Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: spices cess act 1986 repealed Court: delhi Page 11 of about 8,716 results (0.127 seconds)

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Krishan Lal Narang Thr. Its Parokar Deepali Naran Vs. Central Bureau ...

Court : Delhi

..... whittle down the consistent case of the prosecution that a-5 was in telephonic communication with a-3, as the said questioning of sanjiv kumar (a-3) was merely being conducted by the learned prosecutor in terms of section 145 of the indian evidence act, 1872 by confronting/contradicting the witness vis- -vis his previous statement dated 19.07.2005 recorded under section 161 cr.p.c [part 8/s.no.12-misc exhibits- misc defence exhibits/page 80-99 @ page 89-90]., wherein he had made a statement to ..... any cognizance taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the ..... notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), no court shall take cognizance of any offence, alleged to have been committed by any member of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order in a state while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force therein, except with the previous sanction of the central ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Usha Rani Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... whittle down the consistent case of the prosecution that a-5 was in telephonic communication with a-3, as the said questioning of sanjiv kumar (a-3) was merely being conducted by the learned prosecutor in terms of section 145 of the indian evidence act, 1872 by confronting/contradicting the witness vis- -vis his previous statement dated 19.07.2005 recorded under section 161 cr.p.c [part 8/s.no.12-misc exhibits- misc defence exhibits/page 80-99 @ page 89-90]., wherein he had made a statement to ..... any cognizance taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the ..... notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), no court shall take cognizance of any offence, alleged to have been committed by any member of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order in a state while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force therein, except with the previous sanction of the central ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Dilbag Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... whittle down the consistent case of the prosecution that a-5 was in telephonic communication with a-3, as the said questioning of sanjiv kumar (a-3) was merely being conducted by the learned prosecutor in terms of section 145 of the indian evidence act, 1872 by confronting/contradicting the witness vis- -vis his previous statement dated 19.07.2005 recorded under section 161 cr.p.c [part 8/s.no.12-misc exhibits- misc defence exhibits/page 80-99 @ page 89-90]., wherein he had made a statement to ..... any cognizance taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the ..... notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), no court shall take cognizance of any offence, alleged to have been committed by any member of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order in a state while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force therein, except with the previous sanction of the central ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Prem Bahl Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... whittle down the consistent case of the prosecution that a-5 was in telephonic communication with a-3, as the said questioning of sanjiv kumar (a-3) was merely being conducted by the learned prosecutor in terms of section 145 of the indian evidence act, 1872 by confronting/contradicting the witness vis- -vis his previous statement dated 19.07.2005 recorded under section 161 cr.p.c [part 8/s.no.12-misc exhibits- misc defence exhibits/page 80-99 @ page 89-90]., wherein he had made a statement to ..... any cognizance taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the ..... notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), no court shall take cognizance of any offence, alleged to have been committed by any member of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order in a state while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force therein, except with the previous sanction of the central ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Kailash Kaushik Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... whittle down the consistent case of the prosecution that a-5 was in telephonic communication with a-3, as the said questioning of sanjiv kumar (a-3) was merely being conducted by the learned prosecutor in terms of section 145 of the indian evidence act, 1872 by confronting/contradicting the witness vis- -vis his previous statement dated 19.07.2005 recorded under section 161 cr.p.c [part 8/s.no.12-misc exhibits- misc defence exhibits/page 80-99 @ page 89-90]., wherein he had made a statement to ..... any cognizance taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of august, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the code of criminal procedure (amendment) act, 1991, receives the assent of the president, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force in the ..... notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), no court shall take cognizance of any offence, alleged to have been committed by any member of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order in a state while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty during the period while a proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the constitution was in force therein, except with the previous sanction of the central ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and ..... ors. [1986].3scr785 and jitendra kumar and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2008 (TRI)

Shri Manoj Aggarwal, Bemco Vs. Dcit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... of 1997, section 68 cannot be invoked when the declared asset is sold later and the sale proceeds are credited in the books of account.section 68 of chapter iv of the finance act, 1997, which provided for the voluntary disclosure of income scheme, 1997, says that the amount of the voluntary disclosed income will not be included in the total income of the declarant ..... interveners and the same has not been found to be acceptable by us for the reasons given us hereinafter.as held by us in this regard, the immunity given by section 68 of the finance act, 1997 incorporating vdis is limited to the extent that the existence of jewellery stands accepted and the amount credited in the books of the declarant to the extent of value of the jewellery ..... (1) the undisclosed income of the block period shall be the aggregate of the total income of the previous years falling within the block period computed, fin accordance with the provisions of this act, on the basis of evidence found as a result of search or requisition of books of account or other documents and such other materials or information as are available with the assessing officer and ..... and that it is enough if the note shows a prima facie case of existence of undisclosed income; that there is no limitation for commencement of proceedings under the act excepting in the provision to section 143(2), that even in respect of section 158bc there is limitation provided for conclusion of block assessment but not for commencement and hence the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1988 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Bhatnagar Vs. Shabnam Bhatnagar

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi122; 1989(16)DRJ105

..... , due to his own unexplained aversion for her, and under the irrational influence of his parents, and thus in view of the interdict, as enjoined by section 23(l)(a) of the hindu marriage act, he cannot be allowed to take advantage of his own wrong, and now seek a decree for divorce without establishing the legal ground of desertion of cruelty on which he founded his petitions ..... animus deserendi was a question to be drawn, on the basis of facts and circumstances proved on record and that in case the wife failed to prove that the husband was guilty of such acts of omission or commission which can be dubbed as tantamount to cruelty, and that when learned trial court had disbelieved the respondent's defense of appellant having been guilty of cruelty towards her; ..... having been disclosed, not only in the written statement filed by the respondent at the earliest opportunity, but also in the application moved under section 24 of the hindu marriage act for seeking maintenance pendente lite for herself and her child, the petitioner did not take any steps to make amends for the lapse, and when he did so at ..... judge, delhi, dismissing his petition for a decree of divorce by dissolution of his marriage with the respondent filed under the provisions of section 13(l)(ia)(ib) of the hindu marriage act, 1955, as amended by the marriage laws (amendment act of 1976). (2) it is a case of short lived marriage between the spouses, as revealed from the facts culled from the record, inasmuch as the wedding had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1995 (HC)

Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Territory of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 57(1995)DLT571

..... operation of abattoir even at the reduced level of 2500 are violating environment protection act, 1986, prevention and control of water pollution act, 1974, national and international labour laws and laws regarding welfare of animals, thereby making it impossible for the abattoir to supply ..... notice which has been sent by the ministry of environment and forest under section 5 of the environment protection act,1986 for closure of trhe slaughter house w.e.f. ..... (2) in this section the express in dangerous petroleum' has the same meaning as in the pertotem act 1934 (30 of 1954)(69) according to that section anything cannot be draided down the way at is being done by this apparou which is in clear contravention fo section 241, he submitted that now when the number of the ..... -(1) whoever fails to comply with or contravenes any of the provisions of this act, or the rules made or orders or directions issued thereunder, shall in respect of each such failure or contravention, be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 5 years or with fine which may extend to ..... (93) he submitted that the ministry of environment under section 5 of the act gave notice to the slaughte, house in the year 1987 and directed that it could conditionality run for one year subject to installing ..... is functioning illegally and it has to be stopped forthwith, he referred to section 21 of the air pollution act and submitted that there is clear violation of this act in functioning of the said slaughter house. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2010 (HC)

Suren International Limited Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the provisions of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 were invoked against the serving dig and his wife. ..... the purpose of the customs act on the one hand and the major port trusts act and the international airports authority act on the other hand are different. ..... in the context of the major port trusts act, the position was reiterated by the supreme court in om shankar biyani. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

..... it was a provincial legislature alone which could alter, repeal or amend the court fees act, after the coming into operation of the government of india act, 1935 .therefore, since the date of the coming into operation of the government of india act, 1935 the court fees act must be deemed to have continued to be in operation in the various provinces of india as a provincial act passed by the appropriate provincial legislature and not as a central act because the provincial legislatures alone had the ..... w.p.(c)no.4770/2012 page 336 of 531 labour (prohibition and regulation) act, 1986, employment of manual scavengers and constructions of dry latrines (prohibition) act, 1993, provision of panchayat (extension to scheduled areas) act, 1996 are few of the endeavours made by the legislature in the right direction. ..... 1986. xxx xxx xxx a telegraphic message dated 25th february, 1986 sent by the special commissioner, new delhi, addressed to two secretaries of the state of maharashtra and the secretary to the governor of the state of maharashtra ..... 647. in the 114th report on the gram nyayalaya (1986), the law commission had reiterated that it was the fundamental duty of every government to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution and had observed as follows: it is the fundamental obligation of every centralized governmental administration to provide ..... 594. not very far back, in the pronouncement of the supreme court reported at (1986) 4 scc767 bihar legal support society .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //