Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state bank of india subsidiary banks act 1959 schedule ii second schedule Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 1 results (0.114 seconds)

Nov 12 1982 (HC)

Mohan Singh Parihar Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1182

..... a careful reading of this section it clearly transpires that whereas the jurisdiction of every other criminal court to try an offence is restricted by the 8th column of the second schedule, the jurisdiction of the high court and the court of session is not so limited and these courts are competent to try all offences, provided the cases are properly brought ..... , that the high court and the court of session have powers to grant anticipatory bail to a person, against whom a case has been registered with a police station, situated outside the territory of the state is to be accepted, then a situation is likely to arise where the high court of jammu and kashmir may have to watch as a helpless spectator its order granting anticipatory bail to the accused in that ..... with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;(iii) a condition that the person shall not leave the state without the previous permission of the court;(iv) such other condition as may be imposed under sub-section (2-a) of section 497 as if the bail were granted under that section. ..... :(i) high court;(ii) courts constituted under a special act;(iii) courts of sessions; and(iv) courts of magistrates, section on further classifies the courts of magistrates into courts of judicial magistrates, namely, chief judicial magistrate, judicial magistrates of the first class, judicial magistrates of the second class, and special judicial magistrates and executive magistrates .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2003 (HC)

Jammu Dev. Authority Vs. Bhag DIn and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2004(1)JKJ1

..... the government order dated 17th september, 2002 was not endorsed to the authority, nor had they any knowledge about the passing of the same till it was brought to their notice by bhag din; secondly, the government in the order did not specify or identify as to out of which portion of the total chunk of 120 kanals of land, 15 kanals were allotted to bhag din and his sister ..... one of the functionaries of the government and, therefore, it could not challenge the order issued by the government without the sanction of law department and the government; secondly, that the order dated 17th september, 2003 had been implemented and possession of the land had been delivered to the respondents in compliance to the order passed by the court in owp no. ..... and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 14-a of the jammu and kashmir state evacuee's (administration of property) act, samvat 2006, sanction is hereby accorded to the transfer of 15 kanals of sarkar ..... the object of the rules is contained in its preamble which reads as under:'by virtue of article 226 of the constitution of india and section 103 of the constitution of jammu and kashmir and all other powers enabling in this behalf, and in supersession of the existing rules, the high court of ..... as annexure 'e' a copy of intikhab-i-jamabandi for kharif 1959 and rabi 1960 which also depicts the name of sahib ..... be done within three months from the date of receipt of this order and the schedule prescribed shall be strictly adhered to by them. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //