Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 54 penalty for contravention of section 29 Court: jharkhand

Sep 11 2015 (HC)

Seth Purty and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Court : Jharkhand

..... appliances or apparatus were in possession or under custody or control of the petitioners, notices have been issued against the petitioners and that in view of section 62 of the standard weights and measures (enforcement) act, 198, the company should have also been made accused. it was also submitted that the hon ble supreme court in a recent judgment passed in criminal ..... no. 19 of 2007 whereby and whereunder, cognizance of offence under sections 45, 47 and 48 of the weight and measurement act, 1985, has been taken against the petitioners, the name of the act seems to have been incorrectly recorded in place of standard weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 and also prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding in connection with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2016 (HC)

B.K.Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... or apparatus were in possession or under custody or control of the petitioner, notice has been issued to the 2 petitioner and in view of section 62 of the standard weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985, the company should have also been made accused. it was also submitted that the hon ble supreme court in a recent ..... counsel representing the state relying upon the counter affidavit contended that the petitioner being the division manager of the said company was using weights and measure equipments, which were not as per the prescribed standards of the act, in clear violation of the provisions of the said act and the court below has rightly taken cognizance of the ..... brought to him at such place and within such time and shall, if he is satisfied that such weight or measure conforms to the standards established by or under the standards act, put his stamp thereon: provided that where any weight or measure is such that it cannot, or should not, be moved from its location, the inspector .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2013 (HC)

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... court below took cognizance against petitioner nos. 2 and 3, namely,sri a.c.sen, and sri swapan kumar mondal, respectively under sections 45 and 47 of the standards of weights and measurement (enforcement) act, 1985( herein after referred as the act of 1985) 2. the facts of the case in brief is that the petitioner no. ..... 214/05 by filing the present writ application.4. sri delip jerath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that according to the definition of weights and measuring instrument given under section 2(zc) of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 ( herein after referrred as the act of 1976), storage tank is not an instrument of ..... a special seal referred to in sub-section(3) of section 41 of the standards act."24. 1) "verification and stamping of weights or measures-(1) every person having any weight or measure in his possession, custody or control in circumstances indicating that such weight or measures is being, or is intended or likely to be used by him .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2015 (HC)

Kamla Kant ? Kamal Kant and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... against the petitioners, the offence is clearly made out against the petitioners and accordingly, there is no illegality in the impugned order.6. section 63 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 reads as follows:-"3. cognizance of offences.-notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)- ..... that only other allegation against the petitioners is that of tampering with the seal of the outfits, which is clearly covered by section 37 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, and this being an offence under the special act, no cognizance could be taken against the petitioners under the general ..... to be continued. learned counsel has taken a short point in support of his contention, drawing the attention of this court towards section 63 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985, submitting that there is a complete prohibition for taking cognizance under the said act, except on the basis of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2001 (HC)

Surendra Prasad Keshri Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2471

..... that the alleged occurrence had taken place on 30.7.1997 and the cognizance was taken on 5.6.2000 for an offence allegedly committed under section 24 of the standards of weights & measures (enforcement) act, 1985, punishable under section 47 thereof and the punishment prescribed is fine of upto rs. 500/-. patently, therefore, in terms of section 468. cr pc taking .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2015 (HC)

M/S National Petrolium Service Thr.Partnership and O Vs. State of Jhar ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... w.m. case no. 4 of 2002, whereby the court below has taken cognizance against the petitioners for the offence under section 39(2) of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985, (herein after referred to as the 'act'), on the basis of the prosecution report submitted against them by the inspector of ..... against the petitioners for the offence under section 39(2) of the said act, on the basis of the prosecution report filed against them by the inspector of weights and measures, chas, bokaro. the petitioners have also prayed for quashing the prosecution report in the said case.5. the inspection reports of the petrol pumps, ..... at jodhadih, chas, district- bokaro.2. madhav chandra modak 3. nityanand modak ..... petitioners. (in cr.m.p. no. 65 of 2005) versus 1. the state of jharkhand 2. inspector, weights and measure, bokaro steel city, bokaro . . opposite parties (in both cases) ------- for the petitioners : mr. rajesh kumar, advocate for the state : mr. arun kumar pandey, mr. v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2006 (HC)

Jawaharlal Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : AIR2006Jhar135; [2006(3)JCR525(Jhr)]

..... has highest green cover amongst the urban areas. over 10,00,000 tree saplings have been planted in the town during the past 10 to 15 years. the high standard of lift in jamshedpur is established by the fact that the town of jamshedpur has been certified as iso 14001 for the quality of civic ambience and all other facilities ..... industrial usage and potable water to citizens. it also collects, treats and disposes sewage with the help of two modern sewage treatment plants, which treat wastewater to environmental standards, the only town in india where 100% of the sewage can be collected and treated, before disposal. the potable water quality confirms to bis and who ..... standards. water is also supplied in tankers to the citizens, whenever extra water is required during personal and community function and also in cases of shortage and breakdowns.(ii) .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //