Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 67 penalty for personation of officials Page 31 of about 310 results (0.050 seconds)

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)(0)ELT00TriDel

..... use of the product since it imparts to the product certain statutory requirements under cigarettes (regulation of production, supply and distribution) act, 1975 and information required to be given under standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 and also the trade mark of the appellant-company. he submitted that sophisticated offset printing on the products in question is essential for ..... the use of the products but on the contrary it imparts on the products certain statutory information as required under cigarettes (regulation of printing, supply and distribution) act, 1975, standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 and also the trade mark of the appellant-company as required under the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 and the notifications issued therein .....

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kraftech Products Inc.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)(179)ELT43Tri(Mum.)bai

..... less than 10 gms. the dispute is whether such packages are exempted from declaring the m.r.p under rule 34 of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodity) rules, 1977 and consequently from the operation of section 4a of the central excise act, 1944. it is the claim of the respondents that they ..... packed together. we have perused the relevant provisions under the said rule 34. the exemption under the same clearly applies to any package containing a commodity if the net weight of the commodity is 20 gms or less. the language of the rule does not warrant the interpretation sought to be placed by the department that since the package ..... contains 3 units, the exemption under the rule is not available. we are of the view that since the combined weight of the 3 units of the impugned goods is less than the prescribed weight of 20 gms, the commissioner (appeals) has rightly concluded in his impugned order that the respondents are eligible for exemption under the .....

Bharat Cosmetics Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... , mwnbai v. urison cosmetics ltd. , holding that quantities of cosmetics weighing less than 10 gms., even though contained in multi-packs, will be exempt under rule 34 of the standards of weights and measures (packaged) commodity rules and consequently section 4a of the central excise act will not have any application to such multi-packs, will be directly applicable to the facts ..... by this common order. the issue in dispute relates to method of valuation of lipsticks/eyeliners in multi-packs.the weight of each individual lipstick is 4.3 ml and the weight of each individual eyeliner is 9 ml. in other words, the weight of both products is below 10 ml. in these circumstances, the decision of the larger bench of the tribunal .....

Indian Beauty and Hygiene Association and Another Vs. Union of India a ...

Court : Delhi

..... . there the manufacturer of ice cream had voluntary displayed the maximum retail price (mrp) on the package when in fact there was no such requirement in terms of the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977. there was also a specific display on the said packages that the "pack was not meant for retail sale." in the above ..... forming the subject matter of the present petition, are not covered under the lm act or the rules thereunder as they are cosmetics products each of which is of a weight or measure of 10 gram or 10 ml or less and, therefore, section 4a of the ce act is not applicable. 7. it is in the above context that ..... members of the ibha including the petitioner no. 2 are stated to be supplying to their wholesale customers in india various imported cosmetics products each of which is of a weight or measure of 10 gm or 10 ml or less. it is, accordingly, contended that the consignments of cosmetic products thus imported and subsequently sold are exempted under .....

United States Vs. Marigold

Court : US Supreme Court

..... constitution, it is declared that congress shall have power, among other things, "to coin money, regulate the value thereof and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures"; "to provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the united states." 1 stat. 14. by the twentieth section of ..... by the constitution for the very purpose, as assigned by the framers of that instrument, of creating and preserving the uniformity and purity of such a standard of value, and on account of the impossibility which was foreseen of otherwise preventing the inequalities and the confusion necessarily incident to different views of policy, ..... the constitution authorized to perform they are, when the public good requires it, bound to perform, and on this principle, having emitted a circulating medium, a standard of value page 50 u. s. 568 indispensable for the purposes of the community, and for the action of the government itself, they are accordingly authorized and .....

Lucas Indian Service Limited and ors. Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by P.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(1)ALT763

..... 29-11-1995 confirming the conviction passed by iii additional judicial first class magistrate, rajahmundry, in s.t.c. no. 69/1994 against a-1 under rule 2(r) of standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977, for short 'the rules', and sentencing him to pay a fine of rs. 1,000/- and also convicting a-2 and a-3 .....

Worcester Vs. Georgia

Court : US Supreme Court

..... have the sole and exclusive right and power of regulating the alloy and value of coin struck by their own authority or by that of the respective states; fixing the standard of weight and measures throughout the united states; regulating the trade and management of all affairs with the indians, not members of any of the states: provided that the legislative right ..... question. the response must be, so far as the punishment of the plaintiff in error is concerned, in favour of the one or the other. not to feel the full weight of this momentous subject would evidence an ignorance of that high responsibility which is devolved upon this tribunal, and upon its humblest member, in giving a decision in this case .....

Satyam Cineplexes Vs. Mark Paul

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... vices of deficiency in service, unfair trade practice, sale of defective goods that this law was brought on the statute book. main purpose was to inculcate the high standard of service, quality, quantity, purity, and potency for the service providers as well as traders and that was why each of these terms was defined exhaustively by the ..... the maximum retail price printed thereon is concerned it definitely falls within the arena of consumer protection law and has no relevance or relationship with the provisions of weights and measurement act and rules made thereunder. in latters case action taking authority is the government whereas in the formers case the customer or consumer dominates the ..... not the core activity as the sale for such item is one of the services rendered by the cineplex, hotels and restaurants and also that the provisions of weights and measures act are not applicable. some of the observations made by us in this regard are as under: so far as the sale of any article .....

Air Light Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2002)(145)ELT686TriDel

..... cooler kit is to be manufactured as per the specification of the buyer. with regard to packing the following is the instruction :- "packing : cooler kit to be packed in standard packing in following ways : (1) single unit packing for motor and subsequently to be packed in four unit carton. (2) single unit packing for blade and subsequently 4 ..... which is for assembly of home cooler (known as desert cooler etc.) is not an item covered under the weights and measures act or under the revenue notification.7. as against the aforesaid submission of the appellant, the revenue has contended that the mrp of rs. 1695/- has been ..... of electric fan at the mrp of rs. 1695/-.6. the appellants have also pointed out that valuation under section 4a is only in respect of goods covered by weights and measures act and rules thereunder and that notifications issued under section 4a are only in respect of goods so covered. they have pointed out that "cooler kit" .....

Ex Parte Siebold

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the state laws, be indictable for forgery as well as liable to impeachment? so, if congress, as it might, should pass a law fixing the standard of weights and measures, and imposing a penalty for sealing false weights and false measures, but leaving to the states the matter of inspecting and sealing those used by the people, would not an offender, filling the .....