Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the light of aforestated discussion, we have summarized our conclusion as under: (a) we uphold the constitutional validity of the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 2014) as amended by act 30 of 2020 except to the extent of striking down part of sub-section (4) of section 9 namely: but additional evidence, ..... the special court has filed his statement of objections and brought to the notice of the special court about the notice issued on 650 12.01.2016 by the fourth respondent herein alleging encroachment of the government lake, for which, reply dated 27.01.2016 (annexure-j) have been submitted by m/s.prestige estates project ..... the special court to award compensation in terms of money for wrongful possession of land grabbed and said compensation should not be less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the land grabbed as on the date of the order along with profits accrued from the land payable by the land grabber to 462 the owner ..... she has relied upon the following judgments: (1) e.p.royappa vs state of tamil nadu (air1974sc555 (2) sri ramakrishna dalmiya vs sri justice s.r.tendolkar ..... 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act 8 tada, 1987 s.21 (2) 9 prevention of money s.22, 24, 23 s.3 & 4 laundering 10 unlawful activities s.17, 18, 10 1967 11 negotiable s.118(a), 139 instruments act 564 12 general clauses act s.27 13 wildlife protection act, s.69 1972 14 income tax act s.271 (i) ..... .....
Tag this Judgment!