Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 67 penalty for personation of officials Sorted by: old Page 31 of about 310 results (0.110 seconds)

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... at the same time. in the realm of conscience and of 'principles', there cannot be two weights and measures. there cannot be a morality for difficult times and another morality for easy times; one standard for military justice and another for civil justice. what then should be done with those individuals ..... given adequate guidance and information for determining the appropriate sentence, a bifurcated sentencing proceeding being preferable as a general proposition.175. if by "laying down standards", it is meant that 'murder' should be categorised before hand according to the degrees of its culpability and all the aggravating and mitigating circumstances ..... plainly and indubitably essential for rendering individualised justice. but where the discretion granted to the court is to choose between life and death without any standards or guidelines provided by the legislature, the death penalty does become arbitrary and unreasonable. the death penalty is qualitatively different from a sentence of .....

Kewal Krishan Puri and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1008; (1980)1SCC416; [1979]3SCR1217

..... and repair of buildings which are necessary for the purposes of the market and for the health, convenience and safety of the persons using it; (iv) provision and maintenance of standard weights and measures; (v) pay, leave allowances, gratuities, compassionate allowances and contributions towards leave allowances, compensation for injuries and death resulting from accidents while on duty, medical aid, pension or provident .....

Bharat Commerce of Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1979CENCUS447D; 1979(4)ELT527(Del)

..... the authority itself felt the same genuine difficulty, in this case, in absence of any identifiable standard for the prior period under the earlier trade notice from may 1, 1963 to october 15, 1974, this same blended yarn was treated as cotton yarn falling under ..... sought to be made then even blended yarn is covered under the synthetic yarn in entry 18, we would be clearly faced with this difficulty of findings no identifiable standards as to what is the correct test of predominance in wright, value, quality or tensile strength of the other blended fibre in such blended yarn. in fart ..... otherwise, it would be open to the authorities to apply different standards and tests in the present case the test now canvassed for the revenue is of brussel's nomenclature by applying the theory of predominant weight of fibre which test was discarded by the same authorities at the earlier stage when this blended yarn was treated as cotton .....

Bell Vs. Wolfish

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of whether the sanction constitutes an affirmative disability or restraint and whether it has historically been regarded as punishment. moreover, when the court applies this standard, it loses interest in the inquiry concerning excessiveness, and, indeed, eschews consideration of less restrictive alternatives, practices in other detention facilities, and the ..... require some measure of deference to the judgments of detention officials. their estimation of institutional needs and the administrative consequences of particular acts is entitled to weight. but as the court has repeatedly held in the prison context, judicial restraint "cannot encompass any failure to take cognizance of valid constitutional claims." ..... often point in differing directions." a number of the factors enunciated above focus on the nature and severity of the impositions at issue. thus, if weight were given to all its elements, i believe the mendoza-martinez inquiry could be responsive to the impact of the page 441 u. s. .....

Dunaway Vs. New York

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 8 ] the requirement of probable cause, as elaborated in numerous precedents, [ footnote 9 ] was treated as absolute. [ footnote 10 ] the "long-prevailing standards" of probable cause embodied "the best compromise that has been found for accommodating [the] often opposing interests" in "safeguard[ing] citizens from rash and unreasonable interferences ..... reason to suspect' was not adequate to support a warrant for arrest." id. at 361 u. s. 101 (footnotes omitted). the familiar threshold standard of probable cause for fourth amendment seizures reflects the benefit of extensive experience accommodating the factors relevant to the "reasonableness" requirement of the fourth amendment ..... presence of intervening circumstances, . . . and, particularly, the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct." ibid. but the court did not assign equal weight to each of these factors. given the deterrent purposes of the exclusionary rule, the "purpose and flagrancy" of the police conduct is, in my view, .....

Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts Vs. Feeney

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , 166 mass. 14, 43 n.e. 1005 (1896). the current veterans' preference law has its origins in an 1896 statute, enacted to meet the state constitutional standards enunciated in brown v. russell. that statute limited the absolute preference to veterans who were otherwise qualified. [ footnote 13 ] a closely divided supreme judicial court, in ..... .gen.laws ann., ch. 31, 27 (west 1979). [ footnote 12 ] veterans' preference laws have been challenged so often that the rationale in their support has become essentially standardized. see, e.g., koelfgen v. jackson, 355 f.supp. 243 (minn.1972), summarily aff'd, 410 u.s. 976; august v. bronstein, supra; rios v ..... in this action were concerned, the preference mechanics are uncomplicated. all applicants for employment must take competitive examinations. grades are based on a formula that gives weight both to objective test results and to training and experience. candidates who pass are then ranked in the order of their respective scores on an "eligible list .....

Steelworkers Vs. Weber

Court : US Supreme Court

..... s. 278 (1976). this court unanimously reversed, concluding from the "uncontradicted legislative history" that "title vii prohibits racial discrimination against the white petitioners in this case upon the same standards as would be applicable were they negroes. . . ." id. at 427 u. s. 280 . we have never wavered in our understanding that title vii "prohibits all racial ..... principal ways in which the court's "traditionally segregated job categories" approach expands on the "arguable violations" theory, still other considerations point in favor of the broad standard adopted by the court, and make it possible for me to conclude that the court's reading of the statute is an acceptable one. a. the first point ..... in griggs v. duke power co., 401 u. s. 424 , 401 u. s. 434 -436, and n. 11 (1971), the court refused to give controlling weight to the memorandum of senators clark and case which the dissent now finds so persuasive. see post at 443 u. s. 239 -241. and in quoting a statement from that .....

Sabha Chand Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1980RLR193

..... is clear from s. 3(2) of the act. judged by this standard there is unimpeachable evidence provided by the statute about the 'quality' and 'quantity' of this land. that both as regards its yield and ..... in terms of a new scale of measurement known as the 'standard arcre' invented by the act. that the 'quantity of yield' and 'quality of soil' are the two marks of good agricultural land ..... evaluated at 8 annas in a rupee per acre. this classification of the land has been made for the purpose of defining a standard acre. (see s, 3(20) of the act). it appears that the land was first converted into money and then remeasured ..... in question which is canal irrigated or nehri land. it has to be evaluated much higher. the judges have not given due weight to this factor. (18) it is the duty of the valuer to taice into consideration the intrinsic quality of the land and .....

Ganga Sugar Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC286; (1980)1SCC223; [1980]1SCR769; [1980]45STC36(SC)

..... , actual quantity of juice derived, actual quantity of sugar produced arid their earnings. they have not tried to prove that the standard of price would be more just and equitable than the standard of weight for levy of purchase tax. from the meagre data gleaned from the tariff commission's report, it is not possible to take ..... the view that tax by weight is unfair and inequitable. and article 14 ensures to the citizen the basic principle on which rests ..... not a discrimination. but classification can be sustained only if it is founded on pertinent and real differences as distinguished from irrelevant and artificial ones. the constitutional standard by which the sufficiency of the differentia which form a valid basis for classification may be measured, has been repeatedly stated by the courts. if it rests .....

Y.R.S. Rao Vs. Deputy Director of Agriculture and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1364

..... to the formula given by the importer or manufacturer at the time of registration and that the users of the insecticides are ensured supply of insecticides of standard quality approved under the registration certificate and persons engaged in the said business of import, manufacture, storage, distribution and sale conform to the provisions of ..... -9-77. the manufacturer of the said goods m/s. khandesh pesticides (private) limited issued indemnity guarantee that the quality is in conformity with indian standard institute specification, the petitioner firm in turn sold the said insecticide to certain other dealers with seals intact. the alleged deficiency in the gamma isomer of 5 ..... manufacture or the preparation of the insecticide as an article of commerce in a state fit for carriage or consumption, and not to increase the bulk, weight or measure of the insecticide or to conceal its inferior quality or other defect; or(b) in the process of manufacture, preparation or conveyance some extraneous .....