Court : Mumbai Goa
Decided on : Aug-06-2015
..... initially forming part of the company petition, but would also include, such continuing cause of siphoning off funds and diversion of business. (v) a company is a corporate personality, formed normally to foster economic growth of the country. the provisions of sections 397 and 398 are a step towards ensuring that the companies formed for this purpose ..... bisht, reported in (2010)12 scc 204, in which the hon'ble supreme court had applied c.p.c. to writ petition although section 141 in terms states that the code shall not apply to petitions under article 226 of the constitution of india. it is submitted that while the regulations do not provide for application of ..... and connected questions of law and as such, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. 6. the facts, necessary for the disposal of the appeals, may be stated thus : sociedade de fomento industrial private ltd. (sfipl) is a company incorporated under the act. the said company was promoted by late shri modu timblo (mt) in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
Decided on : Sep-02-2015
..... and location of the acquired land, extent of land required to be set apart and expenses involved for development, 30% to 50% deduction towards development was allowed in haryana state agricultural market board and anr. vs. krishan kumar and ors. (2011) 15 scc 297; deputy director land acquisition vs. malla atchinaidua and ors. air 2007 sc 740; ..... counsel further submits that the land acquired was at a distance of one kilometre from sanquelim town and as such, had high potentialities for the use of non agricultural purpose. the learned counsel further submits that the land acquired had a gradient and as such, the question of any deduction on that count would not be justified ..... made for implementation of the public purpose for which land is acquired. in kasturi vs. state of haryana (2003) 1 scc 354) the court held: (scc pp. 359-60, para 7) 7 it is well settled that in respect of agricultural land or undeveloped land which has potential value for housing or commercial purposes, normally 1/3rd .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
Decided on : Aug-10-2015
..... ), to file the complaint and to depose on behalf of the complainant. after considering the various judgments, including the judgment in the case of, national small industries corporation ltd. vs. state (nct) of delhi and others, reported in (2009) 1 scc 407 and the judgment dated 22.06.2009 in criminal miscellaneous application no. 5/2009 passed ..... in consequence of a resolution of the board of directors, as such. admittedly, no such resolution is produced on record. in the case of, vpk urban co-operative credit society ltd. vs. shri. shaikh rucnoddin mohammed and another, reported in 2010 all mr (cri) 1085, the appellant-complainant was a co-operative society. the learned ..... by this court, in the case of, v.p.k. urban cooperative credit society ltd. vs. shri ramesh mahableshwar naik and another, it was held that the complaint filed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
Decided on : Dec-23-2015
..... under section 76 of the bombay revenue tribunals act, 1939. the learned senior counsel was at pains to point out that although section 76 of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act was couched in a much more emphatic language, by employing the words notwithstanding anything contained in the bombay revenue tribunal act ?, it was held that the revision ..... of this court in the case of krishnaji unde (supra). in that case, an order in execution passed by mamlatdar under section 73 of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, was subject to an appeal to the collector and thereupon, was made final. it was contended that in view of this finality attached to an order ..... railway co. ltd. vs. s.s. railway workers' union, (1969) 2 scr 131; (iii) srikant kashinath jituri and others vs. corporation of the city of belgaum, (1994) 6 scc 572; (iv) lalu prasad yadav and another vs. state of bihar and another, 2010 (5) scc 1; (v) nemi chand and another vs. edward mills co. ltd. and another, 1953 .....
Tag this Judgment!