Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: standards of weights and measures act 1976 section 27 secondary or working standard which may be stamped Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 1 results (0.266 seconds)

Sep 12 1989 (HC)

Pukh Raj and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1989WLN(UC)344

..... case no.l 154/87 and 1153/87 pending in the court of chief judicial magistrate, pali.3. briefly stated facts of the case are that inspector. weight and measures, pali inspected the country liquor shop of petitioners situated at pali on 17 6-1987 and found that liquor sold in the bottles was not in standard measurement. hence, contravention of sections 32 and 7/23 of the weight and measurement enforcement act, 1958 (here in after referred to 'act') has been alleged. learned chief judicial magistrate took cognizance against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 1993 (HC)

Agriculture Market Committee Vs. Prescribed Authority Under Rajasthan ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ10Raj; 1994(1)WLC97

..... contribution to marketing development fund. section 19 deals with the purposes for which the fund shall be expended and the fund can only be expended for the purposes of acquisition of a site or sites for the market, the maintenance and improvement of the market, constructions and repairs builings, and provisions and maintenance of standard weights and measures etc. one of the functions of the market committee is marketing development and it will be seen that under section 22-h there shall be a fund called the marketing development fund which shall be administered by the marketing board. this court in the case of narain hart .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 1958 (HC)

Bansidhar Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1959Raj191; 1959CriLJ1112

..... opium dealer in the town of sambhar. the station house officer, sambhar received a complaint that the applicant and radhey lal kept two sets of weights in their shop and that one set of the weights was less in weight than the standard weight, and that he defrauded the public by using false weights. the station house officer made a search of the shop of the accused under section 153 cr. p. c. and he recovered two sets of weights. the weights were recovered from beneath the gunny bag on which the applicant was sitting at the time of recovery. the police challaned bansidhar and radheylal for offences .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1981 (HC)

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Chirag Enterprises and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1982Raj169; 1981()WLN112

..... hostelier for the prescribed length of time and on the facts of that case it was held that the international airport authority of india was not entitled to act arbitrarily in accepting the tender of the 4th respondents, but was bound to conform to the standard or norm laid down in para t of the notice inviting tenders and it was further observed that the first respondent, namely, international airport authority-in accepting the tender of the 4th respondents denied equality of opportunity to others ..... reach a decision already in their view. it appears that when the samples were compared by the technical expert, who himself was the member of the committee, it was found that there is a considerable variance in the samples in thickness and weight per meter and it was also considered what certificates would be accepted containing what requirements. so on the basis of the expert report, the committee decided not to enter into a rate contract. as to the requirements of specifications and test .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1968 (HC)

Chaturvedi (R.P.) and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1969)ILLJ169Raj

..... 4a), (7) and (15). they read as follows :(4a) to admit colleges and institutions to the privileges of the university and to withdraw such privileges. to inspect affiliated colleges and approved institutions and to take measures to ensure that proper standards of teaching, instruction and training are maintained in them. (15) to do all such other acts, whether incidental to the powers aforesaid or not, as may be requisite in order to further the objects of the university as an educational body, and to cultivate ..... opinion on this matter, we think that it would not be a bad standard to give due weight to the period spent in practice in speciality. be that as it may, the standards so fixed must be, in a matter (sic) of speaking, arbitrary, for anyone can say that different standards would be most suitable for the purpose in view, it would be largely a matter of opinion and unless the standards prescribed are so unrelated to the securing of proper persons for appointment as professors, no one .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2002 (HC)

Dr. Zabar Singh Solanki and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002(4)WLN182

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. Both the writ petitions mentioned above are being decided by this common order as in both of them matter in dispute is the same.2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1071/1991This writ petition was initially filed by the Rajasthan Agriculture University Assistant Professors Association through its Secretary Zabar Singh Solanki, but later on, 54 petitioners were added as individual party and thus, this writ petition was treated to be filed by the petitioners against the respondents. It was stated in the writ petition that the petitioners are Assistant Professors in the respondent No. 2 Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner (hereinafter referred to as 'the Agriculture University') constituted under Rajasthan Agriculture University Ordinance later-on replaced by Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of, 1987').The petitioners were initially appointed as Research Assistants in the erstwhile University of Udaipur, later...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2007 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Tej Enterprises and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj397

..... illegal nor could it be taken as violative of the license order. the appellate court has relied on the various judgments available on the subject. it was argued that in the past also the respondents had been receiving the gas cylinders not having the standard weight and they had been repeatedly informing the divisional office of the 10cl about this and this issue was raised before the collector also during confiscation proceedings of the gas cylinders. the collector however without making enquiry into this aspect proceeded to ..... authority within 48 hours. what is important to be considered is whether seizure of as many as 264 gas cylinders which included 2 7 empty gas-cylinders from other company and 58 gas cylinders having less than the standard weight, can be accepted as the case of temporary storage and therefore even if the petitioner did not inform the licensing authority, that would not result in breach of the condition of licence because the period of 48 hours had yet not expired .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1994 (HC)

Arvind Textiles Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1994Raj195; 1994(1)WLN66

K.C. Agrawal, C.J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks, (a) for setting aside the notification dated 27-12-1989 (Annex. 4); and (b) for directing the respondents not to levy any water pollution prevention fee on the petitioner on the grey cloth brought by it within the limits of respondent Municipal Board.2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of cloth. It purchases, inter alia, grey cloth from various markets situated in different parts of the country and brings them within the Municipal limits of the Municipal Board, Balotara (for short, 'the Board') for the purposes of business in which it is engaged.3. Vide impugned Notification dated 27-12-1989 (Annex. 4), the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 (for short, 'the Act'), was amended by the State Government and Rs. 15/- per bale as water pollution prevention fee has also been imposed in addition to octroi duty @ 0.50%. The notification dated 27-12-1989 reads as under:-^^th- ,l- vkj- 84 uxjikfydkckysr...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2003 (HC)

Om Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1408

..... and effect of the evidence which the prosecutor proposes to adduce are not to be meticulously judged. nor is any weight to be attached to the probable defence of the accused. it is not obligatory for the judge at that stage of the trial to consider in any detail and weight in a sensitive balance whether the facts, if proved, would be incompatible with the innocence of the accused or not. the standard of test and judgment which is to be finally applied before recording a finding regarding the guilt or otherwise ..... framing the charges on general considerations of the material placed before it by the investigating agency. at this stage, the truth, veracity and effect of the judgment which the prosecution proposes to adduce are not to be meticulously judged. the standard of test, proof and judgment which is to be applied finally before finding an accused guilty or otherwise is not exactly to be applied at the stage of framing the charge. even on the basis of a strong suspicion founded on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 1992 (HC)

Dalpatraj Bhandari Vs. the President of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1993Raj1

..... objective approach to the recommendation proceeding from the high court. besides, the chief justice of india possesses the advantage of viewing the matter from the superior plane of a national perspective. he is seized with knowledge of prevailing standards and trends in the different high courts, and as the head of the highest court in india exercising appellate jurisdiction over the high courts by way of the widest power under article 136, he would be cognisant of the need ..... article 217 of our constitution from section 220 of the govt. of india act, 1935 clearly establishes that the advice tendered by the judicial functionaries was considered to be a safeguard against arbitrary appointments and, therefore, entitled to the greatest weight. it may be pointed out that appointments in england to the court of appeal, to the judicial committee of the house of lords and to the offices of lord chief justice and president of the family division are made on the advice of the prime minister after .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //