Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tamil nadu panchayats third amendment act 2005 Page 4 of about 9,103 results (0.247 seconds)

S. Abubakkar Siddiq Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai District an ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... the writ petitioner seeks the eviction of the 6th respondent trust from the tank in question is that under section 14-a(2) of act 26 of 1948, inserted by way of amendment under the tamil nadu act 49 of 1979, any ryotwari patta granted in respect of any private tank or oorani under act 26 of 1948, before the date of publication of the amendment act, shall stand cancelled. ..... already been issued with a patta under the tamil nadu estates (abolition and conversion into ryotwari ) act, 1948 (in short "act 26 of 1948"), by the settlement officer and hence the panchayat also took steps to get the patta cancelled ..... frustrated by their failure in all the attempts that they have made, right from 1926 upto the year 2000, the elected representatives of the panchayat board appear to have set-up a third party to come up with a public interest litigation, purportedly for the removal of the alleged encroachment, on what can be superficially termed as ..... prayer: writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to remove the encroachments of the oorani in pudhuvayal town panchayat survey no.105/1, to an extent of 2 acres and 7 cents and to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to mend the oorani for getting water for the public use, by considering the petitioner's representation ..... the said order, the settlement officer took note of the attempt made by the panchayat board, not once but twice, way back in 1926 and in 1933 to .....

Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Prl. Secretary (P.R. and R.D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)ALT263

..... the 1994 act was amended by the andhra pradesh panchayat raj (third amendment) act, 2000 and provisions relating to elections, including sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) of section 11, were amended. ..... he pointed out that vide notification dated 1-5-2006, the state commission specifically authorized the district panchayat officers to prepare and publish electoral rolls of the gram panchayats in their respective districts with reference to 1 -1 -2005 as the qualifying date and, therefore, the electoral rolls published on 8-5-2006 cannot be declared illegal ..... shri rao claimed that the procedure envisaged under section 11 of the 1994 act and the 2000 rules is already obtaining in the states of assam, tamil nadu, west bengal, goa, madhya pradesh, orissa and rajasthan. ..... . it is also significant to notice that the state commission had initiated the process for revision of the assembly electoral rolls with reference to 1-1-2006 as the qualifying date as early as on 27-9-2005 when press note was issued incorporating a comprehensive time schedule for publication of draft rolls, period for filing claims and objections and disposal thereof, preparation and printing of supplements and additions, deletions ..... the aforementioned press note was followed by letter dated 24-10-2005, which was sent by the secretary of the state commission to the state presidents and general secretaries of all recognized and registered political parties to motivate the public to file necessary claims and objections for .....

S. Kumar Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... a counter affidavit has been filed by the third respondent stating that as per the provisions contemplated in rule 3 of the tamil nadu panchayat building rules, 1997, the owner of the land has to apply for approval of lay out site to the executive authority, who shall get prior concurrence of the director of town and country planning or authorised joint ..... sub registrar : 2007 3 mlj 1025, held that the hon'ble supreme court in the case of basant nahata, referred supra, held that provision section 22a of the registration act, as amended was held to be unconstitutional and ultra vires article 14 and 246 of constitution of india and the executive instructions issued an under the provision in g.o.ms. no. ..... basant nahata : 2005 (4) ctc 606, the hon'ble division bench in the case of captain dr. r. ..... 619/2005, on the file of the third respondent pertains to places allotted for public purpose, which fact was not considered by the first respondent.4. ..... therefore, in my view the first respondent was correct in rejecting the request made by the petitioner in his representation dated 28.02.2005. ..... 619/05 dated 16.06.2005. ..... 28560/07 and this court by order dated 21.09.2007 directed the district collector to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.02.2005. .....

D. Sekaran Vs. the Director of School Education and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)1MLJ585

..... petitioner reiterated the contention raised in the affidavit and argued that the first respondent has failed to see that the petitioner is fully qualified to hold his post in terms of annexure v prescribed under rule 15(6) of the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) rules, 1974, which provides qualification, conditions of service of teachers and other persons.in this case, we are concerned with rule 15(6), which reads as follows:the teachers and other persons employed ..... the third respondent-school is a private school within the meaning of section 2(7) of the tamil nadu recognised private schools (regulation) act, 1973. ..... for admission to the first year of the higher secondary course in schools in tamil nadu:qualification under equivalent for academic purpose toopen school educationsystem of tamil nadu.pass in x standard course under open pass in s.s.l.c. ..... the government accept the recommendation of the director of school education and scert and direct that in addition to the qualification referred to in paragraph 2 above the following qualification under the open school education system of tamil nadu be also considered equivalent to the qualifications specified against it for academic purposes, i.e. ..... in the open school system and he is at present working in the first ward panchayat union school at vatlagundu. ..... any change in the qualification will have to be made by the government by making necessary amendments to the rules. .....

State of Orissa and Others Vs. Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1995SC1868; JT1995(3)SC662; 1995(2)SCALE900; 1995Supp(2)SCC686; [1995]3SCR639

..... or after the commencement of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) amendment act, 1972, (56 of 1972), shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the instrument of lease or in any other law for the time being in force, pay to the state government, every year, dead rent at such rate as may be specified for the time being, in the third schedule, for all the areas included in the instrument of lease.provided that ..... covered with water, but does not include-(a) mineral bearing land as defined in the orissa rural employment, education and production act, 1992; and(b) houses or buildings.from the above, it will be seen that the combined effect of section 3(1) of orissa act 36 of 1992 and the orissa cess act of 1962, as amended by act 10 of 1994, is that only mineral bearing land and coal bearing land will be subject to the levy of tax under ..... -bearing land, the rate as may be prescribed from time to time in respect thereof; (e) in the case of coal-bearing land, the rate as specified in the schedule, and(3) the state government may, by notification, amend the schedule from time to time so as to enhance or reduce the rate of tax specified therein; provided that every such ratification shall, as soon as it is published, be laid before the state legislature for a total ..... state of tamil nadu and by a three judge bench ..... section 115(1) of the madras panchayats act, 1958 levied a local cess at the rate of 45 paise on every rupee of land revenue payable to the government in respect .....

All India Other Backward Community Association (Regn. No. 291/94 Ms) R ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)3MLJ676

..... we are unable to accept the submission of learned counsel for the appellant for the reason that once the notification has been issued under section 4 of the tamil nadu district municipalities act, then that particular local area within the vicinity of the municipality shall form part of the municipality and clause-6 of the notification empowers the state government to pass orders for the transfer ..... srinivas, learned counsel for the second respondent herein submitted that the government order has been issued under the provisions of the tamil nadu district municipalities act, 1920 after hearing objections of the residents and the government has the power to include the area in question within the limits ..... of the governor to include within the municipality any local area in the vicinity of the municipality is derived from section 4 of the tamil nadu district municipalities act, 1920 and the only exception is the cantonment area as the proviso to section 4 provides that no cantonment shall be included within a ..... the madras local boards act, 1920 was amended by the madras village panchayats act, 1950 (act x of 1950). ..... sureshkumar, learned counsel appearing for the third respondent referred to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the third respondent and submitted that in the golden rock colony, the railway department is maintaining the civil amenities such as water supply and drainage, electricity, education, road maintenance, hospital ..... counsel appearing for the third respondent. 9. .....

Nalliaya Gounder Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... . principal secy to the government, rural development & panchayat raj deptt, state of tamil nadu reported in (2011) 2 lw607 the learned judge has clearly brought out the distinction between section 17(1) and section 17(2) of the land acquisition act and observed that urgency clause found under section 17(1) cannot be ..... also the averments of the petitioners in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition as well as the reply affidavit, i am of the considered view that such a notification under section 17(4) of the act was not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case and i am convinced that the petitioners should have been given an opportunity to putforth their objections as against the acquisition sought to be made ..... counsel for the petitioner, mr.m.s.ramesh, learned additional government pleader for respondents 1 and 2 and mr.m.digvijayapandian, learned counsel for the third respondent advanced their arguments in line with the contentions made by the parties in the affidavit filed in support of the writ ..... the attempt by the advocate general to rely upon the state amendment under section 17 for justifying the impugned order is misconceived ..... contended that in view of a resolution dated 16.02.2005 passed by the komarapalayam municipality citing the judgment ..... . by joint secretary, revenue, pondicherry reported in 2005 writ l.r.530, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that facts of the case on hand are comparable to the facts of the said case and ..... 2005 .....

S.S. Bola and Others Vs. B.D. Sardana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC3127; JT1997(6)SC637; 1997(5)SCALE90; (1997)8SCC522; [1997]Supp2SCR507

..... the court was, therefore, firmly of the view that the gujarat panchayats (third amendment) act, 1978 was unconstitutional, as it offended articles 311 and 14 and was arbitrary and ..... the court, however, examined the validity of the amending act and came to the conclusion that before the amending act was passed the employees who had been allocated to the panchayat service had achieved the status of government servants under the provisions of the principal act of 1961 and that status as government servant cannot be extinguished so long as the posts are not abolished and their services were not terminated in accordance with the provisions of ..... lal keshav lal soni33 prior to the amendment act, 1978 by operation of the panchayat act, the ex-member employees were allocated to the panchayat service. ..... rayappa gounder29 a bench of three judges considered the validity and effect of the madras entertainments tax amendment act, (20 of 1966) and declared it invalid insofar as it attempted to validate invalid assessments without removing the basis of ..... it is to navigate around these two obstacles of article 311 and article 14 that the amending act was sought to be made retrospective, to bring about an artificial situation as if the erstwhile municipal employees never became ..... constitution bench had held that the central water board constituted under the inter-state water disputes act, 1956 issued interim awards directing karnataka state to release the water to tamil nadu, the lower riparian state. .....

Nimmaka Jaya Raj Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... this writ petition filed as public interest litigation, the petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus declaring sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 143 of the andhra pradesh panchayat raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the act) as illegal and unconstitutional for being in violation of the constitution (seventy-third amendment) act, 1992 with particular reference to articles 243e and 243k of the constitution of india, and for a direction to the respondents to conduct elections to the gram panchayats. 3. ..... iv) all the writ petitions challenging the validity of amending acts, providing for appointment of special officers for local bodies shall stand ..... it is the case of the state that the said ordinance was promulgated only to fill the vacuum in extraneous circumstances as the act did not provide for the said contingency and all necessary steps had been taken for conducting elections to the panchayat raj institutions within time, but in view of the interim stay granted by this court, further steps could not be taken for holding ..... after the 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments, the government of andhra pradesh brought in the andhra pradesh panchayat raj act, 1994 in accord with the objects of these provisions and reserved certain seats to backward classes to an extent of 34%, and this is being continued from ..... he submitted that in the states of tamil nadu and karnataka, 68% and 67% reservation is provided to backward classes basing on their proportionate representation in the .....

Nimmaka Jaya Raj Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Repres

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... this writ petition filed as public interest litigation, the petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus declaring sub-sections (3) and (4) of section 143 of the andhra pradesh panchayat raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') as illegal and unconstitutional for being in violation of the constitution (seventy-third amendment) act, 1992 with particular reference to articles 243e and 243k of the constitution of india, and for a direction to the respondents to conduct elections to the gram panchayats.3. ..... iv) all the writ petitions challenging the validity of amending acts, providing for appointment of special officers for local bodies shall stand ..... it is the case of the state that the said ordinance was promulgated only to fill the vacuum in extraneous circumstances as the act did not provide for the said contingency and all necessary steps had been taken for conducting elections to the panchayat raj institutions within time, but in view of the interim stay granted by this court, further steps could not be taken for holding ..... after the 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments, the government of andhra pradesh brought in the andhra pradesh panchayat raj act, 1994 in accord with the objects of these provisions and reserved certain seats to backward classes to an extent of 34%, and this is being continued from ..... he submitted that in the states of tamil nadu and karnataka, 68% and 67% reservation is provided to backward classes basing on their proportionate representation in the .....