Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: taxation laws amendment act 2007 section 11 omission of second schedule Court: delhi Page 79 of about 789 results (0.188 seconds)

Gopal Singh Bisht vs.central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... person any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage without any public interest. , do not stand in existence as of date in view of the amendment to the prevention of corruption act, 1988 vide the amendment acts 2016 & 2018 brought into play w.e.f. 26.07.2018, the same does not in any event obliterate the alleged commission ..... aliunde by evidence that those facts were placed before the sanctioning authority (major som nath vs. uoi1971cr.l.j1422. there is no requirement in law to mention the provisions of act for which prosecution sanction is being granted. the same can be also inferred by the recital in the order or from the accompanying documents. ..... circular in question is dated 9.2.1988 the relevant portion reads as follows :"the government also decided that before giving approval of prosecutions, the principal secretary, law and legal deptt. will obtain the advise of concerned department." a bare perusal of the paragraph shows that before giving approval for prosecution, advice of the .....

Ht Media Limited vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... and to consequent evisceration, under article 226 of the constitution of india.30. significantly, section 10 of the id act was amended, vide section 3 of the industrial disputes (amendment) act, 1952. whereas sub- section (1), of the pre-amended section 10, contemplated making of reference, by the appropriate government, of an industrial dispute, to the labour court or ..... opinion, and cannot make an order in blank and delegate to the taxing master to tax and then fill in the amount of costs allowed by him on taxation . in allcroft v. london (bishop), (1891) ac666 lord bramwell declared that if a man is to form an opinion and his opinion is to govern, ..... conclusion on those matters.14. when the appropriate government makes a reference of an industrial dispute for adjudication, it does not decide any question of fact or law. the only condition, which the exercise of that power should satisfy, the existence or apprehension of an industrial dispute. when once the government is satisfied about .....

income-tax Officer Vs. R.K. Sawhney, J.L. Sawhney and

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (1982)2ITD207(Delhi)

..... to point out that so far as the flats in a multi-storeyed building belonging to a co-operative society is concerned, there is no difficulty. prior to the amendment of section 27, whereby a member of the house building co-operative society shall be deemed to be the owner of the flat, by executive instructions, the central ..... to assessment of income from house property. every kind of income is sought to be brought in the net of taxation by the income-tax act. the charging section under the 1961 act is section 4. this brings to charge the total income of the previous year of every person. the total income may consist of income from different sources ..... of the rules and regulations that the said company may adopt at its inception and from time to time conforming to the building rules and the municipal bye-laws and the strict observance of the various stipulations and conditions laid down by the said company respecting the use and occupation of the particular tenements by particular member .....

C.M. Grover Vs. Kartar Singh Phool Singh

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT240b

..... any statement made by kirpal singh to that effect.(27) during the time the evidence was being recorded, the objectorsfiled an application for amendment of the issues. by my order dated february15, 1980, i amended issue no. 1 as- under : 'whetherthe award of the arbitrator js without jurisdiction in asmuch as there was no valid or binding ..... .(14) before filing the rejoinder, the objectors filed an application under order 6, rule 17 civil procedure code (i.a. 1669/1978) for amendment of the objections.the objections sought to be added by way of amendment was : 'theobjector/respondent no. 2 used to purchase the goods againstthe bills issued by respondent no. 1. the terms and conditions ..... that theobjector had concealed that the arbitration agreement between the parties didexist, but that it was not tenable in law as it was not a valid arbitration agreement in terms of ss. 2 and 33 of the act. the learned single judge took theview that since the clause had not been assailed on the ground that the .....

Bharat Carpets Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1978(2)ELT111(Del)

..... such carpets were livable under tariff item no. 21 read with notification no. 50/62 dated 24.04.1962 as amended.12. against the said order, the plaintiff filed an appeal to the collector under section 35 of the act, which was dismissed on 1st may 1s71 (annexure i). the plaintiff then preferred a revision petition to the government of ..... bombay : [1963]49itr135(bom) and installment supply pvt. ltd. and anr. v. union of india and ors. : [1962]2scr644 and has tried to impress that in matters of taxation, there is no question of rest judicata because if fresh matter comes to the notice of the taxing authority, it then has the power to re-assess or reconsider the ..... action of the department was wholly illegal and the civil court has jurisdiction to take cognisance of the matter and provide a remedy to the aggrieved person under the common, law. issue nos. 1 to 6 are accordingly decided in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant.issue no. 7 .30. this issue covers another aspect of the .....

Sudha Rani and anr. Vs. Post Master General and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)554; 81(1999)DLT367; 1999(51)DRJ91; 1999RLR498

..... for the petitioner has cited ch. surat singh (dead) & ors. vs . manohar lal & ors, : air1971sc240 . 4. the next contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner was that after amendment of delhi rent control act in 1988, it is not all appeals from the orders of the addl. rent controller would be appealable but the appeal arising only on a question of ..... the facts of the case was not warranted in law. 5. on the other hand, mr. shashtri, leaned counsel for the respondent no. 4 has contended that the site plan which was filed by the petitioner was vague. he has further contended that as a matter of fact slum areas (improvement & clearance) act, 1956 was applicable to the premises in question and .....

Om Prakash Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT686

..... life or imprisonment for a term of ten years or more.there is another reason which supports my above conclusion. on the date when the amendment in section 167 was brought about (act no. 45 of 1978) there was no offence in the indian penal code which was punishable with imprisonment for a minimum term of ten years ..... be punishable with imprisonment of ten years or more. mr. lekhi contended that the amendment was introduced keeping in mind the laws that the legislature intended to enact in future. i do not agree in this contention. the amendments in the procedural laws are usually made to meet lacunae and the difficulties which are being faced and the ..... have ten (sic) peremptory challenges if offences charged is 'punishable' with death or by life imprisonment; means deserving of or liable to punishment; capable of being punished by law or right, may be punished, or liable to be punished, and not must be punished. 10. corpus jurisdiction secundum gives the meaning as :'deserving of, or liable .....

Rajeev Chaudhary Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2023; 86(2000)DLT203; 2000(54)DRJ722

..... conclusion that learned judge pointed out the following reasons also :'there is another reason which supports my above conclusion. on the date when the amendment in section 167 was brought about (act no. 45 of 1978) there was no offence in the indian penal code which was punishable with imprisonment for a minimum term of ..... punishable with imprisonment of ten years or more. mr. lekhi contended that the amendment was introduced keeping in mind the laws that the legislature intended to enact in future. i do not agree in this contention. the amendments in the procedural laws are usually made to meet lacunae and the difficulties which are being faced and ..... the key word used in this clause, in my opinion, is 'punishable'. it governs all the three punishments referred to in clause (i). according to black's law dictionary fifth edition, 'punishable' means 'deserving of or capable or liable to punishment'. the word 'punishable' thus, denotes maximum punishment. the expression 'an offence punishable .....

Suresh Chand Sharma Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... the offence punishable under section 302 ipc for committing murder of p.v.v.s. murthy. the appellant was given an opportunity to recall the witnesses examined before the amendment of charge. the appellant declined to recall any of the witnesses and the trial proceeded further. 7. in order to establish its case, the prosecution examined 17 witnesses. ..... standing while the appellant allegedly tried to escape. 27. we do not find these discrepancies to be material so as to affect the prosecution case in view of the law laid down in leela ram (supra) and dr. sunil kumar sambhudayal (supra). 28. similarly the conduct of the three eye witnesses in not snatching the country made ..... inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death; or knowledge (c) with the knowledge that the (4) with the knowledge that the act is so act is likely to cause death. imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and without any .....

Kartar Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... of finger in the private part of the child victim. it may be noted here that the case pertains to the year 2001, i.e. prior to the amendment in section 375 ipc. once this court has formed an opinion that on the basis of evidence available on record, no offence of rape is proved against the appellant ..... maharashtra (1997) crlj1724(bom) the high court of bombay observed as under: the accused were alleged to have kidnapped the girl below 16 years of age from the lawful guardianship of her parents and taken her to another city. the coaccused had simply met the girl and had not instigated her to accompany the accused. hence, her conviction ..... a charge under section 306 ipc and, therefore, they are prejudiced by not framing a charge under section 306 ipc; therefore, presumption under section 113a of indian evidence act cannot be drawn and consequently a conviction under section 306 ipc cannot be awarded. according to this court, in the facts and circumstances, section 306 was attracted and the .....