any rights therein or the extinguishment of modification of any such rights or by way of ceiling ..... being effected through the allied business of madan mohan damma mal who were the sole selling agents of the petitioner firm which was not accounted for in the company's books of account ... that the petitioner was maintaining duplicate sets of accounts which were different from the books which were being produced before the income-tax department ..... & managing director of m/s. microland and also microland ltd., were mentioned. the learned counsel for the assessee has verbally stated that the name of the assessee-company was interplated at a later point of time. from a thorough examination of the photocopy of the search warrant, we also feel that there is some scope for suspecting .....

Vipul Gupta (Dr.) Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary, Medical Educati ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC3070

..... redetermined is held to be implicit in the act, the same for all intent and purport would amount to invoking the provisions of section 2 8-a of the land acquisition act indirectly which cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly.35. the right to get the amount of compensation redetermined must expressly be provided by the statute. such a .....