Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 77 training at other places Court: union territory consumer disputes redressal commission ut chandigarh

Jun 15 1999 (TRI)

M/S. Sona Paper Boards Limited Vs. M/S. Weigh Masters

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

..... purpose. the facts and circumstances were thus distinguishable. 6. the main plea of the learned counsel for the complainants is that under section 22 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 the respondent should not have sold the weigh-bridge unless it has been verified and stamped and as per the provision ..... the responsibility of the respondent to get it stamped from the competent authority. section 22 of the standard of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 is reproduced as under : 22. prohibition of sale or use of unstamped weights or measures no weight or measures shall be sold or offered, exposed or possessed for sale, or used or kept ..... has been verified and stamped : provided that nothing in this section shall apply to any weight or measures which has been initially verified and stamped with a special seal referred to in sub-section (3) of section 41 of the standards act. a perusal of the aforesaid provision of the act shows that it was statutory .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2014 (TRI)

Ankita Khanna Vs. Dheer Dental Clinic and Another

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

..... and other members of the family remained under shock for long period. it was further stated that the opposite parties treated the complainant, very negligently and against the standard medical norms/procedure, which amounted not only to deficiency, in rendering service, but also indulgence into unfair trade practice. when the grievance of the complainant, was ..... ; rs.30,00,000/- as compensation for future cost of lifelong corrective treatment; rs.15,00,000/- as compensation towards the loss of her meritorious academic standard caused directly as a result of psychological trauma; rs.15,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony and physical harassment; rs.10,00,000/- as compensation ..... negative effects, on the complainant, as she could not eat properly, which affected her health and disposition. it was further stated that there was rapid loss of weight and even at the age of 18 years, she weighed 39-40 kgs. it was further stated that the complainant went into depression for which, she had .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //