Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india subsidiary banks laws amendment act 2007 section 19 amendment of section 39 Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 145 results (0.180 seconds)

Sukh Lal Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... act, 1956; (d) ........... (e) ........... (f) "banking company" means the state bank of india constituted under the state bank of india act, 1955, a subsidiary bank as defined in the state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959, a corresponding new bank constituted under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970, or a banking company as defined in the banking regulation act, 1949, or a financial bank or central bank as defined in the uttar pradesh ..... cooperative societies act, 1965 not being a land development bank .....

All India New Bank of India Employees Federation and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001LabIC4105; (2002)IILLJ253All; (2001)2UPLBEC1820

..... 1980 act.12. according to the explanation i. appended after clause (b) of subsection (5) of the section 9 of the 1980 act, 'banking institution' means a 'banking company' and includes the state bank of india or a subsidiary bank. the expression 'banking company' has not been defined in 1980 act. however, clause (c) of section 2 of the 1980 act provides that words and expressions used ..... into existence by re constitution of the banking institution or thecorresponding new bank, as the case may be. explanation i.--in this section, 'banking institution' means a banking company and includes the state bank of india or a subsidiary bank. explanation ii.--for the purposes of this section, the expression 'corresponding new bank' shall include a corresponding new bank within the meaning of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings .....

M/S. Hind Lamps Ltd. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1977)6CTR(All)0098A

..... of another if, but any if, that other is not subsidiary.(5)................(6) in the case of a body corporate which is incorporated in a country outside india, a subsidiary or holding company of the body corporate under the law of such country shall be deemed to be a subsidiary or holding company of the body ..... .32. the learned chief standing counsel contended that the relationship between the petitioner company and the customer companies, is that of holding company and subsidiary company.33. as stated earlier, in the explanation to clause (c) of sub-s. (4) of new s. 4 the expression holding company and subsidiary company have the same meanings ..... turn sell those products to wholesale dealers or others.3. we shall set out certain material facts which are not in controversy : the petitioner company was registered in india under the indian companies act, 1913. at present there are only five share holders of this company. they are :(1) bajaj electricals ltd., bombay.(2) crompton parkinson .....

Smt. Sharda Devi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2002All1; (2001)3UPLBEC1941

..... ) for relief against distress; (f) 'banking company' means the state bank of india, constituted under the state bank of india act, 1955, a subsidiary bank as defined in the state bank of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959, a corresponding new bank constituted under the bankingcompanies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970, or a banking company as defined in the banking regulation act, 1949, (or a financing bank or central bank as defined in the uttar pradesh ..... cooperative societies act, 1965 not being a land development bank;) (g) 'state sponsored .....

Pargan Chandra Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1977CriLJ903

..... on the basis of which the encroachment alleged by the prosecution was established. the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant had no merits. as stated above, the prosecution had not only given oral evidence establishing that the construction was made by the applicant on the road belonging to the public works department but ..... applicant with an intention of taking unauthorised possession of the government's road, this insistence to continue in possession even alter service of the notice by the state government to vacate premises, is incompatible with the innocence of the applicant and incapable of any explanation. in view of the above the finding of the courts ..... the learned counsel for the applicant appeal's to be well founded. this direction was, however, attempted to be justified by the learned counsel appearing for the state by taking recourse to section 522, criminal p.c. it appears that in order to apply this section it is necessary that the person has been convicted .....

Hind Lamps Limited Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Through the Secretary ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1977(1)ELT1(All)

..... but only if, that other is its subsidiary.(5) . . . . . . . . .(6) in the case of a body corporate which is incorporated in a country outside india, a subsidiary or holding company of the body corporate under the law of such country shall be deemed to be a subsidiary or holding company of the body corporate 'within ..... 25. the learned chief standing counsel contended that the relationship between the petitioner company and the customer companies, is that of 'holding company' and 'subsidiary company'.26. as stated earlier, in the explanation to clause (c) of sub-section (4) of new section 4, the expressions 'holding company' and `subsidiary company' have the same ..... turn sell those products to wholesale dealers or others.3. we shall set out certain material facts which are not in controversy. the petitioner company was registered in india under the indian companies act, 1913. at present there are only five share holders of the company. they are :1. bajaj electricals limited, bombay.2. crompton .....

Chandra Mohan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1969All230

..... of the constitution. these articles are included in the proviso to article 368. even an indirect change in them would require the ratification by the state legislatures. no such ratification having been obtained, the twentieth amendment was unconstitutional.18. mr. jagdish swarup submitted that keeping in view the correct connotation ..... persons appointed otherwise than through the selection committee prescribed there under, they would continue to remain, in force.14. the supreme court directed the state not to make any appointment under these rules. that direction would obviously operate in future. the supreme court also declared that the rules relating to ..... the simple fact of distribution of powers, but by the pre-existing constitutional provisions in certain state constitutions positively forbidding the legislature from exercising judicial powers. the learned chief justice noted that in india the legislature has more than once enacted laws providing that suits which had been dismissed on a .....

Sarjoo Prasad Vs. Iind Additional District Judge, Kanpur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1975All13

..... act, 1965, was held violative of article 14 of the constitution. that decision was considered by the supreme court in m/s. jain bros. v. union of india, air 1970 sc 778 and it was held that the retrospective operation of the payment of bonus act, 1965, which came into force on may 29, 1965, was ..... tenants. after hearing the parties the rent control and eviction officer granted the requisite permission. the revisions filed by the tenants before the commissioner as well as before the state government failed and were dismissed. on 9th february, 1971, the landlords filed seven separate suits in the court of the city munsif, kanpur, for the ejectment of ..... between landlords and tenants.16. it is well settled that under article 14 of the constitution the state is not to deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of india; but this does not preclude the legislature from making a reasonable classificationfor the purposes of legislation. the .....

Paramount Bio-tech Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2004]120CompCas18(All); (2004)2CompLJ446(All); [2004]49SCL77(All)

..... 2) mentions certain specific powers of the sebi, without prejudice to the generality of section 11(1).28. in paragraph 12 of the counter-affidavit it is stated that the securities market in india has grown tremendously over 'a' period. a number of entities, incorporated or not, had come into existence which promised attractive returns to investments made with ..... scc 98; hans muller v. supdt. air 1955 sc 367; navin chandra mafatlal v. cit air 1955 sc 58; chaturbhai m. patel v. union of india air 1960 sc 424; rai ramkrishna v. state of bihar air 1963 sc 1667, etc. in case of an apparent conflict between different entries of list i & ii, the same has to be decided ..... u.p. air 1981 sc 873; d.k. trivedi & son's case (supra); state of madras v. row 1952 scr 597; peerless general finance & investment co. ltd. v. reserve bank of india air 1992 sc 1033; harakchand ratanchand banthia v. union of india air 1970 sc 1453 etc., the nature of the right alleged to have been infringed, the underlying purpose .....

Jai Prakash Industries Ltd. Vs. Lalit Bhasin

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2003]45SCL31(All)

..... shares against purchase of 3,26,50,000 fully paid equity shares of rs. 10 each of jaypee hotels limited.16. that it is submitted, as already stated earlier, the promoter-directors of the defendant company has already drained and siphoned out huge amount of funds, as already explained in the earlier, paragraphs, on the ..... amendment, the defendant filed objection. the defendant-revisionist contended that the proposed amendment concerned the allotment of the shares and it is the security and exchange board of india (hereinafter referred to as 's.e.b.i.') which is proper forum to agitate the same. it also contended that the declaratory relief as proposed to ..... the defendant company to heavy risks by giving guarantees against loans taken by its subsidiaries, as otherwise the companies were not entitled to obtain any loan from banks and financial institutions. the details of investments, loans and guarantees are given in the following paras.7. that a summary of such investments made and loans .....