Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures enforcement act 1985 54 of 1985 section 17 procedure of registration Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.150 seconds)

Sep 04 1998 (TRI)

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-1998

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC591

1. These appeals have been filed against Order-in-Original No. 3/95, dated 29-12-1995 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi.Following are the particulars of the appellants :______________________________________________________________Appeal No. Name of the appellant Referred to asE/ 209/ 96- A M/s. I.T.C. Ltd. ITCE/210/96-A J.N. Sapru -E/211/96-A J. Narayan -E/288/96-A M/s. Asia Tobacco Ltd. ATCE/289/96-A M/s. Hyderabad Deccan Cigarette HDCF Factory Ltd.E/290/96-A M/s. Lakshmi Tobacco Co. LTCE/291/96-A M/s. Reliable Cigarettes RCTI and Tobacco IndustriesE/292/96-A M/s. Master Tobacco Co. MTCE/293/96 M/s. Crown Tobacco Co. CTCE/294/96-A R. Bhoothalingam 2. The particulars of demand of duty proposed in the show cause notice for the period 1-3-1983 to 28-2-1987 and demand confirmed and penalty imposed on the assessees are as follows :-_____________________________________________________________Concern Duty proposed Duty confirmed Penalty Penalty (in rupees) (in rupees) in...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 1998 (HC)

H.T. Somashekar Reddy Vs. Government of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-21-1998

Reported in : 2000(1)KarLJ224

ORDER1. Petitioner who is a retired Chief Engineer, has filed this petition as public interest litigation challenging the validity of agreement dated 3-4-1997, Annexure-A entered into between the Government of Karnataka and Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprises Limited, arrayed as respondents 1 and 2 (for short, 'respondents 1 and 2 respectively'). The agreement has been executed by the Secretary, Public Works Department as an authorised officer of respondent 1 under Article 299(1) of the Constitution of India, for and on behalf of Governor of Karnataka. By this agreement the second respondent is authorised to construct and provide Infrastructure Corridor Project between Bangalore and Mysore ('the Project', for short), consisting of residential, industrial plants, water treatment and other infrastructure developments as set out in the 4th para of the preamble in the said agreement. According to the petitioner the agreement entered into between respondents 1 and 2 is detrimental to ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1998 (FN)

Lopez Vs. Monterey County

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-02-1998

Lopez v. Monterey County - 525 U.S. 266 (1998) OCTOBER TERM, 1998 Syllabus LOPEZ ET AL. v. MONTEREY COUNTY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. 97-1396. Argued November 2, 1998-Decided January 20,1999 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires designated States and political subdivisions to obtain federal preclearance-either from the Attorney General or from the District Court for the District of Columbia-before giving effect to changes in their voting laws. Monterey County (County), a jurisdiction that is "covered" by 5, enacted a series of ordinances effecting changes in the method for electing County judges. Appellants, Hispanic voters residing in the County, filed suit, alleging that the County had failed to fulfill its 5 obligation to preclear these changes. See Lopez v. Monterey County, 519 U. S. 9 . The three-judge District Court ultimately dismissed the complaint on the ground that California, w...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1998 (FN)

Bragdon Vs. Abbott

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-30-1998

..... standard is the court of appeals' refusal to give weight 651 to petitioner's offer to treat respondent in a hospital. id., at 943, n. 4. petitioner testified that he believed hospitals had safety measures ..... as a "significant risk to the health or safety of others that cannot be eliminated by a modification of policies, practices, or procedures or by the provision of auxiliary aids or services." 12182(b)(3). this statutory definition of a direct threat ..... ) concluding that the rehabilitation act "protects symptomatic and asymptomatic hiv-infected individuals against discrimination in any covered program." application of section 504 of the rehabilitation act to hiv- infected individuals, 12 ..... filed a brief for the american dental association as amicus curiae. 629 patient registration form. petitioner completed a dental examination, discovered a cavity, and informed respondent of his ..... , and ... drug addiction and alcoholism." ibid. in 1980, the president transferred responsibility for the implementation and enforcement of 504 to the attorney general. see, e. g., exec. order no. 12250, 3 ..... airlines, inc. v. thurston, 469 u. s. 111 , 119, n. 14 (1985); dandridge v. williams, 397 u. s. 471 , 475, n. 6 ( ..... among adolescents and adults, 41 morbidity and mortality weekly rep., no. rr-17 (dec. 18, 1992); osmond, aids knowledge base 1.1-2 ..... , and perform the manual tasks necessary to rear a child to maturity. see app. 53-54. while individuals infected with hiv may choose not to engage in these activities .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //