Statement Of Use - Judgment Search Results
“statement of Complainant Was Recorded on 6.7.2008 Whereas Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
impugned order (Annexure P3), which, in substance, is as under:- “Statement of complainant was recorded on 6.7.2008, whereas challan was put in … was only to cause injuries to the complainant. Even wording used by accused Jangir Singh, does not show that the accused
The Statements of Eight Persons Have Been Recorded in Favour of Vs. Fi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-15-2014
of this document Chandigarh CWP No.23658 of 2012 2 the statements of eight persons have been recorded in favour of respondent
“written Statement Is Not Filed by the Defendants. Vs. Ajay Sharma
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-04-2014
the petitioners for condoning the delay in filing the written statement. As a matter of fact, on 07.6.2012, defence of the
Chatur Bhuj Pandey @ Pappu Pandey Vs. Respective Statements with Regar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The said Court also
State of Orissa and Others Vs. Commissioner of Land Records and Statem ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-27-1998
Reported in: AIR1998SC3067; JT1998(5)SC662; 1998(4)SCALE682; (1998)7SCC162; [1998]Supp1SCR130
M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. The main point that arises for consideration in these appeals is whether the delegate of the...
High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. State of Haryana and ors.] on ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-21-2013
& Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.]., on the statement made by the Advocate General, Haryana that the Government shall … existed prior to Section 4, is inhabited and is being used by the owner for his own residential purposes. b) Any
“it Is Correct That Neither the Statements of the Parties nor Vs. Hi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-09-2013
file, which has been traced, clearly depicts that neither the statement of the parties not the order dated 27.1.2007 bears the signature
“2. on the Statement Ex.P1 of Complainant Vishal Son of Vs. Vishal . ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-14-2013
Dahiya (PW-11).His MLR has been placed on record as Ex.P23. Statement of the applicant Vishal was recorded by ASI Dharam Pal (PW-
“13. from the Perusal of the Statements of All the Aforesaid Vs. Seh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-14-2013
a doubt over the prosecution version.” It is true that statement of the prosecutrix alone is sufficient to convict an accused. However,
“The Enquiry Officer Recorded the Statements of 10 Prosecution Witne ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-02-2013
support the prosecution case. Both the witnesses resiled from their statements made by them to the police during the couRs.of the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »