Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1994KAR439; 1994(1)KarLJ421
ORDERM.Ramakrishna, J1. These Writ Petitions have been referred to the Full Bench by the Division Bench consisting of Shivashankar Bhat and Ramakrishna, JJ., by invoking the power under Section 10(v) of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, by their Order dated 30.6.1992, for consideration. Hence, they have been taken up for consideration by this Full Bench.2. The legal contention urged in support of the Writ Petitions is that the Decision rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in RAJAMALLAIAH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA : ILR1985KAR1802 , requires to be reconsidered in view of the subsequent pronouncement of the Supreme Court in (1) DWARKADAS MARFATIA AND SONS v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF BOMBAY, : [1989]2SCR751 , (2) MAHABIR AUTO STORES AND ORS : [1990]1SCR818 . v. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION AND ORS., (3) KUMARI SHRILEKHA VIDYARTHI ETC. ETC. v. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS : AIR1991SC537 . and observations made by another Division Bench of this Court in STATE OF KARNATAKA v. K.M.SHANKARAN R....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to strike down the impugned rules notified dated 2.4.2016 issued by R-1 at Annexure-A as being Ultra Vires of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(G) and 301 of the Constitution of India and etc.This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, produced as Annexure-A.These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India PRAYING to strike down the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, passed by R-1, notified dated 2.4.2016 produced at Annexure-A as being Ultra Vires of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(G) and 301 of the Constitution of India and etc.) 1. Information Technology, and globalization have revolutionized our lives. The introduc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: Crl. A. No.835/2014 is filed Under Section 374 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure by the Advocate for the Appellant/Accused No.1 Praying that this Honble Court may be Pleased to set aside the Judgment and Order of Conviction and Sentence Both Dated: 27.09.2014 Passed by the 36th Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases against Kum. Jayalalitha and Others) at Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.208/2004 Convicting the Appellant/Accused No.1 for the Offence Punishable Under Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and Under Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code read with Section 13(1)(E) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and the Appellant/Accused No.1 is Sentenced to Undergo Simple Imprisonment for a Period of Four Years, and to pay a Fine of Rs.100 Crores. In Default to pay the Fine Amount, she shall Undergo Further Imprisonment for One Year For the Offence Punishable Under Section 13(1)(E) read ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF NOVEMBER2016BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN WRIT PETITION No.30917/2016 & WRIT PETITION Nos.31359-31361/2016 (MV) c/w WRIT PETITION No.30191/2016 (MV) c/w WRIT PETITION Nos.31673-31674/2016 (MV) IN WRIT PETITION No.30917/2016 & WRIT PETITION Nos.31359-31361/2016 BETWEEN:1. SATISH N. S/O. NARAYAN, AGED ABOUT27YEARS, RESIDING AT999 6TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, RAJENDRA NAGAR, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE 560047. K. MURALI S/O. K. NARAHARI, AGED ABOUT31YEARS, RESIDING AT:31. NETRAVATHI EXTENSION, DEVASANDRA, K. R. PURAM, BANGALORE 560036.2.3. MOHAMMED RIAZ PASHA S/O. ABDUL GAFFAR, AGED ABOUT47YEARS, RESIDING AT:8. PATEL DOWN, 5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN ROAD, RAHMAT NAGAR, R. T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560 032. 2 ABHINAYA KHATAVKAR S/O. RAMESH, AGED ABOUT36YEARS, RESIDING AT:67. 6TH A MAIN, 15TH CROSS, J.C. NAGAR, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE-560086. ... PETITIONERS4 (BY MR. UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR ADV. FOR MR. VIKAS N. M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayers: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the endorsement dated 09.07.2012 at Annex-N, issued by the R-2 and direct the respondents to reconsider the representation at Annex-L, given by the petitioners in the light of the final report of investigation submitted by the CID at Annex-J, vide covering letter dated 09.04.2012 at Annex-K and direct the respondents to take appropriate steps/actions with regard to the vitiated selection process of 1998, 1999 and 2004, Gazetted Group A and B Posts. This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus take corrective action of the recruitments and appointments on the basis of the CID report pertaining to the selection for KAS [Probationers] for the year 1998, 1999 and 2004 as per earlier the recommendations of the K.K.Mishra Committee Report and the final report was submitted on 09.04.2012, vide ...
Tag this Judgment!