Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
..... purpose. the facts and circumstances were thus distinguishable. 6. the main plea of the learned counsel for the complainants is that under section 22 of the standards of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 the respondent should not have sold the weigh-bridge unless it has been verified and stamped and as per the provision ..... the responsibility of the respondent to get it stamped from the competent authority. section 22 of the standard of weights and measures (enforcement) act, 1985 is reproduced as under : 22. prohibition of sale or use of unstamped weights or measures no weight or measures shall be sold or offered, exposed or possessed for sale, or used or kept ..... has been verified and stamped : provided that nothing in this section shall apply to any weight or measures which has been initially verified and stamped with a special seal referred to in sub-section (3) of section 41 of the standards act. a perusal of the aforesaid provision of the act shows that it was statutory .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
..... . one does not know as to what is the definition of ideal treatment. if certain treatment is not ideal but proper treatment had been given as recognized by the international standard, then doctors certainly cannot be held responsible. 20. it is true, that the complainant had developed many problems leading to compartment syndrome , deep vein thrombosis or other post ..... that pop would continue till orandif with bone grafting was done. after surgery, he observed on 16.2.2000, that the bones were united and he was allowed full weight bearing. thus, he did not find any fault with the treatment given to the complainant by the doctors of pgi. he also did not suspect at that time that ..... . he again examined the patient on 16.2.2000 and stated that the surgery had taken place four months back and the bones were united and further advised full weight bearing and knee exercises to continue. his report did not state that the treatment given by pgi by giving pop on his left leg was wrong. on the other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
..... and other members of the family remained under shock for long period. it was further stated that the opposite parties treated the complainant, very negligently and against the standard medical norms/procedure, which amounted not only to deficiency, in rendering service, but also indulgence into unfair trade practice. when the grievance of the complainant, was ..... ; rs.30,00,000/- as compensation for future cost of lifelong corrective treatment; rs.15,00,000/- as compensation towards the loss of her meritorious academic standard caused directly as a result of psychological trauma; rs.15,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony and physical harassment; rs.10,00,000/- as compensation ..... negative effects, on the complainant, as she could not eat properly, which affected her health and disposition. it was further stated that there was rapid loss of weight and even at the age of 18 years, she weighed 39-40 kgs. it was further stated that the complainant went into depression for which, she had .....
Tag this Judgment!