Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Col. P.K. Vasudeva, Member: 1. The complainant purchased a weigh-bridge vide Invoice No. 54 dated 29.3.1996 (Annexure CI) for Rs. 5,05,000/- from respondent. It has further been alleged that in reality weigh-bridge was installed and made operational in August, 1996. Within one month of installation, it started giving trouble. The respondent was informed and it promised to provide service under warranty to repair the load cells, monitor etc. The engineer of the respondent Company inspected and made some adjustments and repairs on three occasions but the weigh-bridge failed to give proper service. One of the service voucher is Annexure C3. The complainant approached the respondent several times for affecting repairs but there has been no response. The main plea of the complainant is that, firstly the respondent does not have a valid licence to sell weigh-bridge under the statutory provisions. Secondly, he has not been able to get the stamping done on the weigh-bridge because this is a st...
Tag this Judgment!