Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.11504/2021(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs. 11066/2021 (EDN-CET), 11369/2021(EDN-RES), 11951/2021(EDN-RES), 12071/2021(EDN-RES), 12074/2021(EDN-RES), 12136/2021(EDN-RES), 12244/2021(EDN-RES), 12247/2021(EDN-CET), 12248/2021(EDN-CET), 12249/2021(EDN-RES), 12337/2021(EDN-RES), 12413/2021(EDN-CET), 12418/2021(EDN-CET), 12419/2021(EDN-CET), 12509/2021(EDN-CET), 12722/2021(EDN-CET), 12849/2021(EDN-CET), 12986/2021(EDN-RES), 13081/2021(EDN-CET), 13091/2021(EDN-CET), 13444/2021(EDN-RES), 16993/2021(EDN-RES), 17127/2021(EDN-RES) IN W.P.No.11504/2021: BETWEEN:1. ALEKHYA PONNEKANTI D/O. VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO PONNEKANTI, L-3-6, PARAMOUNT RAGHAVENDRA APARTMENTS, 42-6, KUNDALAHALLI GATE, BENGALURU560037.2. HRISHIKESH SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR S/O. SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR, No.9, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SV LAYOUT, BHOOPASANDRA, BENGALURU56009. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AJOY K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.11504/2021(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs. 11066/2021 (EDN-CET), 11369/2021(EDN-RES), 11951/2021(EDN-RES), 12071/2021(EDN-RES), 12074/2021(EDN-RES), 12136/2021(EDN-RES), 12244/2021(EDN-RES), 12247/2021(EDN-CET), 12248/2021(EDN-CET), 12249/2021(EDN-RES), 12337/2021(EDN-RES), 12413/2021(EDN-CET), 12418/2021(EDN-CET), 12419/2021(EDN-CET), 12509/2021(EDN-CET), 12722/2021(EDN-CET), 12849/2021(EDN-CET), 12986/2021(EDN-RES), 13081/2021(EDN-CET), 13091/2021(EDN-CET), 13444/2021(EDN-RES), 16993/2021(EDN-RES), 17127/2021(EDN-RES) IN W.P.No.11504/2021: BETWEEN:1. ALEKHYA PONNEKANTI D/O. VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO PONNEKANTI, L-3-6, PARAMOUNT RAGHAVENDRA APARTMENTS, 42-6, KUNDALAHALLI GATE, BENGALURU560037.2. HRISHIKESH SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR S/O. SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR, No.9, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SV LAYOUT, BHOOPASANDRA, BENGALURU56009. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AJOY K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.11504/2021(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs. 11066/2021 (EDN-CET), 11369/2021(EDN-RES), 11951/2021(EDN-RES), 12071/2021(EDN-RES), 12074/2021(EDN-RES), 12136/2021(EDN-RES), 12244/2021(EDN-RES), 12247/2021(EDN-CET), 12248/2021(EDN-CET), 12249/2021(EDN-RES), 12337/2021(EDN-RES), 12413/2021(EDN-CET), 12418/2021(EDN-CET), 12419/2021(EDN-CET), 12509/2021(EDN-CET), 12722/2021(EDN-CET), 12849/2021(EDN-CET), 12986/2021(EDN-RES), 13081/2021(EDN-CET), 13091/2021(EDN-CET), 13444/2021(EDN-RES), 16993/2021(EDN-RES), 17127/2021(EDN-RES) IN W.P.No.11504/2021: BETWEEN:1. ALEKHYA PONNEKANTI D/O. VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO PONNEKANTI, L-3-6, PARAMOUNT RAGHAVENDRA APARTMENTS, 42-6, KUNDALAHALLI GATE, BENGALURU560037.2. HRISHIKESH SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR S/O. SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR, No.9, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SV LAYOUT, BHOOPASANDRA, BENGALURU56009. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AJOY K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.11504/2021(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs. 11066/2021 (EDN-CET), 11369/2021(EDN-RES), 11951/2021(EDN-RES), 12071/2021(EDN-RES), 12074/2021(EDN-RES), 12136/2021(EDN-RES), 12244/2021(EDN-RES), 12247/2021(EDN-CET), 12248/2021(EDN-CET), 12249/2021(EDN-RES), 12337/2021(EDN-RES), 12413/2021(EDN-CET), 12418/2021(EDN-CET), 12419/2021(EDN-CET), 12509/2021(EDN-CET), 12722/2021(EDN-CET), 12849/2021(EDN-CET), 12986/2021(EDN-RES), 13081/2021(EDN-CET), 13091/2021(EDN-CET), 13444/2021(EDN-RES), 16993/2021(EDN-RES), 17127/2021(EDN-RES) IN W.P.No.11504/2021: BETWEEN:1. ALEKHYA PONNEKANTI D/O. VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO PONNEKANTI, L-3-6, PARAMOUNT RAGHAVENDRA APARTMENTS, 42-6, KUNDALAHALLI GATE, BENGALURU560037.2. HRISHIKESH SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR S/O. SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR, No.9, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SV LAYOUT, BHOOPASANDRA, BENGALURU56009. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AJOY K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.11504/2021(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NOs. 11066/2021 (EDN-CET), 11369/2021(EDN-RES), 11951/2021(EDN-RES), 12071/2021(EDN-RES), 12074/2021(EDN-RES), 12136/2021(EDN-RES), 12244/2021(EDN-RES), 12247/2021(EDN-CET), 12248/2021(EDN-CET), 12249/2021(EDN-RES), 12337/2021(EDN-RES), 12413/2021(EDN-CET), 12418/2021(EDN-CET), 12419/2021(EDN-CET), 12509/2021(EDN-CET), 12722/2021(EDN-CET), 12849/2021(EDN-CET), 12986/2021(EDN-RES), 13081/2021(EDN-CET), 13091/2021(EDN-CET), 13444/2021(EDN-RES), 16993/2021(EDN-RES), 17127/2021(EDN-RES) IN W.P.No.11504/2021: BETWEEN:1. ALEKHYA PONNEKANTI D/O. VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO PONNEKANTI, L-3-6, PARAMOUNT RAGHAVENDRA APARTMENTS, 42-6, KUNDALAHALLI GATE, BENGALURU560037.2. HRISHIKESH SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR S/O. SUDARSHAN JAHAGIRDAR, No.9, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SV LAYOUT, BHOOPASANDRA, BENGALURU56009. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AJOY K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2005(1)ALD752; 2005(1)ALT310
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioners in both these writ petitions are students of four-year B.Tech., course in Aurora Engineering College, Bhongir, Nalgonda District, the second respondent herein. They allege that they have been regularly attending the classes during the academic year 2002-03 including the guest lectures and seminars conducted by the college. Though they were promised by the management of second respondent that attendance at guest lectures and seminars would also be reckoned for the purpose of calculating attendance as per B.Tech., course regulations, they were not given the benefit. Further, during the annual day function, the students were given five days preparation time but the same was not counted for the purpose of attendance and as and when the students did not adhere to dress code, absent was marked, as a result of all this, on the eve of annual/semester examinations on 30-4-2004, the petitioners were not issued hall tickets on the ground that they do not have...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1989Bom382; (1989)91BOMLR96; 1989MhLJ887
1. Lack of legal authority to introduce 'Pay and Park' on the public streets of Bombay is the burden of the song sung by the petitioners. The petitioners are the resdients in the vicinity of khodaded Circle, Dadar T.T. , bombay , for the past over 30 years . It is their case in short that they have been parking their vehicles in the Khodadad Circle for a number of years. The said, area , being essentially a residential area, had not much of parking spece during night time except the said Khodadad Circle. The respondents , the Municipal Corporation and the Muinicipal Commissioner, had in the past sought to introduce scheme of Pay and Park for cars. However the same was abandoned after representations against the said scheme were made and awrit petition challenging the same was filed. However , in the beginning of the year 1988, the respondents sought to re-introduce the said scheme. Under this scheme , the Khodadad Circle as also various other portion of the public streets were earmarke...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.66 OF2018IN TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1399 OF2018DHARANI SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD. PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.339 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.802 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1086 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1110 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1124 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1142 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1138 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1156 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1153 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1166 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1206 OF20181 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1212 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1236 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1296 OF2018SLP(C) No.31421 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1316 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1308 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1359 OF2018TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.65 OF2018IN TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) No.1404 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1363 OF20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1986SC468; 1985(2)SCALE1437; (1986)1SCC581; [1985]Supp3SCR1025
E.S. Venkataramiah, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is preferred against the judgment dated September 3, 1976 in Special Civil Application No. 1501 of 1976 on the file of the High Court of Gujarat filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in which the appellant had challenged the constitutional validity of the Town Planning Scheme No. VIII (Umarwada) in respect of certain lands situated at Surat City in the State of Gujarat, published under the provisions of the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') in so far as the said scheme pertained to the land of which the appellant was the lessee, alleging inter alia that it was vocative of Article 14, 19(1)(f) and 31 of the Constitution of India.2. The land in question originally belonged to one Ladli Begum. She granted a lease in respect of the said land in favour of a company called Nawab of Belha Spinning, Weaving and . under a document dated November 15, 1882 for a period of 99 years with effect...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1991)IILLJ394Mad; (1993)IIMLJ540
Mishra, J. 1. The question herein is whether the Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board is an institution established not for purpose of profit and thus excluded from the purview of Section 32(v)(c) of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. 2. The appellants herein in their respective petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution claimed that the Act would apply to their cases. The respondents maintained that it would not apply. Learned Single Judge has held : 'The Board is an institution established not for purpose of profit within the meaning of Section 32(v)(c) of the Bonus Act. The dominant purpose of its getting established is not profit earning. It got constituted to execute schemes for providing protected water supply and adequate drainage facilities to urban and rural areas in the State of Tamil Nadu. It is service and social welfare oriented with no dominant purposes of earning profit. In this view it can claim the exemption under Section 32(v)(c) of the Bonus Act'. 3. The appella...
Tag this Judgment!