Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DR. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2013 24TH ASHADHA, 1935 WA.No. 766 of 2013 () IN WP(C).5025/2011 ------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5025/2011 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 26 03-2013 APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER: ------------------------ DR.ABRAHAM KURUVILLA, ADDLITIONAL PROFESSOR OF NEUROLOGY, SREE CHITHRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695011. BY ADVS.SRI.KRB.KAIMAL (SR.) SRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: -------------------------- 1. SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695011 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.2. PRESIDENT, INSTITUTE BODY AND GOVERNING BODY, SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND PRINCIPAL SCIENTIFIC ADVISOR TO THE GOVERNM...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (2008)4MLJ680
ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The petitioner is the statutory authority under the provisions of Administrators General Act, 1913 (Act 3 of 1913), which is now repealed by Amendment Act of 1963, viz. Administrators General Act, 1963 (45 of 1963), administering the property of C. Kandasamy Naidu Trust, as per the order of Probate dated 5.10.1948 made in O.P. No. 278 of 1948 on the file of this Court probating the Will dated 21.5.1948. It is, therefore, obvious that after the order of probate dated 5.10.1948, referred to above, all property both movable and immovable of the trust vests with the Administrator General and Official Trustee (in brevity 'AGOT').2. The lands belonging to the Trust of an extent of 103 grounds 0796 sq.ft situated in Survey Nos.2930/1, 2930/2, 2931 and 2932/1 of Purasawalkam Village of Madras District were proposed to be acquired by the respondent/Housing Board for a public purpose, viz. Housing scheme by the respondent/Board, for which, a notice under Section 4(1) of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (2004)138PLR87
S.S. Nijjar, J. 1. This writ petition was admitted on 27.5.2003. The petitioner had made an application seeking permission to amend the writ petition under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC. When the matter came up for hearing it was prayed that the application for amendment be dismissed as withdrawn as the petitioner will confine his claim in this writ petition to his eligibility only for the post under contention. The request of the counsel for the petitioner was not opposed. Application for amendment was dismissed as withdrawn. The writ petition was admitted. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner moved C.M. No.3687 of 2004 for disposal of the writ petition in terms of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court on 24.7.2002 in L.P.A. No.2854 of 2001 (Medical Council of India v. Dr. Sukhwinder Singh Gill and another). This application came up for hearing on 19.3.2004 and the following order was passed:-'Present:- Mr. R.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sudhir M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE25H DAY OF JUNE20154TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 1339 of 2011 (S) --------------------------- PETITIONER : ----------------- D.B.BINU, ADVOCATE, GENERAL SECRETARY, RTI KERALA FEDERATION, COCHIN CHAMBER OF LAWYERS, PROVIDENCE ROAD, COCHIN-18. BY ADV. SRI.P.K.IBRAHIM RESPONDENTS : ---------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (CO-ORDINATION)DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. V.S.ACHUTHANANDAN, THE CHIEF MINISTER, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.3. UMMEN CHANDI, LEADER OF OPPOSITION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.4. KODIYERI BALAKRISHNAN, MINSITER OF HOME, DEPARTMENT OF HOME MINISTRY SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.5. SONI THENGAMAM, SARASAM, 14, KADAPPAKADA NAGAR KADAPPAKADA.P.O., KOLLAM-691 008.6. THE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSION...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1. Respondent is M.C. 131.0/02 is challenging the decree of divorce dt. 19.12.05 granted in M.C.No. 1310/2002 on the file of the II Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore, dissolving the marriage between himself and his wife petitioner in the said proceedings. The Judgment and Decree dated 19.12.2005 is a common judgment in M.C.No. 1310/2002 filed by the wife seeking decree of divorce under Section 13(i)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act and O.S.No.75/2003 also filed by the wife seeking decree of injunction against her husband restraining him from making false and defamatory statements against her in respect of their marital relationship. The Respondent husband in the proceeding is challenging the Judgment and Decree passed in M.C.No. 1310/2002 only. For the sake of convenience, parties herein are referred to by their status in M.C. Petition in the Family Court.2. The facts leading to this appeal are, petitioner is wife respondent is her husband. They are Hindus, their marriag...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : AIR1992Ker320; II(1992)DMC441
Varghese Kalliath, J. 1. This is an appeal is a matrimonial cause. Husband is the appellant. He is a Doctor, having very high educational qualifications in medical science. He is a Lecturer in Cardiology in one of the most reputed medical institutions --Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute of Medical Science & Technology. 1st respondent herein is his wife.2. Appellant filed a petition under Section 18 of the Indian Divorce not to declare the marriage between himself and 1st respondent null and void. According to him, there was only a form of marriage which took place on 10th May, 1979 at the Marthoma Syrian Church, Tatabcd, Coimbetore. Both of them belonged to Marthoma Syrian Christian Community. Their marriage was according to the rites of the Marthoma Syrian Church.3. After the marriage, appellant and 1st respondent stayed together at Trivandrum till 10-1-1981. Thereafter in Delhi till 20-6-1983and again at Trivandrum till 19-9-1983. A male child was born to them on 28-5-1980.4. The case of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : II(2003)ACC114; 2003ACJ1631; 2003IIIAD(Delhi)321; 104(2003)DLT234; 2003(68)DRJ128; 2003RLR333
ORDER'. The film had a patriotic fervor and was based on the 1971 Indo-Pak war. During the matinee show of the film, immediately after the interval, the audience in the cinema hall saw smoke coming out of the side of the screen. Most of the patrons sitting in the hall thought it was some special effect which was a part of the film Realizing little that a fire had broken out in the cinema building. By the time they realised that the smoke had engulfed the hall because of the fire in the building it was too late for many of them to leave the balcony. The entire balcony area and the stairs leading to the balcony were so full of smoke that it had became impossible for many of the patrons to go out of the building and as a result thereof 59 people, which included infants and children, lost their lives because of asphyxiation and about 103 other persons sustained injuries. Immediately after the incident of fire, the Lieutenant Governor vide order dated 14th June, 1997 ordered an enquiry into...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
COMMON ORDER P. JYOTHIMANI,J. The issue involved in all these cases relates to the commissioning of Units 1 and 2 of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project (for brevity, "KNPP"). Even though the prayers in these writ petitions are different, they are taken up together, since the issue is one and the same. W.P.No.24770 of 2011 2.1. This writ petition is a public interest litigation. The petitioner, who is an Engineering Graduate in Electronics and Instrumentation, claims to be a trustee of a public trust called "Poovulagin Nanbargal", which is connected with environmental and other issues. After coming to know from the newspapers that the Government of India, represented by the Department of Atomic Energy will commission the KKNPP by November, 2011, he has filed the said writ petition for a direction against respondents 1 and 3 to undertake a fresh and transparent review of KKNPP at Kudankulam, Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu by an independent body of experts, including those of the Departme...
Tag this Judgment!