Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state agricultural credit corporations act 1968 section 25 reserve fund Court: kerala Page 37 of about 363 results (0.257 seconds)

Deputy Commissioner of Customs Vs. AyeshA.A.V.

Court : Kerala

..... consideration, the legal heirs of the original lease holder, being the husband and the children, together collected the amounts to be paid as consideration and paid it to the corporation. however, since it was stipulated that the transfer of tenancy can be made only to one individual, the sale was made in the name of the son, who ..... person. provided that where the person (hereinafter referred to as predecessor), by whom any sum payable under this act including the amount required to be paid to the credit of the central government under section 28-b is not paid, transfers or otherwise disposes of his business or trade in whole or in part, or effects any change ..... powers. in the absence of any such judicial or quasi-judicial powers conferred on the authorities, the same can only be exercised by the courts on which the state has conferred its judicial powers.16. the provisions relevant for consideration is section 142 of the act and chapter ii of the rules relating to procedure for attachment of .....

Sales Tax Officer and Two ors. Vs. V.V. Pathrose

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1979]44STC223(Ker)

..... commissioner ofagricultural income-tax v. l. kochuvareed [1976] 103 i.t.r. 799 (s.c.)reversing the decision of this court in smt. lucy kochuvareed v. commissionerof agricultural income-tax [1971] 82 i.t.r. 845 (f.b.). this court alsoreferred to the decision of the supreme court in ghanshyamdas v. regionalassistant commissioner of sales ..... assessment inpursuance of an order of remand in appeal are only a continuation of theoriginal proceedings.5. the learned judge had placed reliance onthe decision in mathai v. state of kerala [1964] 15 s.t.c. 710. the decisionwas reviewed, and the reviewed judgment is reported in deputy commissioner ofagricultural income-tax and sales tax v ..... sales taxrules. the decision has therefore no application.6. counsel forthe respondent-assessee placed strong reliance on the decision of the supremecourt in jaipuria brothers ltd. v. state of u.p., a.i.r. 1965 s.c. 1213 at1216. if the facts of the case are properly understood, there should be nodispute in appreciating .....

Joseph @ Sunny and 8 ors Vs. Renny Thomas and anr

Court : Kerala

..... legal aspects have not been eschewed.24. learned counsel for the petitioners further relied upon a decision of the apex court in tulshiram sahadu suryawanshi and another v. state of maharashtra (2012 khc4573= (2012) 10 scc373 wherein, with regard to the drawing of presumption under section 114 of the evidence act it was held in ..... the tenant was late shri unnithan skaria. the contest by the petitioners herein that the entries in the assessment register are not correct, has been rejected by stating that no contra evidence has been produced. it was further observed that these documents are certified copies issued by the municipality which have been issued on the basis ..... context, referred to the definition of 'landlord' and 'tenant' under the act. it is also submitted that the appellate authority, even though has relied upon the principles stated by a division bench of this court in nabeesa abdul khader and others v. suresh kurian and others (2009 (2) khc64= 2009 (1) klt1020 by relying upon .....