Court : Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Rev. No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 Date of Decision:12. h August, 2014 DELHI HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE ..Petitioner Through : Mr. V. Madhukar, Mr. Paritosh Anil, Mr. Jayendra, Mr. V. Bhatt, Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. appointed as Amicus Curiae VERSUS UOI & ANR. Through: ....Respondents Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State. Mr. Amit Chadha, Adv. for applicant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL GITA MITTAL, J It is highly deplorable and heart-rending to note that many poverty stricken children and girls in the prime of youth are taken to 'flesh market' and forcibly pushed into the 'flesh trade' which is being carried on in utter violation of all cannons of morality, decency and dignity of humankind. There cannot be two opinionsindeed there is nonethat this obnoxious and abominable crime Crl Rev.No.443/2009 & Crl.M.A.No.3071/2010 1 committed with all kinds of unthinkable vulgarity should be eradicated at all levels by dras...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :02. 05.2013 Date of decision:15.05.2013 FAO (OS) No.440/2012 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr.Simran Mehta, Advocate. Versus PUMA SPORTS INDIA PVT.LTD. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and Mr.Sayan Ray, Advocates. AND + FAO (OS) No.52/2013 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr.Simran Mehta, Advocate. Versus PUMA SPORTS INDIA PVT.LTD. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and Mr.Sayan Ray, Advocates. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FAO (OS) Nos.440/2012 and 52/2013 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1) The appellant, Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust, is the owner of premises bearing no.E-10, Block-E, Inner Circle, Connaught Place, New Delhi, which was leased out to the respondent in pursuance to a Lease Deed ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :02. 05.2013 Date of decision:15.05.2013 FAO (OS) No.440/2012 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr.Simran Mehta, Advocate. Versus PUMA SPORTS INDIA PVT.LTD. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and Mr.Sayan Ray, Advocates. AND + FAO (OS) No.52/2013 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr.Simran Mehta, Advocate. Versus PUMA SPORTS INDIA PVT.LTD. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chinmoy Pradip Sharma and Mr.Sayan Ray, Advocates. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FAO (OS) Nos.440/2012 and 52/2013 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1) The appellant, Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust, is the owner of premises bearing no.E-10, Block-E, Inner Circle, Connaught Place, New Delhi, which was leased out to the respondent in pursuance to a Lease Deed ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 10.2018 Pronounced on:07. 01.2019 versus SHOBHA AGGARWAL & ORS. UOI & ANR. + W.P.(C) 516/2010 & CM APPL. 26668/2018 + W.P.(C) 7489/2012 + W.P.(C) 4951/2014 HARSH KUMAR AGARWAL UNION OF INDIA AND ORS MAHENDER YADAV UOI & ANR versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 917/2018 CHAUDHARY KISHAN CHAND & SONS (HUF)........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus + CS(OS) 3518/2012, I.A. 3927/2013 & 15957/2013 RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST RAYMOND LTD & ANR versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants Through:... Petitioner No.1 in person in W.P.(C) 516/2010 with Sh. Pranav Jain, Advocate, for... Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in W.P.(C) 516/2010. Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Rhea. G. Munjal, Ms. Bindita Chaturvedi and Sh. Dikshant Khanna, Advocates, for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4951/2014. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj with Ms. Ananya Mukh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Swatanter Kumar (Chairperson). 1. By this judgment, we shall dispose of the above 62 appeals/applications, as they raise common questions of law, based upon somewhat similar facts before the Tribunal. 2. Thus, in view of above, it is not necessary for us to notice facts, in any greater detail, of all the appeals/applications. Suffice would it be to refer to the facts of the Original Application No. 358(THC)/2013 (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8074/2010) and limited reference of facts in other connected appeals/applications. FACTS: 3. The State of Rajasthan had handed over a piece of land to the Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Limited (for short the œRIICO?) for the purpose of setting up an industrial area. RIICO planned the land into plots for leasing out to industrialists for erection/setting up/establishing industrial units. These industrial premises allotted by RIICO were to be used for manufacture of industrial products by the respective units...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h September, 2017 Decided on:14. h November, 2017 CS(COMM) 447/2017 GMR ENERGY LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Nayar and Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Ms. Malavika Lal, Mr. Karan Luthra and Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocates. versus DOOSAN POWER SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS ..... Defendants Represented by: Mr. Nakul Dewan, Mr. Sumeet Lall, Mr. Sidhant Kapoor, Ms. Neelu Mohan and Mr. Zain Maqbool, Advocates for defendant No.1. Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shally Bhasin, Advocate for defendant Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA I.A. No.7248/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC), 9068/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) and 9069/2017 (under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996) 1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff GMR Energy Limited (in short GMR Energy) against Dossan Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd. (in short Doosan In...
Tag this Judgment!