Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: taxation laws amendment act 2007 section 9 omission of section 4 Court: chhattisgarh Page 1 of about 180 results (0.116 seconds)

Dec 05 2014 (HC)

M/s. Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Anoth ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... by the producer or the distributor as the case may be. 35. (i) the constitutional validity of section 3 of central province and berar electricity duty act, 1959 as amended by madhya pradesh taxation law (amendment) act, 1956 came to be considered before the division bench of the madhya pradesh high court in case of j. c. mills, gwalior vs. state of m ..... electrical energy, whether for his own consumption or for supplying to others. paragraph five of the report states as under: 5. the point to note is that under the amended act it is not merely "a distributor" that is liable, but a producer also. to make the matter still clearer the statute has defined "producer" as one who ..... .p.[air 1963 sc 414]). the constitution bench considering section 3a of the c.p. berar electricity duty act as amended by act no.7 of 1956 (section 3a of that act which is parimateria provision to section 3 of the ed act, 1949) it has been held that the generation of the electrical energy by the producer is not the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2011 (HC)

Asit Kumar Sen Gupta Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... to find out what other provisions in the constitution have expectations from its citizens about their duty for the country. 60. article 51a inserted by 42nd constitutional amendment act, 1976 defines fundamental duties of the citizen. clauses (a), (b), (c), (i) of article 51a of the constitution provide thus:- ""(a) to ..... regards these decisions of the american court's it should be borne in mind that though the first amendment to the constitution of the united states reading "congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech...."appears to confer no power on the congress to impose any restriction on the ..... " includes disloyalty and all feelings of enmity. explanation2. - comments expressing disapprobation of the measures of the government with a view to obtain their alteration by lawful means, without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. explanation3. - comments expressing disapprobation of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2014 (TRI)

Sks Ispat and Power Limited Vs. Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head O ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... related to direct or indirect taxation :- 1. to apply for registration, renewal / amendment of registration certificates as may be necessary for the business of the company under the provisions of central excise act, finance act, custom act, income tax act, state sales tax / vat, central sales tax act, 1956, entry tax and professional tax act and any other act of similar nature of ..... cannot claim compensation against theft from the insurance company. (para 6). it is not open to interpret the expression appearing in policy in terms of common law; but it has to give meaning to the expression reproduced the terms of the policy as also the definition of burglary and / or housebreaking as defined ..... ., iv (2011) cpj 458 (nc), hon'ble national commission observed that "it is to be noted that it is in accordance with the requirement of law that a surveyor is required to be appointed by the insurance company and when such a surveyor who is licensed professional to assess such loss gives a report .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2005 (HC)

Minor Dipika and Etc. Vs. C.G. State Electricity Board and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2007Chh1

..... allow the party to produce a witness though he may not have been summoned through the court. rule 1a which was introduced by the code of civil procedure (amendment) act, 1976 with effect from 1.2.1977 has placed the matter beyond doubt by providing in clear and specified terms that any party to the suit may bring ..... purpose the petitioners have shown sufficient cause. accordingly, the orders impugned passed by learned district judge, raigarh are perverse and not in consonance with the settled principles of law and legal provisions contained under rule 1 of order 16, therefore, same are liable to be quashed.22. in the result, for the foregoing reasons, the writ ..... her next friend ganesh dhoba against the c.g. state electricity board are being disposed of by the common order, as in these writ petitions similar question of law is involved.2. by these writ petitions the petitioners have questioned the legality, propriety and correctness of orders dated 10.8.2005 passed by learned district judge, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2006 (HC)

Mohd. Akbar Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2007Chh39; 2007(2)MPHT1

..... . if registrar grabs the valuable right and power of the society/ committee/or voters, he can be dealt with in accordance with law.26. vide amendment act no. 3 of ] 982 the provision of section 49(7-aa) of the act has been included and by its inclusion, state government was wrapped with an authority to extend the term of the committee or a ..... extend the assistance by the state including state partnership, wherever necessary, it has been felt that a new law on co-operation may be enacted.6. further, vide amendment act no. 12 of 1994, the objects of the act, 1960 was substituted as below:an act to organize and develop co-operatives as democratic instruments and people's institutions based on self help, and mutual .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2007 (HC)

Smt. Sarla Devi Gupta Vs. Smt. Tara Devi Dubey

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2007(4)MPHT54(CG)

..... is materially different from the description of the accommodation given originally in schedule 'a'. both the courts below also failed to notice that the respondent/plaintiff by amending the plaint had changed the description of the accommodation from 'house-cum-shop' to 'suit shop only' and had specifically pleaded in para 3 that only ..... residence for the suit shop. in appeal, the learned vhith additional district judge, bilaspur, without application of judicial mind to the pleadings as also to the amendment introduced by the plaintiff on 1-10-2001 while reversing the judgment and decree passed by the lower court, granted a decree for eviction of the appellant/ ..... required the accommodation only for her residence. therefore, a decree for eviction of the appellant/defendant--tenant under section 12(1)(e) of the act could not be granted under law. it was also urged that the pleadings of the respondent/plaintiff did not specifically show the purpose for which the suit accommodation was let out, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2009 (HC)

Chintamani Vs. Sapan Kumar Das

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2009(2)MPHT79(CG)

..... comes to the conclusion that the landlord predominantly requires the accommodation for residential purpose, then a decree for eviction under section 12 (1) (e) of the act could be passed. on the other hand, if the court comes to the conclusion that the landlord predominantly requires the accommodation for non-residential purpose, a decree for ..... the respondent and the finding in that respect of the first appellate court is sustainable in law ?(3) whether the first appellate court was wrong in dismissing the application of the tenant under order 6 rule 17 of the cpc for amending his written statement ?7. shri h.s. patel, learned counsel for the appellant/defendant ..... 1987 in civil suit no. 55-a/1987, decreed the respondent/plaintiff's suit for eviction under section 12(1)(e) of the chhattisgarh accommodation control act, 1961 (henceforth 'the act'). the appeal preferred by the appellant/tenant (civil appeal no. 10-a/1989) was also dismissed by the ist additional judge to the district judge, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2007 (HC)

Ram Prasad Agrawal Vs. Rammanohar Soni

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2008(1)MPHT1(CG)

..... let the chabutara and open land in front of the suit accommodation to one moti halwai for doing the business of sweets. it was also pleaded by an amendment incorporated subsequently in the year 1995 that the appellant/defendant had sub-let the suit accommodation for purposes of business and was not in occupation of the suit accommodation ..... court should reveal application of mind to the grounds of challenge to the finding recorded by the trial court.18. so far as the second substantial question of law is concerned, it is pertinent to notice that the respondent/plaintiff had admitted in para 27 of his testimony that he had not sent any information to the ..... had, on a proper consideration of the entire evidence and the subsequent conduct of the parties, recorded a finding wholly consistent with law that the ground for eviction under section 12(1)(b) of the act, 1961 was established. therefore, the lower appellate court was not required to enter upon a re-appraisal of the evidence and general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2008 (HC)

Tapan Kumar Rai Vs. Ashok Kumar Rai

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2008(3)MPHT6(CG)

..... , i.e., before the written statement was filed on 31-1-1995, the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court was enhanced from rs. 10,000/- to rs. 25,000/- by amending act 5 of 1994, the impugned judgment and decree ought not to be unsettled merely on the ground that on the date of institution of the suit the court had no ..... and pecuniary jurisdictions are concerned, objection to such jurisdiction has to be taken at the earliest possible opportunity and in any case at or before settlement of issues. the law is well settled on the point that if such objection is not taken at the earliest, it cannot be allowed to be taken at a subsequent stage. jurisdiction as ..... non-applicant/plaintiff from the suit shop could not be discarded merely on the ground that he was an interested witness. thus, no perversity, illegality or manifest error of law is seen in the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned civil judge class ii.15. in the result, the revision being devoid of any merit is dismissed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2007 (HC)

Nandkishore Agrawal Vs. Smt. Meena Agrawal and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2007Chh110

..... , or where the consent of the guardian in marriage of the petitioner (was required under section 5 as it stood immediately before the commencement of the child marriage restraint (amendment) act, 1978 (2 of 1978), the consent of such guardian was obtained by force (or by fraud as to the nature of the ceremony or as to any material fact ..... by her is of such a kind or such an extent that it is impossible for her to lead a normal married life. this is the requirement of the law as appears on a fair reading of the statutory provisions. merely giving a finding that the respondent-wife was suffering from some mental disorder and she did not have ..... cohabitation with her husband during the period they stayed together is not sufficient to comply with the condition prescribed under section 5(ii)(b) of the act.14. thus, merely showing that the respondent was undertaking treatment from dr. prakash narayan shukla for some mental disorder would not constitute the ground under section 12(1)(b .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //