Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: state agricultural credit corporations act 1968 section 10 managing director Court: delhi Page 5 of about 2,200 results (0.342 seconds)

M/S. the Kerala Agro Industries Vs. M/S. Beta Engineers

Court : Delhi

..... of ` 4, 48,053/- and for recovery of which the subject suit was filed..3. the appellant no.1/defendant, m/s. kerala agro industries, corporation ltd., a kerala state government undertaking, contested the suit and the basic point of defence was that out of the total sprayers supplied, the representative of the respondent/plaintiff one mr. m ..... appellants/defendants for having supplied a total of 417 numbers of golden rocker sprayers and 100 numbers of knapsack sprayers. the respondent/plaintiff is a manufacturer and supplier of agriculture, anit-malaria and other pest control sprayers and rfa no. 418/2003 page 1 of 23 spare parts. originally, the order which the respondent/plaintiff claimed was ..... may either depute one of your authorities along with mr. jose to this office to discuss the matter in detail and to find a solution, or send us the credit note as demanded vide our lr. no.ktr/s/58f/883 dt. 22-6-2000. thanking you, yours faithfully, for the kerala agro industries corpn. ltd. sd .....

Glaxo Smith Kline Vs. Union of India and anr

Court : Delhi

..... to the rate at which interest is claimed; (ix) the supreme court recently in nava bharat ferro alloys ltd. vs. transmission corporation of andhra pradesh ltd. (2011) 1 scc 216 was faced with an identical situation. there also during the pendency of challenge to ..... chaudhari vs. laxminarayan ramkishan (1974) 2 scc 293 though in the context of section 25(2) of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1948 and found to be equally applicable to section 7a of essential commodites act also held that failure and default ..... applicability of section 7a of the essential commodities act and which requires the person liable to deposit the amount to the credit of the account and who "makes any default in paying or depositing the whole or any part of such amount" liable ..... of such erroneous decision will not affect such restitution. lpa 971/2011 page 14 of 15 (x) in another recent judgment state of rajasthan vs. j.k. synthetics ltd. 2011 (7) scale 117 the supreme court enhanced the rate of interest for .....

Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

..... , means of communication, water supply, sanitation facilities and for the welfare of agricultural labour or for any other scheme approved by the state government for the development of the rural areas. this sub-section authorises the state government to spend the money credited to the fund virtually on any object which the state government considers to be the development of rural areas. the definition of ..... the population of which does not exceed 20,000 persons. it need not necessarily be a local area as it is ordinarily understood. ordinarily, a local area means a municipal corporation, a town municipality, a panchayat, a notified area, a sanitary board, etc. any geographical area the population of which does not exceed 20,000 persons can be conveniently brought within .....

Commissioner of Income Tax-vi Vs. Worldwide Township Projects Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... accepted from, or any loan or deposit taken or accepted by, (a) government; (b) any banking company, post office savings bank or cooperative bank; (c) any corporation established by a central, state or provincial act; (d) any government company as defined in section 617 of the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956); (e) such other institution, association or body ..... deposit where the person from whom the loan or deposit is taken or accepted and the person by whom the loan or deposit is taken or accepted are both having agricultural income and neither of them has any income chargeable to tax under this act. explanation. for the purposes of this section, (i) (ii) (iii) 8. banking ..... & fs, which holds more than 30 per cent. of the paid-up capital of the assessee, by journal entry in the books of account of the assessed by crediting the account of il & fs. having regard to the aforenoted findings, which are essentially findings of fact, we are in complete agreement with the tribunal that the provisions .....

ito Vs. Smt. Saraswati Ramanathan

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)300ITR410(Delhi)

..... in bonds, targeted exclusively on agricultural finance and highway infrastructure". in 2001 the section was widened to include bonds issued by rural electrification corporation ltd. and while explaining the amendment made by the finance act, 2001 by circular no. 14/2001 dated 12-12-2001 (252 itr st.65) the board stated in paragraph 39.2 that ..... of the capital asset must be invested certain specified assets such as bonds of nabard, national highways authority of india, rural electrification corporation ltd., national housing bank etc. these are corporations established by the government of india for development of infrastructure in the country and to muster funds for the purpose an incentive to invest ..... is an individual. during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2004-05 she sold 500 shares of itc ltd. for ea.5,43,125 and credited the proceeds to her bank account with icici bank, gurgaon. she had inherited the shares from her husband who passed away on 1-4-1993. she invested .....

Director of Income Tax Vs M/S Bagri Foundation

Court : Delhi

..... of the cpc was to clause (a) only. the supreme court decided, taking into consideration the circumstances and the history of the legislation. the supreme court in the commissioner of agricultural income tax v. the plantation corporation of kerala ltd. air 2000 sc 3714 was concerned with whether the "explanation" at the bottom of section 5 of the ..... conditions and with which we are not concerned at present. however, the explanation appended w.e.f. 1st april, 2003 to section 11(2) is as under:-"explanation. any amount credited or paid, out of income referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1), read with the explanation to that sub-section, which is not applied, ..... even to accumulation to the extent of 15% under section 11(1)(a).11. the supreme court in m.p.v. sundararamier & co. v. state of andhra pradesh air 1958 sc 468 and in mohanlal hargovinddas v. state of m.p. air 1967 sc 1022 held that the context and setting of the enactment governs the scope of the "explanation". in m .....

Krishak Bharti Co-operative Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT452

..... goi has also attempted to argue contrary to the letter dated 5.2.2007 of the additional secretary, ministry of agriculture to the effect that there was no compelling or convincing reason to amend section 35(2) of the mscs act ..... shall quarterly retire the shares held by the members other than cooperatives like government of india, the national cooperative development corporation and public financing institutions to the extent that the cooperative members subscribe to the equity of kribhco in order to facilitate ..... should act as a nodal agency and liaise with various agencies and get suitable guidelines issued to banks/district cooperative credit banks to give loans to farmers for acquiring membership of the society.16. it appears plain to us that it ..... . and shall be independent to take the financial decisions in the interest of the members and in furtherance of their stated objects;15. paragraph 2.3 of the ninth report of the standing committee on petroleum and chemicals (1999-2000) contains .....

inderjeet Singh Vs. Mcd

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 158(2009)DLT46

..... jt 1996 sc 746(ii) dda v. ravindra mohan aggarwal : [1999]2scr706(iii) rajasthan housing board and anr. v. g.s. investments : (2007)1scc477(iv) haryana state agricultural marketing board v. sadhu ram : air2008sc2411 .17. opposing the aforesaid plea, counsel for the petitioner strenuously urged the court to consider that the case of the petitioner for seeking directions ..... discharging its contractual obligations. in this regard, he relied on a judgment of the supreme court in the case of abl international ltd. and anr. v. export credit guarantee corporation of india ltd. and ors. reported as (2004) 3 scc 533. reference was made to explanation viii of section 11 of the cpc to contend that the ..... of 33 years. this was followed by a letter dated 08.05.1981 issued by the respondent/mcd to the petitioner informing him as below:dear sir,the corporation vide decision no. 1029/gw/corpn. dated 18.4.1981 have decided to allow you to continue in the above shop at the already fixed licence fee of .....

M/S Bansal Udyog Vs. N.C.T. of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... and instead monetary compensation for `40,000/- (rupees forty thousand only) was considered sufficient to meet the ends of justice.11. in jagbir singh vs. haryana state agriculture marketing board and anr. air 200.sc 3004.supreme court held thus, that by catena of decisions in recent time, this court has clearly laid down that an ..... /- (rupees fifty thousand only) as compensation keeping in mind the total length of service rendered by the workman was short and intermittent. in assistant engineer, rajasthan dev. corporation and anr. vs. gitam singh, (2013) ii llj 14.sc, supreme court has taken the similar view and held that reinstatement of workman with continuity of service ..... back wages, who had worked for three years was not justified and awarded compensation of `1 lac in lieu of reinstatement and back wages. in talwara co-operative credit and service society limited vs. sushil kumar (2008) 9 scc 486.supreme court held thus, grant of a relief of reinstatement, it is trite, is not automatic .....

Scooters India Ltd. Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... prescribed procedure and that monetary compensation in lieu of reinstatement and back wages in cases of such nature may be appropriate. in jagbir singh vs. haryana state agriculture marketing board and anr. air2009sc3004 supreme court held thus, that by catena of decisions in recent time, this court has clearly laid down that an ..... automatically passed. similar is the view taken by the supreme court in assistant engineer, rajasthan dev. corporation and anr. vs. gitam singh, (2013) ii llj141sc, m.p. state electricity board vs. smt. jarina bee 2003 llr848 talwara co-operative credit and service society limited vs. sushil kumar (2008) 9 scc486 thus it is clear that ..... mehta and this incident was reported to labour commissioner vide letter dated 12th august, 1989. as regards termination of respondent no.2 is concerned, it was stated that respondent no.2 had remained absent without any leave during the aforesaid period. respondent no.2 did not inform the petitioner about his sickness. letter .....