Court : Karnataka
..... section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. ..... , senior counsel for sri madhukar deshpande, advocate) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare section2126) and217of the companies act, 2013 as unconstitutional; quash the order dated2812.2017 at annexure-a taking cognizance and issuing arrest warrant by the learned special judge against the petitioner in spl.cc.no.12/2018 pending on the file of the lix ..... in the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for ..... of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 borrowing additional finances from banks using the falsely valued brand as collateral security and conversion of part of existing loan from banks into shares in drp. ..... to show the related party transactions in audited financials for the financial years 2008-09 to 2011-12 - liable for prosecution under section 628 read with section 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 read with section as-18 of accounting standards. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. ..... , senior counsel for sri madhukar deshpande, advocate) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare section2126) and217of the companies act, 2013 as unconstitutional; quash the order dated2812.2017 at annexure-a taking cognizance and issuing arrest warrant by the learned special judge against the petitioner in spl.cc.no.12/2018 pending on the file of the lix ..... in the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for ..... of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 borrowing additional finances from banks using the falsely valued brand as collateral security and conversion of part of existing loan from banks into shares in drp. ..... to show the related party transactions in audited financials for the financial years 2008-09 to 2011-12 - liable for prosecution under section 628 read with section 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 read with section as-18 of accounting standards. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. ..... , senior counsel for sri madhukar deshpande, advocate) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare section2126) and217of the companies act, 2013 as unconstitutional; quash the order dated2812.2017 at annexure-a taking cognizance and issuing arrest warrant by the learned special judge against the petitioner in spl.cc.no.12/2018 pending on the file of the lix ..... in the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for ..... of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 borrowing additional finances from banks using the falsely valued brand as collateral security and conversion of part of existing loan from banks into shares in drp. ..... to show the related party transactions in audited financials for the financial years 2008-09 to 2011-12 - liable for prosecution under section 628 read with section 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 read with section as-18 of accounting standards. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. ..... , senior counsel for sri madhukar deshpande, advocate) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare section2126) and217of the companies act, 2013 as unconstitutional; quash the order dated2812.2017 at annexure-a taking cognizance and issuing arrest warrant by the learned special judge against the petitioner in spl.cc.no.12/2018 pending on the file of the lix ..... in the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for ..... of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 borrowing additional finances from banks using the falsely valued brand as collateral security and conversion of part of existing loan from banks into shares in drp. ..... to show the related party transactions in audited financials for the financial years 2008-09 to 2011-12 - liable for prosecution under section 628 read with section 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 read with section as-18 of accounting standards. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. ..... , senior counsel for sri madhukar deshpande, advocate) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare section2126) and217of the companies act, 2013 as unconstitutional; quash the order dated2812.2017 at annexure-a taking cognizance and issuing arrest warrant by the learned special judge against the petitioner in spl.cc.no.12/2018 pending on the file of the lix ..... in the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for ..... of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 borrowing additional finances from banks using the falsely valued brand as collateral security and conversion of part of existing loan from banks into shares in drp. ..... to show the related party transactions in audited financials for the financial years 2008-09 to 2011-12 - liable for prosecution under section 628 read with section 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 read with section as-18 of accounting standards. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... section 216(16) of the act, 2013, being unambiguous in its application, the amended act, 2013, will not be applicable, and consequently, the special court established under the 2013 act lacks jurisdiction. ..... , senior counsel for sri madhukar deshpande, advocate) this writ petition is filed under articles226and227of the constitution of india r/w section482of code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare section2126) and217of the companies act, 2013 as unconstitutional; quash the order dated2812.2017 at annexure-a taking cognizance and issuing arrest warrant by the learned special judge against the petitioner in spl.cc.no.12/2018 pending on the file of the lix ..... in the case of kapur chand pokhraj, the supreme court held that the bombay sales tax act, 1953 (repealing sales act), did not make any change either in the offence or in the procedure prescribed to prosecute for ..... of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 borrowing additional finances from banks using the falsely valued brand as collateral security and conversion of part of existing loan from banks into shares in drp. ..... to show the related party transactions in audited financials for the financial years 2008-09 to 2011-12 - liable for prosecution under section 628 read with section 211(3c) of the companies act, 1956 read with section as-18 of accounting standards. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... kennel club of india a society registered under the tamil nadu society registration act, represented by its secretary having its registered address at no.28/29, aa block, first street, anna nagar, chennai 600 040. ..... filled up as casual vacancies for the remaining period of the term of the board as so reconstituted: provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply in relation to any person who ceases to be member of the board by virtue of the amendment made in sub-section (1) of section 5 by sub-clause (ii) of clause (a) of section 5 of the prevention of cruelty to animals (amendment) act, 1982). ..... same date and that their terms of off ice come to an end on the same date, the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, reconstitute, as soon as may be after the prevention of cruelty to animals (amendment) act, 1982 comes into force, the board. ..... the obliteration will not come in the way of the union of india bringing in an amendment to any of the rules framed under the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960, after following due process of law, as observed in the course of the order ..... with regards, yours sincerely, sd/- (dr.o.p.chaudhary) (emphasis added) 20 the impugned circular has several breeds of dogs that would be the subject matter of ban and local bodies have been directed to issue necessary implementation guidelines with regard to import, breeding, selling the ..... (emphasis added) the representation is submitted by a law firm the legal attorneys and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... the change made in section 28(3) by the amendment act really follows what is stated in paras 42.3 to 45 in associate builders, namely, that the construction of the terms of a contract is primarily for an arbitrator to decide, unless the arbitrator construes the contract in a manner that no fair-minded or reasonable ..... the provision, as amended by the arbitration and conciliation (amendment) act, 2015 reads as follows ..... the curative jurisdiction should not be used to open the floodgates and create a fourth or fifth stage of court intervention in an arbitral award, under this court s review jurisdiction or curative jurisdiction, ..... track recording was done with oms-2000 during these trials and no peak of value 0.15g was recorded upto 120 kmph (results of oms2000are enclosed in annexure xiv) (emphasis supplied) ..... it has been clarified by this court, in a line of precedent, that the jurisdiction under section 37 of the arbitration act is akin to the jurisdiction of the court under section 34 and restricted to the same grounds of challenge as section ..... exercise of power under section 37, which is akin to section 34, this court (under article136) must limit itself to testing whether the court acting under section 37 exceeded its jurisdiction by failing to apply the correct tests to assail the award. ..... that while amel had been running without a glitch since 23 february 2011, the retail activity had not picked pace. ..... of challenge will now fall within the new ground added under section 34(2-a).41. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... the commission of such offence or any illegally acquired property or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of holding any illegally acquired property which is liable for seizure or freezing or forfeiture under chapter va of this act is kept or concealed: (2) any such officer of gazetted rank of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government including the para military forces or the armed ..... has reason to believe from personal knowledge or information given by any person and taken down in writing that any narcotic drug, or psychotropic substance, or controlled substance in respect of which an offence punishable under this act has been committed or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of the commission of such offence or any illegally acquired property or any document or other article which may furnish evidence of holding any illegally ..... this relaxation contemplated by virtue of section 42(2) of the ndps act 1985 was brought about through the amendment act of 2001 to the ndps act of 1985 wherein prior to this position, the section 42(2) mandated the copy of the said writing to be sent to the ..... state of tamil nadu (2021) 4 scc1whereby it has been categorically held that a statement recorded under section 67 of the ndps act 1985 ..... the evidentiary value of confessional statements recorded under section 67 of the ndps act 1985 was dealt with by this court in the case of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... was as regional manager (south) in kodak india private limited and he had joined the appellant as head of sales operations for four southern states (karnataka, tamil nadu, andhra pradesh and kerala) and was also the team leader of a managerial team which comprised an account manager (sales) each for the four states. ..... products, 2002 scc online guj 143; suzuki parasrampuria suitings private limited v official liquidator of mahendra petrochemicals limited (in liquidation), (2018) 10 scc707 muthu karuppan, commissioner of police, chennai 15 v parithi ilamvazhuthi, (2011) 5 scc496 k d sharma v steel authority of india limited, (2008) 12 scc481 tularam manikrao hadge v sudarshan paper converting works, nagpur, 2020 scc online bom 965; bombay mothers and children s society ..... or retrenched in connection with, or as a consequence of, that dispute, or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person (i) who is subject to the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison; or (iii) who is employed mainly in a managerial or administrative capacity; or (iv) ..... the constitution bench further took notice of the subsequent amendment in the definition of workman and held that even the legislature ..... labour, tax, corporate and ..... has been declared per incuriam, it does not have the precedential value. .....
Tag this Judgment!