Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state open university act 1992 section 14 the finance officer Page 6 of about 29,895 results (0.326 seconds)

Gautam Morarka (Dr.) and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2742

..... state of rajasthan and ors. decided on 15.5.2007 and dbsaw no. 310/2004 : (rlw 2005(1) raj. 1043) dr. deepak goyal v. university of rajasthan and ors. decided on 28.2.2005.9. the second preliminary objection raised by counsel for the respondents is that the present cases relate to academic matter for which the health university under the rajasthan health university act ..... -service candidates have not been held to belong to any reserved category and the same has been held to be source recruitment in between open market and in-service candidates.32. mr. s.p. sharma in view of the said judgment as well as amended ordinance 278-e and g ..... service, only 6 have qualified and now the remaining seats will be transferred to the open category, although on dispensing with negative marking, all the seats will be filled at minimum qualifying marks of 50%. therefore, the state government has acted arbitrarily as well as discriminatorily amongst similarly situate persons and in giving benefit of two .....

S. Deepika Bhat and Others Vs. Union of India, Represented by Departme ...

Court : Karnataka

..... graduation through open universities system directly without having any basic qualification for prosecuting such studies are not eligible for admission in law courses. you are further informed not to admit any candidate to the ll.b. course having any degree contrary to university grants commission act and regulations and also bar council of india , rules of legal education - 2008. " this, it is stated, is issued ..... to equalize educational opportunities. the system is rigid inter alia in respect of attendance in classrooms. combinations of subjects are also inflexible. 41. was the alternative system envisaged under the open university act in substitution of the formal system, is the question. in our opinion, in the matter of ensuring the standard of education, it is not. the distinction between a formal system .....

Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore and Another Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ446

..... ex facie and apparently appeared to be in contravention of the mandate of section 10a of the dentists act. 12. section 53 of the karnataka state universities act and section 5 of the act presupposes the existence of a legally established and constituted college requiring affiliation and privileges. no institution can seek ..... as warranted under the circumstances of the case.8. before the enforcement of the act, the affiliation of the colleges were governed by the karnataka state universities act, 1976. the act was necessitated to establish and incorporate a university for the purpose of ensuring proper and systematic instruction, teaching, training and research ..... recognition by permitting to establish and opening an educational institution to start a college in particular course, by the state government or central government, is distinct and independent of the power to grant affiliation by exercise of statutory power under the relevant universities act and affiliation mainly meant to prepare .....

Dr. Rajendra B. Lal Son of Late Behari Lal, Vice-chancellor, Allahabad ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005CriLJ250

..... in universities. the preamble of the ugc act says an act to make provision for the coordination and determination of standards in universities and for that. purpose to establish a university grants commission. section 2(f) of this act defines a university and it means a university established or incorporated by or under a central act, a provincial act or a state act, and ..... (annexure ca-1) issued by the u.g.c. regarding the guidelines to the deemed university. the relevant guideline is extracted hereinunder:1) to 3)... 4) the ugc guidelines (2000) (para 115) permits the deemed to be university to open centre(s) in its own area of in places other than its head quarter subject to: ..... i) prior approval of ugc and concerned state government. ii) proposal for starting various academic courses shall have the approval of the ugc. .....

Habib Educational and Welfare Society's M.S. College of Law and Others ...

Court : Mumbai

..... respectfully say that under section 82 (5) of the maharashtra universities act, 1994, the state government has absolute discretion to grant or reject permission to open a new college or institution, taking into account (i) the state government's budgetary resources (ii) the suitability of the managements seeking permission to open new institutions and (iii) the state level priorities with regard to location of the institutions of ..... law for the time being in force, on and from the date of commencement of the maharashtra universities (second amendment) act, 2013, - (a) no management shall establish or open a new college or an institution of higher learning in the state, except with the prior permission of the state government; (b) no management shall start a new course of study, subject, faculty or additional division .....

Mohd. Ishaq Vs. Osmania University, Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1990)IILLJ540AP

..... . the syndicate has power to appoint teachers on the recommendation of the selection committee constituted under section 39 of the osmania university act. having been so appointed, the petitioner cannot contend that he was appointed on regular basis. it is stated that the selection committee after taking into consideration the entire bio-data, qualifications, experience and the performance of the candidate at the ..... holding, was readvertised he applied for the same without protest. this clearly suggests that the petitioner knew that he was appointed on ad hoc basis only and it is not open to him to challenge the appointment orders at this stage. if highly meritorious candidates are available, the petitioner cannot claim that he alone should be selected having regard to the .....

Sarabheshwara Vidya Peetha Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR3182; 1988(3)KarLJ415

..... of this petitioner is that the. impugned order rejecting its application is. also opposed to the relevant provisions of section 53 of the karnataka state universities act, 1976 (in short 'the act') since a duty is cast upon the state government to grant the permission sought for once it is found that the petitioner has complied with alt the requirements of the aforesaid provisions of ..... is open to the state government to formulate a policy by which it can negative the rights of the petitioners both under the constitutional provisions as also the statutory provisions under the act. this question takes me to the decisions of the supreme court on which the learned counsel for the university has relied.20. in the case of k. rajendran and ors. v. state .....

Jitendra Narayan Thakur Vs. Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit Univers ...

Court : Patna

..... the above subject and to say that the chancellor on the recommendation of the state government in the education department has been to approve the following amendment to the statute under section 5(2) of the inter university board act, 1981 for implementation in your university.1. for article 1(b) substitute the following - (b) that, ..... he possesses at least a second class master degree in the subject2. in article 1(c) of the statute after the word contract authority and the following-or the proposal for sanction of the post has been submitted by the university/college to the state ..... paid within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.11. if there is paucity of fund, the university will requisition from the state which, in its turn, will release the fund for compliance of the court's order within one month from the date of such requisition. .....

Yogendra Singh Rawat and ors. Vs. Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal Univ ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1998(1)SC555; 1998(1)SCALE468; (1998)3SCC704; [1998]1SCR685; 1998(1)LC408(SC); (1998)2UPLBEC1004

..... the hemwati nandan bahuguna garhwal university (for short 'the university') in terms of the uttar pradesh state university (second amendment) ordinance (no. 44 of 1991) which was latter passed as act no. 1 of 1992 by the u.p. legislature called the u.p. state universities (amendment) act, 1992 (for short, the 'amending act') . the amending act amended the u.p. state universities act, 1973 (for short, the 'principal act'). a division bench of ..... force on november 22, 1991. sections 2 and 3 of this act amending the principal act, that is the university act, are as follows:'2. in section 13 of the uttar pradesh state university act, 1973, as amended and re-enacted by the uttar pradesh university (re-enactment and amendment) act, 1974 hereinafter referred to as the principal act:-(a) in sub-section (6), after the words 'where any matter .....

B.N. Ahuja Vs. G.S. Pathak and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi438

..... was treated as filed.(21) the past practice referred to by the registrar, in our opinion, was far from desirable. the relevant provisions of the delhi university act and the statutes have made the office of the chancellor to be elective. there was in this respect a departure from the earlier position when the governor-general ..... have gone to respondent no. 1 and obtained his consent. the election to the office of the chancellor, it is further stated, is governed by the rules for elections to the various authorities of the university (hereinafter referred to as the rules).(11) the petition has been resisted by the respondents. the affidavits of shri l. n ..... rules relied upon by the petitioner. shri welingkar adds that no rules and procedure have been prescribed for holding the said election. the scrutiny officer, it is stated, held a preliminary investigation to see that the nomination papers were duly signed and had been received within time. he had no authority to reject the nomination paper .....