Court : Karnataka
Reported in : (2008)11VST240(Karn)
P. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 16 of the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the appellant has called in question the correctness of the order dated June 27, 1994, passed by the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Administration), Gulbarga Division, Gulbarga.2. The facts in brief can be stated as hereunder:The appellant (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') is a proprietary concern and is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Act and it is engaged in the activity of extracting oil from rice bran. During the years 1987-88 and 1988-89, the assessee caused entry of rice bran into the Raichur local area from outside. The assessing authority by means of its order dated May 29, 1991, granted exemption from the payment of tax under the Act on the entry of rice bran brought into the local area by the assessee taking the view that the same did not constitute raw material for the purpose of entry 16...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2008KAR257; (2008)13VST377(Karn); 2008(1)KCCR451; 2008(2)AIRKarR8; 2008LabIC1763
V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. These matters are listed before this Court pursuant to the order passed by the Supreme Court on 14.7,2006 in Civil Appeal No. 4476/00 and connected matters. The operative portion of the said order reads as under;-Since relevant data do not appear to have been placed before the High Courts, we permit the parties to place them in the concerned writ petitions within two months, The concerned High Courts shall deal with the basic issue as to whether the impugned levy was compensatory in nature. The High Courts are requested to decide the aforesaid issue within five months from the date of receipt of our order. The Judgment in the respective cases shall be placed on record by the concerned parties within a months from the date of the decision in each case pursuant to our direction.2. Ms. Vani, learned Counsel for the appellant filed a memo requesting this Court to treat the applications I.A.II/06, for production of additional documents, as having been filed in this app...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11/04/2004 IN WP. NOS.11361-372/2011 (T-RES) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO QUASHING OF THE LEVY OF PENALTY AND INTEREST AND ALSO IN RESPECT OF DIRECTION TO THE STATE GOVERNMENT FOR RECOVERY OF THE TAX AMOUNT FROM THE SECOND RESPONDENT - UNION OF INDIA.) N. KUMAR J., 1. All these writ appeals are preferred against the common order passed by the learned single Judge. None of the parties are happy with the order. Therefore, everyone has preferred appeal against the said order to the extent they are aggrieved of such order. Therefore, these appeals are taken up for consideration together and disposed of by this common order. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed to in writ appeal No.3403-3439/2011 arising out of W.P. No.11508/2011 and 12693-12727 of 2011. FACTUAL MATRIX 2. The assessee - M/s. Indus Towers...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.5739/11 and 18322-332/11 C/W 5740-42/11 and 18286-318/11 Dated 16/08/2012.) (Prayer: This Writ Appeal Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No. 16015/11 and 23815-825/11, 25518/11 and 43584-593/11 Dated 16/08/2012.) (Prayer: This Writ Appeal Filed U/S 4 Of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No.16162/11 and 41091-101/11 Dated 16/08/2012.) Diiip B. Bhosale, J. 1. In these writ appeals, a short, yet important question of law, that falls for our consideration is whether the appellants-assessees, who are engaged in growing of tea/coffee plants and so also in manufacturing of tea/coffee as marketable commodity are entitled to take tax credit of inputs such as fertilizers, chemicals, pesticides, agricultural implements etc., used in the process ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the proceedings dated 10.11.2013 vide Annexure-A issued by R-2 and notification dated 23.11.2013 vide Annexure-A1 of the R-2 and etc. This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records and quashing Government notification dated 23.11.2013 vide Annexure-G. These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the notification dated 23.11.2013 passed by the R2 vide Annexure-A and the R2 Board proceedings/meeting dated 10.11.2013 vide Annexure-B fixing the price for sugarcane and hereby seeking direction to direct the R2 to fix the price of the sugarcane afresh considering the recovery of sugar from sugarcane and income from the by products of the sugarcane received by the R3. This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India prayi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: Crl. A. No.835/2014 is filed Under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure by the Advocate for the Appellant/Accused No.1 Praying that this Honble Court may be Pleased to set aside the Judgment and Order of Conviction and Sentence Both Dated: 27.09.2014 Passed by the 36th Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases against Kum. Jayalalitha and Others) at Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.208/2004 Convicting the Appellant/Accused No.1 for the Offence Punishable Under Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and Under Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code read with Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and the Appellant/Accused No.1 is Sentenced to Undergo Simple Imprisonment for a Period of Four Years, and to pay a Fine of Rs.100 Crores. In Default to pay the Fine Amount, she shall Undergo Further Imprisonment for One Year For the Offence Punishable Under Section 13(1)(E) read ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Rathnakala, J. 1. The judgment and decree passed by 6th Additional City Civil Court, City Civil Judge, Bangalore on his file in Arbitration Suit No. 119 of 2006, dated 17-10-2008 is under attack in this appeal. By the impugned judgment, the learned Court dismissed the suit filed by this appellant/plaintiff under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act') came to be dismissed. 2. The plaintiff had filed the said suit to set aside the award passed by the Arbitrator on 5-8-2006. 3. Briefly stated: The appellant s predecessor by name M/s. Fletcher Pioneer (India) Private limited (the previous company since purchased by the appellant, hereinafter for short the appellant') entered into a rock processing/crushing agreement dated 10-4-2002 with Delta Constructions Systems Limited (hereinafter for short the Delta') as per Ex.C.17, dated 10-4-2002 for crushing of feed rock supplied by the appellant into small pieces. As per the agreement, the a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayers: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to declare the notification Ann-A the notification dt.27.8.08, is ultra vires the provision of Article 246, Entry-54 of Seventh Schedule, List I-Union List of Constitution of India, the Karnataka Forest Act 1963 and the provisions of the Forest [Conservation] Act 1980 [Central Act]. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the demand notice dtd.18.9.2013 vide Annex-A and the demand notice dtd.21.9.2013 vide Annex-A1, both issued by the R4, and all further proceedings thereto and etc., This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the notification dt. 16.8.2008 issued by the R1 and published in the Gazette on 27.8.2008 vide Annexure E and the memorandum/common order dt. 30.9.2008 issued by the R4 vide Annexure G and all further proceedings thereto, in so far as the petitioner is ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
-:1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA Writ Petition Nos.2642/2009 (GM-MM-S) c/w 44793/2013, 13595/2008, 13516/2008, 13654/2008, 13803/2008, 14157/2008, 14802/2008, 30927/2008, 30928/2008, 30995/2008, 31128/2008, 31129/2008, 31141/2008, 31142/2008, 31143/2008, 31144/2008, 31145/2008, 31146/2008, 31147/2008, 31148/2008, 31149/2008, 31152/2008, 31181/2008, 31183/2008, 31188/2008, 31189/2008, 31191/2008, 31227/2008, 31228/2008, 31229/2008, 31230/2008, 31234/2008, 31235/2008, 31266/2008, 31327/2008, 31439/2008, 31577/2008 (GM-MM-S), 368/2009 (GM-FOR), -:2. :- 863/2009, 6721/2009, 10712/2009, 16237/2009, 35251/2009 (GM-MM-S), 60230/2009 (GM-FOR), 15782/2010, 15795/2010, 15809/2010, 15825- 15826/2010, 15953/2010, 15954/2010, 15984/2010, 15985/2010, 15990/2010, 15991/2010, 16145/2010, 16144/2010, 16147/2010, 17000/2010, 17001/2010...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL AND THE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.P.No.4470/2015 (GM-RES) C/W W.P.No.56789/2014 (GM-RES), W.P.No.59460/2014 (GM-RES), W.P.No.59587/2014 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.53876-877/2015 (GM-RES), W.P.No.27715-716/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.31838/2016 & 33042/2016(GM-RES), W.P.No.100996/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.101879/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103356/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103391/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103417/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103517-518/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103519/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103520/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103521-522/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.103744/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103796/2016 & 103978/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103797/2016 & 103977/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103873-874/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103875-876/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103877-878/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.Nos.103970-971/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.34184/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.34185/2016 (GM-RES), W.P.No.34186/2016 (GM-RES), W...
Tag this Judgment!