Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures enforcement act 1985 54 of 1985 section 17 procedure of registration Year: 1991 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.073 seconds)

Apr 02 1991 (SC)

State of Bihar and anr. Vs. P.P. Sharma, Ias and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-02-1991

Reported in : AIR1991SC1260; 1991(2)BLJR767; (1991)2CompLJ197(SC); 1991CriLJ1438; 1991(2)Crimes113(SC); JT1991(2)SC147; 1992Supp(1)SCC222; [1991]2SCR1; 1992SCC(Cri)192

..... m the relevant provisions in the crpc, 1973, for short 'the code'. section 2(n) of the code and section 40 of the indian penal code defined the term 'offence means any act or omission which includes a thing ..... 1985 is the certificate given to the firm by the assistant director (agriculture) quality control, udaipur, rajasthan to the effect that samples of fertilisers taken from its factory were standard. annexure 7 dated august, 1986 is the letter from agriculture department, bihar to the agriculture department, rajasthan showing that the firm's registration ..... most frequent and immediate ethical pressures. despite many a stress associated with the enforcement and investigation functions-, the investigator must adapt a professional and uncompromising attitude. rather ..... t the fertilizers supplied were substandard and spurious and the bags do not contain the full weight, instead of returning the stock, a resolution was obtained from the managing committee to convert unsold old ..... documents annexures 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21/1, 22, 22/1, 24, 25, ..... act in any pre-conceived idea of guilt of the persons whose conduct was being enquired into or pursue the enquiry in such a manner as to lead to an inference that he was bent upon securing the conviction of the said person by adopting the measures ..... rs. 54 lac was paid to the firm. the samples of the fertiliser supplied by the firm were got tested by bisco from rajendra agriculture university, pusa which were found to be standard.4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1991 (HC)

Sharad J. Rao Vs. Subhash Desai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-1991

Reported in : 1991(4)BomCR156

H. Suresh, J.1. The petitioner Sharad Rao, a Member of the party of Janata Dal contested election to 42, Goregaon Legislative Assembly Constituency, held on February 27, 1990. Respondent No. 1, Subhash Desai, a Shiv-Sena Member, contested in the same constituency against the petitioner. Respondent No. 1 was declared as elected. There were other candidates from other parties who have all been made parties to the petition. The petitioner has filed this petition to set aside the election of respondent No. 1 on the ground of certain corrupt practices as provided under the representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1951). The charges are under section 123(1), bribery, by way of gift of various articles to the voters 123(3), appeal by respondent No. 1 or his agent or any other person with his consent to vote or refrain from voting on the ground of religion or community 123(3-A), promotion of or attempt to promote feelings of enmity or hatred between different...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1991 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Contra ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-27-1991

Reported in : ILR1991KAR3679; 1992(1)KarLJ477

ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J.1. The Question referred by the Division Bench for our consideration is:-'Whether the failure of the contractor through whom contract labour is engaged to obtain a licence under Section 12 of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970, (the Act' for short), will bring about the relationship of employer and employee between the said contract labour and the principal employer?'2. The appellant is engaged in the business of manufacturing Iron and Steel as well as the distribution and marketing of the said goods; for the purpose of its marketing activities it has stockyards at various places. It is stated that in all these stockyards the main activity concerned is of storage and distribution of Iron and Steel received from different steel plants. In the very nature of this activity, it is inevitable to have loading and unloading of these goods, which according to the appellant is an intermittent type of work. The volume of loading and unloading opera...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 1991 (HC)

Sir M. Visveswaraya Education Trust Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-06-1991

Reported in : ILR1991KAR2901; 1992(1)KarLJ61

Hanumanthappa, J.1. This Appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in W.P.Nos.17263 and 7621 of 1986 dated 8-9-1987. Appellants herein were the petitioners in W.P.17263 of 1986, whereas six others of Kolar District were the petitioners in W.P.7621 of 1986. Both the petitioners in the above two Writ Petitions had sought for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order passed by the first respondent in Order No. RDP 143 DTR 85/BANG dated 26-11-1985 and Corrigendum No. RDP 143 DTR 85/BANG dated 26-12-1985. The learned single Judge by the common order dated 8-9-1991 dismissed both the Writ Petitions.2. Since, the petitioners in W.P. 17263/1986 alone have preferred this Appeal, for disposal of this Appeal, it is sufficient if a few facts are narrated which necessitated to prefer this Appeal: The case of the appellants is that it is a Trust, made an application to respondent-1 for according permission to start a Rural Medical College in Kolar Taluk. The...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 1991 (SC)

Union Carbide Corporation, Etc., Etc. Vs. Union of India, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-1991

Reported in : I(1992)ACC332; AIR1992SC248; (1991)3CompLJ213(SC); JT1991(6)SC8; 1991(2)SCALE675; (1991)4SCC584; [1991]Supp1SCR251; 1992(1)LC505(SC)

..... act and the scheme attracted to this stage of processing of the claims. section 9 of the act enjoins upon the central government to frame a scheme providing for any or all of the matters enumerated in clauses (a) to (i) of sub-section (2) of section 9. the scheme, known as the 'bhopal gas leak disaster (registration and processing of claims) scheme, 1985,' was promulgated by notification dated 24th september, 1985 ..... regard to the scheme of the bhopal gas leak disaster (processing of claims) act, 1985, the incidents and imperatives of the american procedure of 'fairness hearing' is not strictly attracted to the court's ..... proper standards and ultimately stated:any denial by the indian courts of due process can be raised by ucc as a defence to the plaintiffs' later attempt to enforce a resulting jud ..... approximate. the wrongdoer is not entitled to complain that they cannot be measured with the exactness and precision that would be possible if the case, which ..... answer to this inquiry. indeed, sound reason and logic, as well as the great weight of authority, to be found both in text books and in the decided cases, affirm that no ..... subjected to a proceeding under article 32 of the constitution. thus what was said essentially obiter.17. the extracted part of the conservation from m.c. mehta's case perhaps is a good guideline ..... process. the contention (h) is disposed of accordingly.re: contention (i)54. the contention is that notices to and opportunities for hearing of the victims, whom .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 1991 (FN)

Gentile Vs. State Bar of Nevada

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-27-1991

Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada - 501 U.S. 1030 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991) Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada No. 89-1836 Argued April 15, 1991 Decided June 27, 1991 501 U.S. 1030 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA Syllabus Petitioner Gentile, an attorney, held a press conference the day after his client, Sanders, was indicted on criminal charges under Nevada law. Six months later, a jury acquitted Sanders. Subsequently, respondent State Bar of Nevada filed a complaint against Gentile, alleging that statements he made during the press conference violated Nevada Supreme Court Rule 177, which prohibits a lawyer from making extrajudicial statements to the press that he knows or reasonably should know will have a "substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing" an adjudicative proceeding, 177(1), which lists a number of statements that are "ordinarily . . . likely" to result in material prejudice, 177(2), and which provides...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //