Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h December, 2017 FAO3452016 and CM Appln.26849/2016 BRIJESH KUMAR VERMA ...... Appellant Through: Mr. Harvinder Singh, Mr.Jatin Kumar, Advocates versus AURANGJEB & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC GNCTD. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the order dated 6th May, 2016 passed by the Commissioner, Employees Compensation whereby compensation of Rs.10,69,008/- along with interest @ 12% per annum has been awarded to respondent no.1.2. The appellant is the owner of property bearing No.BU-48, Pitampura, Delhi on which a four storey building was being constructed in March 2012. On 6th March, 2012, the roof (lintel) of the third floor was being laid. Respondent no.1 and his father were FAO3452016 Page 1 of 72 working as labourers on the construction site, along with 12-13 other labourers. According to res...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h May, 2017 Pronounced on:03. d July,2017 + W.P.(CRL) 856/2016 & Crl.M.A. Nos. 4702/2016, 4704/2016, 10527/2016, 12181/2016 VIRBHADRA SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Jain, Mr. Madhur Jain and Mr. Parmatma Singh, Advocates versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr. Kunal Dutt, Ms. Karnika Singh and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. + W.P.(CRL) 2044/2016 & Crl.MA. Nos.10657-58/2016 CHUNNI LAL CHAUHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Jain, Mr. Madhur Jain and Mr. Parmatma Singh, Advocates versus ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr. Kunal Dutt, Ms. Karnika Singh and Mr. Vignaraj Pasayat, Advs. WP(C) 856/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 101 + W.P.(CRL) 2862/20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 184/2007 % Reserved on :21. t February, 2017 Pronounced on:27. h April, 2017 FEDERATION OF RETIRED LIC CLASS I OFFICER........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Mr.Ashish Garg, Ms. Mahima Rathi & Mr. S. Bushra Kazim, Advocates. versus UOI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Surajit Bhaduri & Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Advocates for LIC. Ms. Abha Malhotra, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav & Mr. Tanuj Chopra, Advocates for UOI. + W.P.(C) 9440/2016 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Surajit Bhaduri & Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Advocates for LIC. versus KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. Through Nemo. + W.P.(C) 9442/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA &ORS..... Petitioners Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Suraji...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h August, 2016 Pronounced on :08. h February, 2017 + CRL.A. 1284/2015 SUSHIL ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Arora and Ms. Radhika Arora, Advocates Versus Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State ..... Respondent STATE CRL.A. 53/2016 RAJESH PANDEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 190/2016 HEMANT GARG ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State + + Crl. A. No.1284/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 140 + + CRL.A. 1338/2015 VISHNU S/O PANCHU RAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja and Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocates Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State CRL.A. 283/2016 Through: Mr. Rajeev Mohan, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
1. On 3rd July, 2015, after commencing hearing in W.P.(C) No.4535/2015 which alone was before this Court till then, the following order was passed:- 1. The nine petitioners are the parents of seven children out of the total of 149 studying in respondent no.2 The Mirambika Free Progress School at Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi established by the respondent no.4 Sri Aurobindo Education Society. They have filed this petition seeking quashing of the decision of the respondent no.1 Management of the said school and the respondents no.2and4, of shifting of the said school from where it has existed for 25 years. Order, prohibiting the school from so shifting and prohibiting the use of the property where the school was earlier functioning for establishing a college, is also sought. 2. Notice of the petition was issued and vide order dated 6th May, 2015, ex parte so far as the respondents no.1,2and4 are concerned, inspection by the respondent no.3 Directorate of Education (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Gita Mittal, J. For many centuries, Indian society cherished two basic values of life i.e., Satya(truth) and Ahimsa(non-violence). Mahavir, Gautam Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi guided the people to ingrain these values in their daily life. Truth constituted an integral part of the justice-delivery system which was in vogue in the pre-independence era and the people used to feel proud to tell truth in the courts irrespective of the consequences. However, post-independence period has seen drastic changes in our value system.... In last 40 years, a new creed of litigants has cropped up. Those who belong to this creed do not have any respect for truth. They shamelessly resort to falsehood and unethical means for achieving their goals. In order to meet the challenge posed by this new creed of litigants, the courts have, from time to time, evolved new rules and it is now well established that a litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice wi...
Tag this Judgment!