Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india subsidiary banks laws amendment act 2007 section 19 amendment of section 39 Court: delhi Page 1 of about 1,374 results (0.401 seconds)

VipIn Kalia and ors. Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT541; 2007(95)DRJ14; [2007(113)FLR892]

..... reserve bank of india and the chairman of the state bank.13. the state bank of india, as already stated, has its own pension regulations. the employees of the state bank of india are bound by the same. letter/circular dated 11th december, 2000 refers to amendment to bank (employees') pension regulations, 1995. the said regulations are not applicable to the employees of state bank of india. the pension regulations applicable to the state bank of india employees ..... are different. as far as employees of state bank .....

Commissioner of Income Tax (Ltu), New Delhi vs.oriental Insurance Comp ...

Court : Delhi

..... of section 80 p (2) (a) (i) of the act, where an entity is obliged to place a part of its funds with the state bank or the reserve bank of india to enable it to carry on its banking business, then any income derived from funds so placed arises from the business carried on by it and the assessee has not, by reason of ..... that, in the said order, the revenue had actually given up the point.16. mr. syali places considerable reliance on the decision of the supreme court in cit v. karnataka state co-operative apex bank [2001]. 251 itr194(sc) where it was held that if, by the mandate of statute, investment is to be made as a pre-condition to carrying on ..... of the kerala high court in cit v. punalur paper mills ltd., [1988]. 170 itr37(ker) and the judgments of the supreme court in uco bank v. cit, [1999]. 237 itr889(sc) and uoi v. arviva industries india ltd., (2014) 3 scc159 according to him, both the cit (a) and the itat erred in simply following the itat s earlier order in the .....

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

..... of section 80 p (2) (a) (i) of the act, where an entity is obliged to place a part of its funds with the state bank or the reserve bank of india to enable it to carry on its banking business, then any income derived from funds so placed arises from the business carried on by it and the assessee has not, by reason of ..... that, in the said order, the revenue had actually given up the point.16. mr. syali places considerable reliance on the decision of the supreme court in cit v. karnataka state co-operative apex bank [2001]. 251 itr194(sc) where it was held that if, by the mandate of statute, investment is to be made as a pre-condition to carrying on ..... of the kerala high court in cit v. punalur paper mills ltd., [1988]. 170 itr37(ker) and the judgments of the supreme court in uco bank v. cit, [1999]. 237 itr889(sc) and uoi v. arviva industries india ltd., (2014) 3 scc159 according to him, both the cit (a) and the itat erred in simply following the itat s earlier order in the .....

Vijay Singhal and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... in a case involving plea bargaining; section 17 of the national investigation agency act, 2008; section 36aj of the banking regulation act, 1949; section 52 m of the insurance act, 1938; section 17 of the state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959. reference was also placed to statutes of other nations as well as international covenants and treaties to ..... emphasise the point that exclusion of media in order to ensure fair trial was not peculiar to india. reliance in this behalf was placed on the ..... section 377 of the ipc. in respect of this proposition reliance was placed on two judgments of the supreme court: state of punjab vs gurmit singh (1996) 2 scc 38.and sakshi vs union of india and ors. 2004 (5) scc 518.in addition, reference is also made to the 84th report of the law commission .....

State Bank of India Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1996)(81)ELT81TriDel

..... sd/- cif bombay total us$4,084,475/-authorised signatory the detail invoice was also filed separately. this is also reproduced herein below:state bank of india kindle software ltd.central office,______________________________________________________________________invoice no. 910701 credit no. 03/07/91______________________________________________________________________order no.______________________________________________________________________ detail invoice(including cost of and diskettes - ..... kindle in early august showing the break-up for the fees charged. the said details given in this invoice are reproduced herein below:"state bank of india kindle software ltd.central office,______________________________________________________________________invoice no. 910701 credit no. 03/07/91______________________________________________________________________your order no.______________________________________________________________________to supply of countrywide licence for indiakindle .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Abn Amro Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2007]138CompCas582(Delhi); 124(2005)DLT137; 2005(84)DRJ593; [2008]81SCL443(Delhi)

..... marketing network, started training people on payment of fee, to enable them to sell gold coins and make profits and as such, it was not falsely stated by respondent no. 2 in form fc(rbi) that it proposed to provide business management consultancy under nic code 893. column no. 4 was not ticked in this form as trading or export activities ..... section 19(1)(a) and 29(1)(a) read with section 68(1) and section 30(1) of the act, they also violated the rbi guidelines by opening bank accounts with respondent no. 1, abn amro bank, which also violated section 6(4) and 6(5) of the act for trading in gold coin vis-a-vis respondent no. 2 without ..... in contravention of any provisions of fera or any rule, notification, direction or order made there under cannot be sustained as this duty is only in those cases where the bank undertakes some foreign exchange transaction on behalf of someone but where the respondent no. 1 itself imported the gold and sold it to respondent no. 2, a company incorporated .....

Ashesh Devendrabhai Vyas Vs. State of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... scc108 as regards the complaints in question being hit by fema, it was submitted on behalf of respondent complainant that no specific permission from reserve bank of india under the fema is required as the foreign exchange management (transfer or issue of foreign security) regulation, 2000 permitted issue of such guarantees by ..... .m.c. 2817/2012 & crl. m.a.no.14106/2012 ashesh devenrabhai vyas ..... petitioner through: mr. a.r. gupta, mr. aaditya gupta & mr. vikrant arora, advocates versus state of delhi & anr. through: (iv) + ..... respondents mr. sudhir nandrajog, senior advocate with mr. mohit mathur, mr. amish dabas, mr. ujjwal k. jha, mr. devender dedha ..... crl.m.c. 2815/2012 & crl. m.a.no.14102/2012 ashesh devendrabhai vyas ..... petitioner through: mr. a.r. gupta, mr. aaditya gupta & mr. vikrant arora, advocates versus state of delhi & anr. through: (ii) + ..... respondents mr. sudhir nandrajog, senior advocate with mr. mohit mathur, mr. amish dabas, mr. ujjwal k. jha, mr. devender dedha .....

Ashesh Devenrabhai Vyas Vs. State of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... scc108 as regards the complaints in question being hit by fema, it was submitted on behalf of respondent complainant that no specific permission from reserve bank of india under the fema is required as the foreign exchange management (transfer or issue of foreign security) regulation, 2000 permitted issue of such guarantees by ..... .m.c. 2817/2012 & crl. m.a.no.14106/2012 ashesh devenrabhai vyas ..... petitioner through: mr. a.r. gupta, mr. aaditya gupta & mr. vikrant arora, advocates versus state of delhi & anr. through: (iv) + ..... respondents mr. sudhir nandrajog, senior advocate with mr. mohit mathur, mr. amish dabas, mr. ujjwal k. jha, mr. devender dedha ..... crl.m.c. 2815/2012 & crl. m.a.no.14102/2012 ashesh devendrabhai vyas ..... petitioner through: mr. a.r. gupta, mr. aaditya gupta & mr. vikrant arora, advocates versus state of delhi & anr. through: (ii) + ..... respondents mr. sudhir nandrajog, senior advocate with mr. mohit mathur, mr. amish dabas, mr. ujjwal k. jha, mr. devender dedha .....

B.K. Khanna and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. K.C. Nahar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi366

..... one. between them it is not, thereforee, an order 'under the act' within the meaning of section 38(1) of the act as construed by the supreme court in central bank of india v. gokal chund, (1967) delhi lt 1. the petitioner could not have, thereforee, filed an appeal against the impugned order. the controller had the' initial jurisdiction to entertain the ..... civil procedure code that it could be said to be without jurisdiction and, thereforee, a nullity, so as to be covered by the ratio of the supreme court in daula bhai v. state of mudhya pradexh, : [1968]3scr662 . it was after all an interlocutory order. (7) learned counsel for the petitioner urged that the petitioner must nave some remedy against such a wrong .....

Ifci Factors Limited vs.gangotri Iron & Steel Co. Ltd & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... an international contract where either the assignor or the debtor cs(comm) 1579/2016 page 8 of 10 or the assignee is situated or established in a state outside india; to payment of a monetary sum whether such right is existing, future, accruing, conditional or contingent arising from and includes, any arrangement requiring payment of ..... . the counsel for all the defendants, on being asked to respond, states that the defendants do not dispute their liability to the plaintiff. it is however stated that the defendant no.1 has been declared as a sick industry under the reserve bank of india guidelines and a technical consultant has been appointed for rehabilitation of the defendant ..... as defined in clause (f) of section 45-i of the rbi act, 1934 which has been granted a certificate of registration under sub-section (1) of section 3 or any body corporate established under an act of parliament or any state legislature or any bank or any company registered under the companies act, 1956 engaged in .....