Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h October, 2013 % + WP (C) No.4770/2012 & CM Nos. 9869/2012 (for stay), 11129/2012 (for impleadment), 16545/2012 (for intervention/impleadment), 16845/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment), 16882/2012 (for intervention/ impleadment) DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Mr.A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Shyam Sharma, Mr.Mohit Gupta, Mr.Amit Saxena, Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, Advs. Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Mathur, P-2 in WP (C) No.4770/2012 in person and Ms. Sandhya Gupta & Mr.Ritesh Singh, Advs. Mr. Amit Khemka, Adv. with Ms. Sanorita D. Bharali, Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advs. for New Delhi Bar Association, Rohini Bar Association & Dwarka Bar Association for applicants in CM Nos.16545/2012, 16845/2012 & 16882/2012. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ......Respondents Through : Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nakul Dewan, Mr. J.M. Kalia, Mr. Raghav Shankar & Ms.Bhawna Garg, Advs. for Gov...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 03, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: October 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 3004/2010 MANOJ YADAVA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Arvind Nayyar, Mr.Pritpal Singh Nijjar, Mr.Pranav A.Kapoor, Advocates. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for private respondents. Mr.Sunny Choudhary, Advocate with Mr.C.D.Singh and Mr.Abhimanyu Singh, Advocates for State of M.P. W.P.(C) 5976/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG assisted by Mr.Ankur Chibber and Mr.M.P.Singh, Advocates for UOI. Versus RAJIV TANDON & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr.Mamta Tiwari, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
1. A. K. Singh (IPS), applicant herein, joined the Goa Police Service in the year 1983 as Grade-II Officer. He became eligible to be considered for promotion to the Indian Police Service (IPS) in April 1991, for which, however, the vacancy only occurred in 1995. Selection committee for consideration of the applicant for promotion to IPS was held only in 1997, and the applicant was allotted 1993 as the year of allotment. The only question raised in the present Application is that if the selection committee which has to meet every year or at least in the year when the vacancy occurs but could not meet for no fault on the part of the applicant, whether the year of his allotment to IPS should be calculated from the year the vacancy became available or when the selection committee actually met and favorably considered him for promotion to IPS.2. Brief facts giving rise to the present Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 reveal that the applicant was select...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2683/2012 RAJ KUMAR JHA Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms.Saahila Lamba,Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajinder Nishal, Advocate with Mr.Ashish Nischal, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms.Aditi Gupta and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for UPSC AND W.P.(C) 7710/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha and Mr.R.N.Singh, Advocates versus RAJ KUMAR JHA & ORS. Represented by: W.P.(C) Nos.2683/2012 & 7710/2012 ..... Respondents Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms.Saahila Lamba, Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms.Aditi Gupta and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for UPSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JU...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: April 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: April 22, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2683/2012 RAJ KUMAR JHA Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms.Saahila Lamba,Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajinder Nishal, Advocate with Mr.Ashish Nischal, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms.Aditi Gupta and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for UPSC AND W.P.(C) 7710/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha and Mr.R.N.Singh, Advocates versus RAJ KUMAR JHA & ORS. Represented by: W.P.(C) Nos.2683/2012 & 7710/2012 ..... Respondents Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Chaswal, Ms.Saahila Lamba, Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms.Aditi Gupta and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for UPSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JU...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No. 578/2010 % Judgment reserved on:05. 11.2012 Judgment delivered on:11.01.2013 ASHOK KUMAR ASWAL Through: ..Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Parekh, Mr. Shanmuga Patro, Mr. Shivanath Mahanta and Mr. Sanjay Aiswal, Advocates. Versus UOI AND ORS. Through: ..Respondents Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj and Mr. Jitender Choudhary, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh and Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, Advocates for Respondent CVC (R-2). Mr. P.K. Sharma, Standing Counsel with Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate for Respondent CBI (R-3). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.+ W.P. (C) No. 578/2010 1. The present petition has been directed against the order dated 21.10.2009, whereby the respondent No. 1 has accorded sanction under Section 19(1) (a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for the prosecution of the petitioner for the offences punishable under Section 120-B IPC and Section 7/13 (2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the...
Tag this Judgment!