Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: taxation laws amendment act 2001 section 4 amendment of section 10 Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 8,995 results (0.200 seconds)

Aug 17 2006 (HC)

Cit Vs. P.D. Singhania

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2006]156TAXMAN504(All)

..... month) as may be prescribed having regard to the area or place in which such accommodation is situate and other relevant considerations.'9. the explanation which was inserted by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1984 with effect from 1-4-1976 reads as under :'explanation.for the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in a ..... him, whatever may have been position regarding grant of exemption under section 10(13a) of the act, in view of the explanation which was inserted by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1984 with effect from 1-4-1976 the provisions of sub-section (13a) of section 10 of the act cannot be applied in the case where the residential accommodation occupied by the assessee is owned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 2005 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi Jain

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2006]280ITR500(All)

..... body has appeared on behalf of the respondent-assessee.6. learned standing counsel submitted that in view of the amendment made to sub-section (8) of section 139 of the act by insertion of explanation (2) by the taxation laws (amendment) act, with effect from 1.4.1985 even an assessment made for the first time under section 147 is to be ..... treated as regular assessment. similar provision has been made in section 217 of the act. relying upon the decision of the apex court ..... income tax (appeals) has been upheld by the tribunal on the ground that prior to 1.4.1989 i.e. before the amendment of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 271 of the act, re-assessment proceeding cannot be treated as regular assessment. tribunal has upheld the order of the deputy commissioner of income tax (appeals). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1988 (TRI)

Rajendra Automobiles Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in : (1988)25ITD555(All.)

..... should be imposed as prescribed under the statute at the time when the order imposing penalty was made, that is to say, in accordance with the law as it stood after amendment by the taxation laws (amendment) act with effect from 1-4-1976, since the income-tax officer passed the penalty order on 18-3-1980, while the return was filed on ..... tax appellate tribunal nominated the third member, who vide his order dated 15-1-1988 held that the penalty is leviable in accordance with law prior to the amendment of section 271(1)(iii) by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1975 which came into effect from 1-4-1976 as the concealment in this case was made on 21-8-1975 when the ..... , the decision of the supreme court in the case of brij mohan (supra), i hold that the penalty is leviable in accordance with law prior to the amendment of section 271(1)(iii) by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1975 which came into effect from 1-4-1976 as the concealment, in this case was made on 21-8-1975 when the return .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1971 (HC)

Smt. Kusum Kumari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1972]85ITR19(All)

..... and it is not for the court, we think, to supply the omission and complete it. it appears that the omission was noticed recently, and in the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1970, section 38 substitutes for the original section 221(1) a new sub-section clearly mentioning the income-tax officer as the authority empowered to impose penalty. section ..... observations were made in that case do not exist before us. the objection is overruled.16. it was then urged that there was no apparent error of law or of jurisdiction and, therefore, a writ in the nature of certiorari should not be granted. upon the finding that the income-tax officer had no power ..... in failing to pay the amount of advance tax demanded. the petitioner applied in revision to the commissioner of income-tax under section 264(1) of the act against the order of the appellate assistant commissioner concerning the first penalty order and also directly against the second and third penalty orders. theadditional commissioner of income-tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2005 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Zam Zam Tanners

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(All)221; [2005]279ITR197(All)

..... the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income for the purposes of clause (c) of this subsection.'section 271(1)(c) of the act after the amendment by taxation laws (amendment) act, 1975, w.e.f. 1st april, 1976 reads as follows :'section 271--failure to furnish returns, comply with notices, concealment of income, etc.--(1 ..... have been concealed.'14. we find that the words 'in addition to any tax payable by him' in clause (iii) also exist after the amendment by taxation laws (amendment) act, 1975. in the amended clause (iii) further words 'sum which shall not be less than but which shall not exceed three times the amount of tax sought to be ..... & haryana high court and the decision of the apex court is also applicable to the assessment year after 1st april, 1976 to which the amended section 271(1)(c) by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1975, is applicable. the decision of the apex court is binding under article 141 of the constitution of india.15. it may also .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2005 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rajni Kant Dave

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2006)201CTR(All)324; [2006]281ITR6(All)

..... appeal and held as follows:'coming to the merits, the assessee was carrying on medical profession and was obliged to maintain account as per section 44aa of the act. this provision was introduced by taxation laws (amendment) act, 1975 with effect from 1.4.1975. earlier it had been held in certain cases like p. appavi pillai v. c.i.t. : [1965]58itr622(mad) that ..... number of film consumed with total receipt. in our opinion, this cannot be the basis for invoking the provision of section 145(i) of the act.11. section 44aa of the act has been introduced by taxation law amendment act, 1975 w.e.f 1.4.1975, which required person carrying on the medical profession to keep and maintain such books of account and other documents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1996 (HC)

Ramapati Singhania (Legal Heir of Late Gopal Krishna Singhania) Vs. Co ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1997)139CTR(All)210; [1998]234ITR655(All); [1998]97TAXMAN36(All)

..... with a notice under section 156 within the prescribed period and, admittedly, there was a default on his part. sub-section (2a) was inserted in section 220 of the act by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1984, with effect from october 1, 1984. that provision initially provided that notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2), the board may reduce or waive the amount of interest ..... inquiry relating to the assessment or any proceeding for recovery of any amount due from him,8. the said provision came to be amended by the taxation laws (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1986, with effect from april 1, 1987, and amongst other amendments with which we are not concerned in this writ petition, in the opening portion the word 'commissioner' was substituted for 'board' and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 1970 (HC)

The State of U.P. and anr. Vs. the Bar Council of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1971All186

..... called the amendment act, 1969), section 1 (3) of this act provides that the act shall come into force on such date as the state government may by notification in the gazette appoint in that behalf ..... that the u. p. stamp (amendment) act, 1962, is ultra vires the state legislature.5. the present appeal has been filed by the state of u. p. and the junior secretary, board of revenue, against the judgment of the learned judge. during pendency of the appeal the state legislature has passed the uttar pradesh taxation laws amendment act, 1969 (u. p. act no. xi of 1969) (hereinbelow .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1960 (HC)

Dr. Sir Syed Raza Ali Khan Bahadur Nawab of Rampur Vs. Income Tax Offi ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1961All280

..... one ground urged by learned counsel is based on the provisions contained in section 3(2) of the taxation laws (extension to merged states and amendment) act, 1949 (act no. lxvii of 1949). it was by this act that the provisions of the indian income-tax act were extended to the area which previously comprised the state of rampur and which, after merger, formed ..... clear that we express no such 'opinion, that sub-section (2) of section 3 of this act is not valid in so far as it extends and enforces the indian ..... of the state of rampur in uttar pradesh.the indian income-tax act was extended to, and was enforced in the merged area of the state of rampur, by the provision contained in sub-section (1) of section 3 of the taxation laws (extension to merged states and amendment) act, 1949. even if it be held, though we may make it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 1956 (HC)

Jugal Kishore Baldeo Sahai Vs. the Income-tax Officer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1956All670; [1956]30ITR600(All)

..... 52 to 1954-55. the section vesting gower in the income-tax officer to make a provisional assessment was introduced for the first time by the taxation laws (extension to alerged states and amendment) act, 1949.2. it is urged on behalf of the applicant that the provisional assessment under section 23b could not be made by the income-tax ..... the nagpur high court that the section was not retrospective enough to cover the assessments made prior to the date mentioned in the act. there is no such provision in the taxation laws (extension to merged states and amendment) act, 1949. the principle applied in the decision of the nagpur case does not apply to the facts of the present case.3 ..... empowering the commissioner to revise the order made by the income-tax officer was the subject matter of the decision.there was a provision in the amending act relating to the newly introduced section which clearly showed that the new section was to be deemed to be operative in respect of certain assessments made .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //