Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Arvind Chaudhary, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.152/2013 RAKSHA JINDAL .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Bhuchar, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.159/2013 NIRMAL DEVI .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jatin Sehgal and Ms. Naina Dubey, Advocates : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocate...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
1. The appellant, NDMC, has challenged the impugned judgment and decree dated 22nd November, 2013 whereby the Trial Court has decreed the respondent's suit for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction. 2. Factual matrix 2.1. NDMC invited tenders for licence of plot No.37, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Marg, New Delhi measuring 0.66 acres for the construction and commissioning of a youth hostel to meet the requirement of ASIAD games in 1982. 2.2. M/s P.S.J. Housing Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. submitted the highest bid, which was accepted by NDMC and a licence deed dated 4th November, 1981 was executed by NDMC in favour of M/s. P.S.J. Housing Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. In terms of clause 22 of the licence deed dated 4th November, 1981, M/s. PSJ Housing Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. incorporated a public company, M/s.Prominent Hotels Ltd. With the object of taking over the youth hostel. 2.3. On 16th July, 1982, NDMC executed a licence deed dated 16th July, 1982 in favour of M/s Prominent Hotels Ltd. (hereinaf...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Gita Mittal, J. For many centuries, Indian society cherished two basic values of life i.e., Satya(truth) and Ahimsa(non-violence). Mahavir, Gautam Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi guided the people to ingrain these values in their daily life. Truth constituted an integral part of the justice-delivery system which was in vogue in the pre-independence era and the people used to feel proud to tell truth in the courts irrespective of the consequences. However, post-independence period has seen drastic changes in our value system.... In last 40 years, a new creed of litigants has cropped up. Those who belong to this creed do not have any respect for truth. They shamelessly resort to falsehood and unethical means for achieving their goals. In order to meet the challenge posed by this new creed of litigants, the courts have, from time to time, evolved new rules and it is now well established that a litigant, who attempts to pollute the stream of justice or who touches the pure fountain of justice wi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
1. On 3rd July, 2015, after commencing hearing in W.P.(C) No.4535/2015 which alone was before this Court till then, the following order was passed:- 1. The nine petitioners are the parents of seven children out of the total of 149 studying in respondent no.2 The Mirambika Free Progress School at Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi established by the respondent no.4 Sri Aurobindo Education Society. They have filed this petition seeking quashing of the decision of the respondent no.1 Management of the said school and the respondents no.2and4, of shifting of the said school from where it has existed for 25 years. Order, prohibiting the school from so shifting and prohibiting the use of the property where the school was earlier functioning for establishing a college, is also sought. 2. Notice of the petition was issued and vide order dated 6th May, 2015, ex parte so far as the respondents no.1,2and4 are concerned, inspection by the respondent no.3 Directorate of Education (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h August, 2016 Pronounced on :08. h February, 2017 + CRL.A. 1284/2015 SUSHIL ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Arora and Ms. Radhika Arora, Advocates Versus Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State ..... Respondent STATE CRL.A. 53/2016 RAJESH PANDEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashim Shridhar, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State ..... Respondent CRL.A. 190/2016 HEMANT GARG ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State + + Crl. A. No.1284/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 140 + + CRL.A. 1338/2015 VISHNU S/O PANCHU RAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja and Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocates Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP for State CRL.A. 283/2016 Through: Mr. Rajeev Mohan, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 184/2007 % Reserved on :21. t February, 2017 Pronounced on:27. h April, 2017 FEDERATION OF RETIRED LIC CLASS I OFFICER........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Mr.Ashish Garg, Ms. Mahima Rathi & Mr. S. Bushra Kazim, Advocates. versus UOI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Surajit Bhaduri & Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Advocates for LIC. Ms. Abha Malhotra, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav & Mr. Tanuj Chopra, Advocates for UOI. + W.P.(C) 9440/2016 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Surajit Bhaduri & Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Advocates for LIC. versus KRISHNA MURARI LAL ASTHANA & ORS. Through Nemo. + W.P.(C) 9442/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA &ORS..... Petitioners Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Mr. Suraji...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:03. 12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On:12. 05.2017 CRL.REV.P. 262/2016 ANOOP SINGH versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 263/2016 D. V. MALHOTRA versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 GOPAL ANSAL versus STATE CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 SUSHIL ANSAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner STATE ..... Respondent CRL.REV.P. 262/2016, CRL.REV.P. 263/2016, CRL.REV.P. 264/2016 & CRL.REV.P. 265/2016 Page 1 of 106 Advocates who appeared in the cases: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate with Ms. Arushi Tangri, Advocate, for Mr. Anoop Singh in CRL.REV.P.262/2016. Mr. Pawan Narang, Advocate with Ms. Vasundhara Chauhan and Mr. Karan Jain, Advocates, for Mr. D.V. Malhotra in CRL.REV. P. 263/2016 Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Kumar Jha, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Ansal in CRL.REV.P.264/2016. Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurpre...
Tag this Judgment!