Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tamil nadu nonresident tamils welfare act 2011 Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 157 results (0.161 seconds)

State of T.Nadu and ors. Vs. K Shyam Sunder and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... ) no.6143/2011 whereby the high court has struck down section 3 of the tamil nadu uniform system of school education (amendment) act, 2011 (hereinafter called the amendment act 2011) and issued directions to the state authorities to implement the provisions of the tamil nadu uniform system of school education act, 2010 (hereinafter called the act 2010), i.e. ..... . further the prayer for an issuance of writ of declaration declaring that the decision of the cabinet dated 22.5.2011 by the government of tamil nadu to withhold the implementation of the tamil nadu uniform system of school education act, 2010 for the academic year 2011-12 as published vide news release no ..... . the course adopted by modern legislatures in dealing with welfare scheme has uniformly conformed to the same pattern ..... . the legislature evolves a scheme of socio-economic welfare, makes elaborate provisions in respect of it and leaves it to the government concerned to decide when, how and in what manner the scheme should be introduced ..... . the government has a mandate to ensure the quality of education and welfare of the students ..... elders in general, and parents and teachers in particular, owe a responsibility for taking care of the well-being and welfare of the children. ..... . in cases of bidhannagar (salt lake) welfare assn. v ..... , air 1985 sc 551; welfare assocn. a.r.p. .....

New Horizon Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Pondicherry.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2013SC584; 2012(10)SCC575; AIR2012SCW5164

..... bench of the bombay high court came to be considered subsequently on 29th september, 2011, when the constitutional validity of the maharashtra act was upheld with the rider that if any party wished to submit that it was not covered by the maharashtra act or the tamil nadu act, it would be open to them to take appropriate proceedings before the forum concerned ..... jurisdiction of the state government, with reference to various entries in the seventh schedule to the constitution, provisions of the companies act, reserve bank of india act and the maharashtra act and after examining the challenge thrown to the vires of the act, came to the conclusion that the tamil nadu act did not suffer from any legislative incompetency, nor was it arbitrary, unreasonable, or violative of the principles of natural justice. ..... learned judge of the madras high court, who by his order dated 12th july, 2005, in pnl investors welfare association versus union of india, with reference to the sarfaesi act, the sick industrial companies (special provision) act, 1958, act 1 of 2005 and the provisions of the industrial disputes act, 1947, and in particular, section 25ff thereof, disposed of the writ petitions upon holding that the members ..... welfare association, the high court directed the association to work out their remittance under the provisions of the reserve bank of india act (rbi act) as also act ..... pradesa sarkarai aalai thozhilalar sangam; indian bank and the ariyur sugar mills staff welfare union being w.p. .....

Kumari Ranjana Mishra and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... carried out pursuant to the orders of the state government in the department of youth affairs, games and culture, and the inspection committee comprising the director-cum- deputy secretary, student and youth welfare, deputy director, youth welfare-bihar and principal, government- cum-teaching college, patna, submitted a report dated 04.12.1987 stating that the college had a building over 10 acres 30 decimals of land, seven lecturers, two ..... this court having found that the aforesaid college was recognized by the state government prior to the date when the ncte act came into force and the ncte came into existence, directed that the students of the college would be permitted to appear in the examination for the courses ..... tamil nadu ..... course and that the regional committee of ncte was vested with the power to grant recognition only after the ncte act came into force on 01.07.1995 and, therefore, the bihar school examination board should be directed to allow the ..... in that case, after the appointed date (17.08.1995) when the ncte had been established under the ncte act, the state government passed an order dated 16.03.2007 granting recognition to the teachers' training college at nirmali, district supaul (bihar) for 1987-1989 onwards and this court held ..... recognition of the college in which the appellants had studied was in fact withdrawn by the state government in 2004, and after the ncte act came into force, the college had not been granted recognition by the regional committee of the ncte. .....

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... enacted for the purpose of acquisition of land needed for public purposes for companies and for determining the amount of compensation to be made on account of such acquisition, which is substantially and materially different from the impugned act whose dominant purpose is to preserve and protect estategoverned by art.31a(a) read with art.31a(2)(a)(iii) of the constitution. 68. we are, therefore, of the considered view that no assent of the president was required under ..... it was held that the court cannot substitute its own opinion for that of the legislature or its delegate as to what principle or policy would best serve the objects and purpose of the act or sit in judgment over the wisdom and effectiveness or otherwise of the policy laid down by the regulation making body and declare a regulation to be ultra vires merely on the ground that, in the opinion of the court, ..... . state of tamil nadu & another (1974) 4 scr 3; maneka gandhi ..... article 31a was inserted by the 1st amendment act, 1951 to protect the abolition of jamindari abolition laws and also the other types of social, welfare and regulatory legislations effecting private property ..... we have now, vide our order dated 24.02.2011, directed the state government to place the notification before both the houses of the state legislature following the judgment in quarry owners' case (supra ..... senior counsel submitted that in any view of the matter, as per the order of this court dated 24.2.2011 the state govt. ..... (2011) 3 scc 139. .....

A.P.Dairy Dev.Corp.Federation Vs. B.Narasimha Reddy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, it may be necessary to make a reference to some of the relevant findings recorded by the high court : (i) the ordinance/act suffers from vice of hostile discrimination against dairy farms and milk producers without scientific or rational basis for such distinction-merely because the national dairy development board distinctly deals with dairy activities, ..... (supra), this court while dealing with the issue held as under: the statement of objects and reasons appended to the bill is not admissible as an aid to the construction of the act to be passed, but it can be used for limited purpose for ascertaining the conditions which prevailed at that time which necessitated the making of the law, and the extent and urgency of the ..... , air 1962 sc 263, while dealing with a similar issue held as under: an application for the recognition of the association for the purpose of functioning under the enactment is a voluntary act on the part of the association and if the statute imposes conditions subject to which alone recognition could be accorded or continued it is a little difficult to see how the freedom to form the association is affected ..... 2337; and state of tamil nadu & ors. ..... the government has inherent power to promote the general welfare of the people and in order to achieve the said goal, the state is free to exercise its sovereign powers of legislation to regulate the conduct of its citizens to the extent, that ..... (2011) ..... (2011 .....

Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... declare the twenty one islands of the gulf of munnar as a marine national park, but no notification has yet been issued by the government of tamil nadu under section 35(4) of the aforesaid act declaring the twenty one islands of the gulf of munnar as anational park.he explained that prior to the environment (protection) act, 1986 and the environment (protection) rules, 1986, some environmental guidelines had been issued by the ministry of environment and forests, department of environment, ..... he submitted that the appellants have been able to set up the plant at tuticorin in tamil nadu by somehow obtaining environmental clearance from the ministry of environment and forests, government of india, without a public hearing and the consents under the water act and the air act from the tnpcb and the high court rightly allowed the writ petitions and directed closure of the plant of the appellants.13. mr. ..... he referred to the reports of neeri of1998, 1999, 2003 and 2005 submitted to the high court and the report of neeri of 2011 and also the joint inspection report of tnpcb and cpcb of september 2012 submitted to this court, to show that the finding of the high court that the plant of the appellants had caused severe pollution ..... has already held that a right to clean environment is part of the right to life guaranteed under article 21 of the constitution and has explained the precautionary principle and the principle of sustainable development in vellore citizens welfare forum v. .....

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... water level or the full reservoir level; (c) mullaperiyar dam is considered by kerala legislature to be endangered and by virtue of section 62(a), it takes away the right of tamil nadu to increase, expand the frl or in any manner increase the water level as set out in the second schedule except in accordance with the provisions of the act; (d) under section 62a(4), tamil nadu as custodian has to submit an application to the dam safety authority for its prior consent for the increase in the water ..... . while explaining that this power is known as the police power , it is an exercise of the sovereign right of the government to protect the lives, health, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the people, and is paramount to any right under the contracts between the individuals ..... ec. chapter iv contains (i) report of visit of the ec to mullaperiyar dam site/areas during 19- 22.12.2010; (ii) resolutions of the ec dated 21.12.2010, 7.1.2011 and 5.12.2011; and (iii) report of visit by two technical members (dr. ..... court. the ec in its proceedings dated 17.2.2011 formed a coordination committee which comprised the representatives of both the ..... kerala. kerala s grievance is that the ec on 5.12.2011 declined to disclose and supply the copies of results and its reports without dealing with the question of ..... ors.; [(2011) 13 scc344 ..... its. in this regard, kerala referred to the application made before ec on 21.11. ..... d.k. mehta) during 22-26.12. .....

C.s. Gopalakrishnan Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... entry 42 in list iii of the seventh schedule to the constitution of india, it enacted the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 ; the tamil nadu acquisition of land for industrial purposes act, 1997 ; and the tamil nadu highways act, 2001 . ..... high court noted that the validity of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978, was upheld by the supreme court in state of tamil nadu and others vs. ..... applied by this court in ananthi ammal (supra), while upholding the validity of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978.36. in p. ..... it is further pointed out that the procedure prescribed in section 28 of the new la act for determining the amount of compensation is not followed by the state of tamil nadu under the highways act and more particularly, the power given to the collector under section 28(7) of the new la act to take into consideration any other ground which may be in the interest of equity, justice ..... 26028 and 26234 of 2013 were filed assailing the validity of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for industrial purposes act, 1997 (for brevity, the industrial purposes act ), on the ground that it was ultra vires the constitution of india and seeking a consequential direction to the authorities to drop the ..... the government of tamil nadu had issued go.ms.no.200, highways and minor ports department, dated 07.12.2011, proposing to acquire land for construction of a flyover/road over bridge to replace .....

Animal Welfare Board of India Vs. A. Nagaraja and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... that, by no stretch of imagination, it can be gainsaid that jallikattu or bullock-cart race conducted, as such, has any historical, cultural or religious significance, either in the state of tamil nadu or in the state of maharashtra and, even assuming so, the welfare legislation like pca act would supersede the same, being a parliamentary legislation. ..... tamil nadu and maharashtra, with particular reference to the provisions of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 (for short the pca act ), the tamil nadu regulation of jallikattu act, 2009 (for short tnrj act ) and the notification dated 11.7.2011 issued by the central government under section 22(ii) of the pca act ..... is right in its stand that jallikattu, bullock-cart race and such events per se violate sections 3, 11(1)(a) and 11(1)(m)(ii) of pca act and hence we uphold the notification dated 11.7.2011 issued by the central government, consequently, bulls cannot be used as performing animals, either for the jallikattu events or bullock- cart races in the state of tamil nadu, maharashtra or elsewhere in the country. ..... of the event, and with a view to ensure that no unnecessary pain or suffering is caused to the animals, participants as well as spectators, the government proposes to exempt bulls participating in jallikattu in the state of tamil nadu from the purview of the notification dated 11.07.2011, subject to the guidelines, copy of which has been provided along with the affidavit filed by the deputy secretary, moef.9. .....

The Animal Welfare Board Of India Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... prevention of the prevention of cruelty to animals cruelty to animals cruelty to animals cruelty to animals act, 1960 (tamil nadu (karnataka second (maharashtra ( principal act ) amendment) act, amendment) act, amendment) act, 2017 2017 2017 scope an act to prevent the an act to amend the an act further to an act to amend the infliction of prevention of cruelty amend the prevention of cruelty unnecessary pain or to animals act, 1960 prevention of cruelty to animals act, suffering on animals so as to preserve the to animals act, 1960 1960, in its and for that purpose cultural heritage of in its application ..... to application to the to amend the law the state of tamil the state of state of relating to the nadu ..... the authorities cited on this point are state of tamil nadu -vs- state of kerala (supra), chief secretary to the government, chennai, tamil nadu and others -vs- animal welfare board and another [(2017) 2 scc29144]. ..... and another -vs- state of karnataka [(2011) 9 scc1.20. .....