Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sports broadcasting signals mandatory sharing with prasar bharati act 2007 chapter i preliminary Page 1 of about 10 results (0.155 seconds)

Aug 22 2017 (SC)

Prasar Bharati Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... telecast of all cricketing events covered by the media rights agreement.5. under section 3 of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 [hereinafter referred 4 to as the sports act, 2007 ]., the respondent nos. 3 and 4 are obliged to share the live broadcasting signals of sporting events of national importance with the prasar bharati (which owns the erstwhile doordarshan s channels/networks ..... enacted to provide access to the largest number of listeners and viewers, on a free to air basis, of sporting events of national importance 18 through mandatory sharing of sports broadcasting signals with prasar bharati and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 3 of the sports act, 2007, on the scope and width of which provision the core arguments have been advanced so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 2016 (SC)

Star Sports India Pvt Ltd. Vs. Prasar Bharti and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . the central government shall take all such measures, as it deems fit or expedient, by way of issuing guidelines for mandatory sharing of broadcasting signals with prasar bharati relating to sporting events of national importance: provided that the guidelines issued before the promulgation of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) ordinance, 2007( order 4 of 2007), shall be deemed to have been issued validly under ..... raises the issue regarding the scope of obligations of a television broadcasting organisation under the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as sports act ). we may mention at the outset that under section 3 of the sports act, a television broadcasting organisation is prohibited from carrying the live television broadcast of a sporting event of national importance on cable or direct-to- home .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2017 (SC)

Union of India Ministry of Information and Broadcasting Secretary Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... telecast of all cricketing events covered by the media rights agreement.5. under section 3 of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 [hereinafter referred 4 to as the sports act, 2007 ]., the respondent nos. 3 and 4 are obliged to share the live broadcasting signals of sporting events of national importance with the prasar bharati (which owns the erstwhile doordarshan s channels/networks ..... enacted to provide access to the largest number of listeners and viewers, on a free to air basis, of sporting events of national importance 18 through mandatory sharing of sports broadcasting signals with prasar bharati and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 3 of the sports act, 2007, on the scope and width of which provision the core arguments have been advanced so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2017 (SC)

Home Cable Network Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... telecast of all cricketing events covered by the media rights agreement.5. under section 3 of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 [hereinafter referred 4 to as the sports act, 2007 ]., the respondent nos. 3 and 4 are obliged to share the live broadcasting signals of sporting events of national importance with the prasar bharati (which owns the erstwhile doordarshan s channels/networks ..... enacted to provide access to the largest number of listeners and viewers, on a free to air basis, of sporting events of national importance 18 through mandatory sharing of sports broadcasting signals with prasar bharati and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 3 of the sports act, 2007, on the scope and width of which provision the core arguments have been advanced so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2017 (SC)

Sopan Foundation Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... telecast of all cricketing events covered by the media rights agreement.5. under section 3 of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act, 2007 [hereinafter referred 4 to as the sports act, 2007 ]., the respondent nos. 3 and 4 are obliged to share the live broadcasting signals of sporting events of national importance with the prasar bharati (which owns the erstwhile doordarshan s channels/networks ..... enacted to provide access to the largest number of listeners and viewers, on a free to air basis, of sporting events of national importance 18 through mandatory sharing of sports broadcasting signals with prasar bharati and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. section 3 of the sports act, 2007, on the scope and width of which provision the core arguments have been advanced so as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2018 (SC)

Star India Private Limited Vs. Department of Industrial Policy and Pr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... channels shall comply with the programme and advertising code prescribed under the cable television networks (regulation) act, 1995. to 5.2. the company shall ensure compliance of the provisions of sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) act 11 of 2007 and the rules, guidelines, notifications issued thereunder. code/standards 5.3. the applicant company shall adhere to any other guidelines/restrictions prescribed ..... . the central government shall take all such measures, as it deems fit or expedient, by way of issuing guidelines for mandatory sharing of broadcasting signals with prasar bharati relating to sporting events of national importance: provided that the guidelines issued before the promulgation of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing with prasar bharati) ordinance, 2007 (ord. 4 of 2007) shall be deemed to have been issued validly under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2010 (TRI)

Zee Turner Ltd. Vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Others

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

..... a sports channel is required to be shared with prasar bharati and having regard to the fact that a sports broadcaster merely get 25% of the advertisement revenue of ..... three months switch off a channel, their case ought to have considered separately. 3. a sports channel should have been considered on separate principles in as much as having regard to the provisions of the sports broadcasting signals (mandatory sharing of prasar bharti) act, 2007, no exclusivity can be maintained as the contents of ..... of distribution out of the hands of market participants and places them squarely into the hands of trai. one might ask whether the fact that broadcast signals continue to be regulated through trai mandated statutory interconnection/distribution/tariff clauses, rather than in the market, reflect a market failure, or whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2005 (HC)

Board of Control for Cricket in India, (Bcci), Rep. by Its Secretary V ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2005(2)CTC609; 2006(1)CTLJ495(Mad); (2005)2MLJ653

..... after negotiations, of the petitioner was us $308 million. the australia and south africa series were completed with the television and broadcast being made by bcci through ten sports for the production and set satellite singapore private limited for international telecast and prasar bharati on the national terrestrial network. therefore, ..... essential for the production of live cricket match for international standard.requirements of production unit 1. equipments of international standard for uplinking and receiving signals directly from the ground earth station including portable and hand-held earth station.2. sufficient number of highest quality of cameras (minimum requirement ..... cricketing event as the event owner or original license holder of the signals. it was also denied that the petitioner entered into any understanding with prasar bharti for the use of its terrestrial network for broadcasting/telecasting of matches as alleged. only espn produced the agreement with prasar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 2012 (HC)

Tata Sky Limited, Mumbai and Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Throug ...

Court : Chennai

..... , the high court held that levy of entertainment duty under section 3(3c) of the punjab entertainment duty act, 1955 for providing entertainment by broadcasting signals on tv sets is intra vires the powers of the state legislature. a reading of the judgment shows that the question that came up for consideration ..... was thus presented as treating the cable television network and dth as pari-materia. secondly, the intention of the government of india to make it mandatory for cable operator to transmit/re-transmit programmes of every pay channel through addressable system in the metropolitan cities within six months from 15th january, 2003 ..... i), "payment for admission" under section 3(m) and the charging provision under section 7: section 3(i) entertainment means any exhibition, performance, amusement, game, sport or race (including horse race) or in the case of cinematograph exhibitions, cover exhibition of news-reels, documentaries, cartoons, advertisement shorts or slides, whether before or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 2022 (SC)

Zakia Ahsan Jafri Vs. The State Of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... indulging in senseless and sectarian violence against its own members or neighboring villages. on 04-03-2002, a letter dated 02-03-2002 was received from dy. secretary, information and broadcasting department, govt. of gujarat by shri ashok narayan, in which it was pointed out by i & b deptt. that in view of the prevailing situation in the gujarat state ..... from the video footages of dvds exhibits pv/d-i to p-v/d-15 on the cds. however, in some of the clips of cds, the voice (audio signals) in the recording of dvds have not been produced. from this report, the technical veracity of the tape can be accepted on the basis of cfsl report. however, as ..... enquiry, collected certain information and submitted report to the nhrc, opining regarding authenticity of the recordings in the sting operation and operation kalank delineating four points: - (i) video signals in the footage of the dvds p-v/d-1 to p- v/d-15 match in respect of speech, utterances, laugher, stray ringing tones of mobile hand sets, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //