Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures enforcement act 1985 54 of 1985 section 17 procedure of registration Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.106 seconds)

Rajendrakumar Natvarlal Shah Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC1255; [1991]70CompCas549(SC); 1988CriLJ1775; 1988(2)Crimes729(SC); (1989)1GLR239; JT1988(2)SC409; 1988(1)SCALE915; (1988)3SCC153; [1988]Supp1SCR287

1. This appeal by special leave brought from the judgment and order of the Gujarat High Court dated 21st November, 1987 and the connected petition under Article 32 of the Constitution are directed against an order passed by the District Magistrate, Panchmahals, Godhra dated 28th May, 1987 for the detention of the appellant under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 on being satisfied that it was necessary to do so, with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.2. It is not an undisputed fact that the appellant is engaged as a commission agent or broker in the rather lucrative but illicit business of liquor traffic at Godhra in the State of Gujarat where there is total prohibition by importing different varieties of Indian made foreign liquor in sealed bottles like scotch whisky, beer etc. from wine merchants of Vanswada in the State of Rajasthan. But then by engaging himself i...

Lakewood Vs. PlaIn Dealer Publ. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... detecting, reviewing, and correcting content-based censorship "as applied" without standards by which to measure the licensor's action. it is when statutes threaten these ..... require periodic licensing, and may even have special licensing procedures for conduct commonly associated with expression." ante at 486 u ..... general ordinance concerning "any . . . structure or device" on city property) on the books? that section vests absolute discretion (without any of the guidelines found in 901.181) in the city ..... . mayor of oradell, 425 u. s. 610 (1976) (registration requirement for political candidate or charity solicitation door to door), ..... . ultimately, then, the dissent's reasoning must fall of its own weight. as the preceding discussion demonstrates, this court has long been sensitive to the ..... the court of appeals page 486 u. s. 753 for the sixth circuit enjoining enforcement of its local ordinance regulating the placement of newsracks. the court's decision was based in part ..... 19 colum. j.l. & soc.probs. 183, 185-187 (1985). [ footnote 2/8 ] a city official testifying at trial ..... 1148. i also find the difference to be a significant one. [ footnote 2/17 ] until this litigation ensued, a lakewood ordinance banned the construction of any new ..... immunity, and "is liable for its negligence in the performance or nonperformance of its acts." haverlack v. portage homes, inc., 2 ohio st. ..... 54 -55, 380 u. s. 59 . even if judicial review were relatively speedy, such review cannot substitute for concrete standards .....

Indian Tea Packeting Industries and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1988(18)ECC180

..... section 2(f) of the said act included any process (i) incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product; and (ii) which is specified in relation to any goods in the section or chapter notes of the schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985 ..... competent to create rights, prescribe procedure and limitation for enforcement. the will of the legislature is the supreme ..... item 12). in this respect the view of the indian standard institution as regards what is refined oil as known to ..... article 14 of the constitution of india, as the mere weight of tea, put in a container of a packet without ..... section 12 of customs act, 1962 is amplified by what is provided in section 3(1) of customs tariff act. the customs duty charged under section 12 of customs act, 1962 is extended by an additional duty confined to imported articles in the measure set forth in section 3(1). thus, the additional duty which is mentioned in section 3(1) of the tariff act is not in the nature of countervailing duty. section 3(1) cannot be treated as a charging section merely because the statement of objects and reasons of section 3 says that section ..... said to be 'manufacture' within the meaning of that term in section 2(17) of the act and that the cashew-nuts were not sold in ..... the manner as indicated herein before.54. we have indicated hereinbefore, the ..... registration of the assessee. on the basis of the said determinations and on consideration of the definition of manufacture under section 2(f) of the said act .....

Godore Tools (India) (P.) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (1988)25ITD193(Delhi)

..... claim under section 40-a(8) of the act by rs. 1,10,240 enhancing weighted deduction under section 35-b ..... are the costs of production, the pressure of domestic demand, the supply constraints and the procedural bottlenecks, which, along with the non-price factors such as quality ..... sight imperceptible. the decision of the question is however not left to the application of any arbitrary standards. there are certain broad principles which guide the determination of the character of the receipt. some of ..... be read into this letter as it also clarified that the scheme of registration of export contracts for cash assistance purposes also covered products, the ..... or reorganizing the current schemes of cash assistance as effective export promotion measures...." in paragraph 4 of its report, the committee examined the viability of ..... gratuitous but was governed by proper rules and regulations and every citizen had a right to enforce its claim under it on the principle of promissory estoppel. the nature of the ccs ..... arising from our domestic fiscal policies or tariff barriers in importing countries....17. export policy resolution, further noted that in order to keep up the ..... which one of us was a party) vide its order dated 29-5-1985 was that the ccs was distinguishable from dbk and ie ; that it was paid for the purposes of the ..... of the tribunal that the commission paid to state trading corpn. was eligible for weighted deduction.54. in the present appeal, it is not known as to what are the exact facts and .....

Riley Vs. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind

Court : US Supreme Court

Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind - 487 U.S. 781 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind, 487 U.S. 781 (1988) Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina No. 87-328 Argued March 23, 1988 Decided June 29, 1988 487 U.S. 781 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Syllabus The North Carolina Charitable Solicitations Act defines the prima facie "reasonable fee" that a professional fundraiser may charge according to a three-tiered schedule. A fee up to 20% of receipts collected is deemed reasonable. A fee between 20% and 35% is deemed unreasonable upon a showing that the solicitation at issue did not involve the "dissemination of information, discussion, or advocacy relating to public issues as directed by the [charitable organization] which is to benefit from the solicitation." A fee exceeding 35% is presumed unreasonable, but the fundraiser may rebut the presumption by showing that the fee was necessary eith...