Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state of mizoram act 1986 part ii establishment of the state of mizoram Sorted by: recent Page 7 of about 269 results (0.092 seconds)

Apr 20 2012 (HC)

A.Kasinathan Vs. the Branch Manager.

Court : Chennai

..... no inherent right to educational loan:- from the scheme of article 21a of the constitution, it is the primary obligation of the state to provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of 6-14 years and in the recent judgment dated 12.4.2012, the supreme court upheld the constitutional validity of right of children to free and compulsory education under right to education act, 2009 which provides for free and compulsory education to children between age of 6 and 14 years and mandates government/aided/non-minority and ..... employ their funds profitably so as to earn sufficient income out of which the banker is to pay interest to the depositors, salaries to the staff and to meet various other establishment expenses and distribute dividends to the shareholders. ..... for getting jobs/employment in different parts of the country/abroad, one of the criteria is academic performance and there is nothing wrong for the banks in stipulating 60% marks for the students who secured admission under management ..... , learned counsel for writ petitioner contended that it is the public duty on the part of nationalised banks to perform its public duties of social objectives and while so prescribing marks stipulating 60% marks to the students, who secured admission, under management quota is discriminatory ..... rightly the reserve bank of india has included educational loans as a part of priority sector lending of ..... further contended that educational loan is a part of inherent right to education. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2012 (HC)

The State of Karnataka, Rep. by Its Chief Secretary Vs. A.R. Infant I. ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the second person in the list has intimated the state of karnataka his unwillingness to come back to the state as he was working in the state of mizoram and therefore, the state has excluded his name from consideration but, in the empanelled list though the committee consists of the chief secretary of the karnataka as well as the dgp and ig of karnataka who had knowledge of these things still included his name in the empanelled list. ..... but from the material on record, we can have a glimpse of what the report is, what are its findings and what are the objections of the state and the third respondent to the said report, how the nhrc has treated the objections as well as the report and the relief the nhrc has given to the victims of the atrocities committed by the stf. ..... one of the controversies is the very act on the part of the state calling for empanelment on the assumption that the then incumbent would relinquish his office on 30.11.2011 itself is not correct. ..... no firm foundation is laid in the pleadings to establish the ground of malafides. ..... dass (supra) [1986 (supp) scc 617] wherein at paragraph 28 it was held as follows: it is true that where merit is that sole basis of promotion, the power of selection becomes wide and liable to be abused with less difficulty. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2012 (SC)

Adarsh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and ors. Vs. Subhash Rahangdale and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (xi) while granting affiliation, the examining body shall be free to demand rigorous compliance of the conditions contained in the statute like the university act or the state education board act under which it was established or the guidelines / norms which may have been laid down by the concerned examining body. ..... section 3 provides for establishment of the council which comprises of a chairperson, a vice-chairperson, a member-secretary, various functionaries of the government, thirteen persons possessing experience and knowledge in the field of education or teaching, nine members representing the states and the union territories administration, three members of parliament, three members to be appointed from amongst teachers of primary and secondary education and teachers of recognised institutions. ..... we may further state here that we would have imposed exemplary costs as it was within the special knowledge of the petitioners that they could not have got the relief without further action being taken by the apex body of the ncte and without the affiliation, yet we restrain from, doing so for the present as we treat this spate of litigations as a manifestation of unwarranted and uncalled for anxiety on the part of the persons who are in the management of the said institutions. ..... state of andhra pradesh, (1986) supp. ..... state of andhra pradesh 1986 (supp. ..... government of andhra pradesh (1986) 2 scc 667. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2011 (HC)

The Chairman Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... (8) how the establishment of the college would resolve the problem of deficiencies of qualified medical personnel in the state and improve the availability of such medical manpower in the state ..... the said form is a part of the regulations which are required to be considered in the light of the parliamentary ..... .- during the period when the council stands superseded, - a)the provisions of this act shall be construed as if for the word council, the words board of governors were substituted; (b)the board of governors shall- (i)exercise the powers and discharge the functions of the council under this act and for this purpose, the provisions of this act shall have effect subject to the modification that references therein to the council shall be construed as references to the board of governors; (ii)grant independently permission for establishment of new medical colleges or opening a new or higher course ..... of study or training or increase in admission capacity in any course of study or training referred to in section 10a or giving the person or college .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2011 (SC)

M.S.K.Mandal Sanchalt Mskm B.Ed College. Vs. National Council for Teac ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2012(2)SCC16; 2012(2)SCJ193; 2012(3)MLJ134; 2012(1)CWC841; 2012(2)LW769

..... the institution established by the appellant is not equipped with the infrastructure required under the ncte act and the regulations ..... the present is one such case where the institution established by the appellant has been inspected more than once and several deficiencies that seriously affect its capacity to impart quality education and training to future teachers specifically pointed ..... shortly after the grant of the said recognition, the ncte issued a notice dated 27th july, 2008 to the appellant to show cause why the recognition should not be withdrawn in terms of section 17 of the act in view of the deficiencies pointed out in the notice like inadequacy of built-up area available to the institution, the land underlying the structure not being in the name of the appellant-trust and the college being run in a building that is used by two other institutions. ..... this court observed that the field of education had become a fertile, perennial and profitable business with the least capital outlay in some states and that societies and individuals were establishing such institutions without complying with the statutory requirements. ..... government of a.p (1986) 2 scc 667, a similar request made on behalf of the institution and the students for permitting them to appear at the examination even though affiliation had not been granted, was rejected by this ..... the unfortunate part is that despite repeated pronouncements of this court over the past two decades deprecating the setting up of such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2011 (HC)

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... the gujarat industrial development act operates in a totally different sphere from parts ix and ixa of the constitution as well as the gujarat panchayats act, 1961 and the gujarat municipalities act, 1962 - the latter being provisions dealing with local self government while the former being an act for industrial development, and orderly establishment and organisation of industries in a state. ..... in pista devi case [ 1986 (4) scc 251 ] this court while considering the legality of the exercise of the power under section 17(4) exercised by the state government dispensing with the inquiry under section 5-a for acquiring housing accommodation for planned development of meerut, had held that providing housing accommodation is national urgency of which court should take judicial notice. ..... in the said case, notification under section 4 was issued on 22.12.1984, declaration under section 6 was issued on 21.2.1986 and award was passed on 16.11.1987. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2011 (HC)

Nalanda Education Trust Vs. National Council for Teacher Education (We ...

Court : Gujarat

..... . stateof bihar this court, when the ill-equipped and mismanagedschools were taken over by an act whose validity was challenged onthe anvil of article 30 of the constitution, held that even theminority institutions are subject to statutory regulations andestablishment and maintenance of such an educational institutionshould be in conformity with the statute and the state is entitled toregulate the establishment of the educational institutions and theadmission of the students in those educational institutions ..... . in thesaid case in paragraph 6, while referring to the case of n.m.nageshwaramma versus state of andhra pradesh and another,reported in 1986 (supp) scc 166, has observed that if thegovernment is directed to permit the students admitted in thoseinstitutions to appear in the examinations, the honourable courtwould practically be encouraging and condoning the establishment ofunauthorized institutions and has observed that it is not appropriatethat the jurisdiction of the honourable court under article 32 orarticle 226 of the constitution of india should be frittered away forsuch a purpose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2011 (HC)

SHRi YOGANANDA EDUCATiON and CHARiTABLE TRUST SANCHALiT Vs. NATiONAL C ...

Court : Gujarat

..... state of bihar3this court, when the ill-equipped and mismanaged schools wer takenover by an act whose validity was challenged on the anvil of article30 of the constitution, held that even the minority institutions aresubject to statutory regulations and establishment and maintenance ofsuch an educational institution should be in conformity with thestatute and the state is entitled to regulate the establishment ofthe educational institutions and the admission of the students inthose ..... .viii)mergerof shri uma education trust with shri jalaram education trust andshri morvi sarvajanik kelvani mandal was never permitted by thewrc.ix) thecollege/trust did not possess land as per clause 8(5) of the ncteregulations 2005.2.11)at that stage, the petitioner vehemently contended that the groundson which the recognition of the petitioner-institute came to bewithdrawn were never a part of the show-cause notice dated 28.04.2011and the order of withdrawal of recognition traversed beyond theshow-cause notice. ..... state of andhra pradesh andanother, reported in 1986 (supp) scc 166, has observed that if thegovernment is directed to permit the students admitted in thoseinstitutions to appear in the examinations, the hon'ble court wouldpractically be encouraging and condoning the establishment ofunauthorized institutions and has observed that it is not appropriatethat the jurisdiction of the hon'ble court under article 32 orarticle 226 of the constitution of india should be frittered away forsuch .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2011 (HC)

UMA EDUCATiON TRUST SANCHALiT B.ED. COLLEGE Vs. NATiONAL COUNCiL FOR T ...

Court : Gujarat

..... state of bihar3this court, when the ill-equipped and mismanaged schools wer takenover by an act whose validity was challenged on the anvil of article30 of the constitution, held that even the minority institutions aresubject to statutory regulations and establishment and maintenance ofsuch an educational institution should be in conformity with thestatute and the state is entitled to regulate the establishment ofthe educational institutions and the admission of the students inthose ..... other societies to be run in the same premises.meger of shri uma education trust with shri jalaram education trust and shri morvi sarvajanik kelavni mandal was never permitted by the wrc.copy of building approved by the rajkot urban development authority not submitted.2.11)at that stage, the petitioner vehemently contended that the groundson which the recognition of the petitioner-institute came to bewithdrawn were never a part of the show-cause notice dated 30.04.2011and the order of withdrawal of recognition traversed ..... state of andhra pradesh andanother, reported in 1986 (supp) scc 166, has observed that if thegovernment is directed to permit the students admitted in thoseinstitutions to appear in the examinations, the hon'ble court wouldpractically be encouraging and condoning the establishment ofunauthorized institutions and has observed that it is not appropriatethat the jurisdiction of the hon'ble court under article 32 orarticle 226 of the constitution of india should be frittered away .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2011 (HC)

SHRi MORVi SARVAJANiK KELAVNi MANDAL SANCHALiT MSKM B ED Vs. NATiONAL ...

Court : Gujarat

..... state of bihar3this court, when the ill-equipped and mismanaged schools wer takenover by an act whose validity was challenged on the anvil of article30 of the constitution, held that even the minority institutions aresubject to statutoryregulations and establishment and maintenance of such an educationalinstitution should be in conformity with the statute and the state isentitled to regulate the establishment of the educationalinstitutions and the admission of the students in those educationalinstitutions. ..... state of andhra pradesh andanother, reported in 1986 (supp) scc 166, has observed that if thegovernment is directed to permit the students admitted in thoseinstitutions to appear in the examinations, the hon'ble court wouldpractically be encouraging and condoning the establishment ofunauthorized institutions and has observed that it is not appropriatethat the jurisdiction of the hon'ble court under article 32 orarticle 226 of the constitution of india should be frittered away forsuch a purpose. ..... firstly, wehave noticed that there are many disputed questions of fact.secondly, we cannot ignore the report of the second inspecting team,which visited the premises on 6th september 2011, wherethe members of the team have reported number of deficiencies, whichwe have noticed and the same is incorporated in the earlier part ofthe judgment. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //