Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 77 training at other places Court: customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal cestat ahmedabad Page 1 of about 1 results (0.092 seconds)

indica Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2007)(120)ECC113

..... which valuation under section 4a has to be applied. goods which can be notified are goods for which the retail prices are required to be affixed either under the standards of weights and measures act or other laws like drug (prices control) order. in respect of such notified goods, the central govt.also specifies the quantum of abatement from ..... price - (1) the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, specify any goods, in relation to which it is required, under the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (60 of 1976) or the rules made thereunder or under any other law for the time being in force, on the package thereof the ..... . 673/64/2002-cx dated 28.10.2002 dealing with valuation of multi piece package. the multi piece package has been defined under rule 2(g) of the standards of weights and measures (package commodities) rules, 1977. 4. i am also directed to say that there is no uniformity in valuation of multi-piece packages, consisting of 2 .....

Gujarat GoldcoIn Ceramics Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2008)(126)ECC134

..... the -- (1) central government may, by notification in the official gazette, specify any goods, in relation to which it is required, under the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (60 of 1976) or the rules made thereunder or under any other law for the time being in force, to declare on the package ..... when different mrps are adopted for different regions, printing of the name of the region is necessary. he draws our attention to the extracts of rule 6 of standards of weights and measure rules, 1977, which reads as follows: (1b) it shall not be permissible to affix individual stickers (labels) on the package for altering or making ..... for the said region. there is no requirement of specifying the region for which a particular mrp would be applicable as the same is also not envisaged under the standards of weights and measure (pc) rules, 1977 which provides for nature of declaration to be made on the packages.3.2. relating to supplies made to institutional buyers / .....

Castrol India Ltd. Vs. Cce and C

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2008)(126)ECC69

..... 4a can be resorted to, when the commodity is notified under the said section and there is a statutory requirement to affix the mrp under the provisions of standards of weight & measures act (packaged commodity) rules, 1977. the appellants are paying duty in accordance with the said section in respect of the retail packs of various ..... as in the case of retail pack.4. we find that the department has sought clarification from the legal metrology department, chennai, which administered the provisions of standards of weights & measures act. it stands clarified by the controller of legal metrology in their letter dt.21.4.05 that 210 ltr.pack will be covered under ..... such packages cannot be considered as wholesale packages. such approach by the adjudicating authority is not in accordance with the jurisprudence provisions. the authorities under the standards of weights & measures act are the best judge to decide as to whether a product is required to be affixed with a mrp under the said act or not .....

Mul Dentpro Pvt. Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2007)(117)ECC79

..... retail price under section 4a if central excise act, 1944 in cases where mrp is not required to be affixed on packings, as a statutory requirement under the standards weights and measures act, or any other law for the time being in force, even though some manufacturers may voluntarily be affixing the mrp on such packings. 2. ..... dated 11^th august, 1997 clarifying that sub-section (1) of section 4a applies only when the mrp is required to be indicated under the provisions of standards weights and measures act, 1976 or under any other law for the time being in force. in other words, section 4a applies only when there is statutory requirement of ..... valuation rules. in the present case, no doubt, the commodity, as such, in a broad sense has been notified under section 4a. however, rule 34 of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodity) rules, 1977 provides certain exemption from the requirement of bringing of mrp. the relevant portion is reproduced below: 34. exemption in respect of .....

Gujarat Gold CoIn Ceramics Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

..... retail sale price. (1) the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, specify any goods, in relation to which it is required, under the provisions of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (60 of 1976) or the rules made hereunder or under any other law for the time being in force, to declare on the package thereof the .....

Ucb India P. Ltd., Shri Girdhar Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (2007)(120)ECC420

..... when the goods are repacked from bulk pack to retail pack and relablled; that such labeling is a statutory requirement under the provisions of drug & control & cosmetics act; besides standards of weights ad measures act; that the products at the time of import was in a marketable condition and mere labeling would not render the product marketable; that the cbec circular no .....