Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in : (1985)(22)ELT844TriDel
1. Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Limited is a public company limited by shares and is engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling and dealing in Ayurvedic medicines/drugs and other allied products. Besides manufacturing Ayurvedic drugs/medicines, they also manufacture Surmas like Himalaya Surma, Moti Surma etc. and also Dant Manjans like Dant Manjan Lal, Dant Manjan Black, Dant Manjan White.2. Prior to March 1, 1975 'Dant Manjan Lal' manufactured by the appellant was considered to be a patent or proprietary medicine falling under Item 14-E of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, but considered as not excisable to duty by virtue of the express exclusion in the description of the Tariff Item itself in favour of "medicines" which are exclusively Ayurvedic, Unani Sidha or Homoeopathic.3. Immediately after March 1, 1975, when a residuary item being Item No. 68 came to be introduced into the Central Excise Tariff Schedule for "All other goods, not elsewhere ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & CM APPLs. 3543/2015 & 25614/2015 Reserved on:13. h February, 2019 Decided on:08. h March, 2019 SHIVI TALWAR ....... Petitioner GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate with Mr. Vinay Kumar Shailendra, Ms. Worthing Kasar, Mr. Alok Pandey and Ms. Raunika Johar, Advocates.. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mrs. K.K.Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Govind Kumar & Mr.M.S.Akhtar, Advocates for Respondent/LAC/L& B/GNCTD. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rajeev Jha and Ms. Koma Sarout, Advocates for DDA. W.P.(C) 2296/2014 & CM APPL. 4817/2014 + K.K. GARG & ORS Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Advocate with Mr.Vishal Maan and Ms. Smita Maan, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 1974/2015 & connected matters .........
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1975Delhi32b
V.S. Deshpande, J.(1) Is India a secular State If so, in what sense These questions arc raised by this writ petition filed by a Hindu and the connected writ petitions Nos. 1225 of 1973. 235 of 1974 and 919 of 1974 filed by some Jains to challenge the legality of the programme of the celebration of the 2500th Anniversary of Bhagwan Mahavir's Nirvan (Salvation) extending over a period of one year from November 13, 1974 onwards by the Government of India.(2) The programme for the celebration drawn up by a National Advisory Committee consisting mainly of prominent members of the Jain Community and approved by the Government involving an expenditure of about rupees fifty lakhs by the Government includes the following:-Development of a national park named after Bhagwan Mahavir, Erection of stone pillars therein with inscriptions from his sayings, episodic treatment of his life by sculptors; Establishment of a museum of Jain art and paintings, a library of Jain literature; Setting up of a Nat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : AIR1990Delhi80; 40(1990)DLT361
Y.K. Sabharwal, J.(1) This family litigation has a chequered history. In order to appreciate the controversy between the parties it is necessary to give a brief resume of part litigation, pending suits and the facts.(2) Lala Girdhar Lal was son of Lala Panna Lal. There was a Joint Hindu Family of 'Panna Lal Girdhar Lal' which owned joint family business and properties, Lala Girdhar Lal had six sons, one of them being Bal Krishan Dass. Hari Krishan, Jai Krishan Dass, Brij Krishan, Chander Krishan and Avtar Krishan are sons of Bal Krishan Dass.SMT.Ram Kala Devi was wife of Bal Krishan Dass. Bal Krishan Dass had another son named Gopal Krishan. Bal Krishan Dass, Smt. Ram Kala Devi and Gopal Krishan Dass have since died. In the year 1961 Jai Krishan Das and his two minor sons filed a suit in the Court of Senior Sub Judge, Delhi, (Suit No. 317/61) claiming that they are members of Joint Hindu Family 'Panna Lal Girdhar Lal' which owns Joint Family business and the properties as given in the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Reported in : (1983)3ITD662(Delhi)
1. This is a revenue's appeal against the order dated 14-1-1981 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Chandigarh, in Appeal No. 412 (Coys.Trust, Rtk.) of 1980-81.2. The only point which emanated from all the four grounds mentioned in the appeal is that the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) granting a relief of Rs. 1,56,448 to the assessee's society under Section 80P(2)(a)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') after setting aside the assessment order of the ITO dated 19-9-1980 denying the said relief to the assessee's society is not correct under law.3. The assessee is a co-operative society and for the assessment year 1977-78 for which the previous year ended on 30-6-1976, it had earned income from purchase and sale of foodgrains and commission from distribution of fertilisers. For the sake of brevity the assessee is called 'society' in the rest of this order. The society filed its income-tax return on 14-10-1977 declaring an income of Rs. 7,310. After verifying the accounts ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI12h May, 2017 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on ____December, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on 3rd January, 2018 + CRL.A. 54/2004 R.S. DAHIYA Through : Mr.D.C.Mathur, Senior Advocate with ..... Appellant versus Mr.D.K. Mathur, Advocate STATE (THROUGH NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Inspector Rajeev Kumar, with Northern Range, Crime Branch + CRL.A. 81/2004 SHER SINGH Through : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate ..... Appellant versus with Mr.Lovekesh, Advocate GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Inspector Rajeev Kumar, with Northern Range, Crime Branch + CRL.A. 198/2004 ANIL KUMAR STATE Through : Mr. R.N. Mittal, Senior Advocate with ..... Appellant Ms. Suman Rani, Advocate versus Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Inspector Rajeev Kumar, Northern Range, Crime Branch. Crl.A. 54/2004, 81/2004 & 198/2004 Page ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI12h May, 2017 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on ____December, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on 3rd January, 2018 + CRL.A. 54/2004 R.S. DAHIYA Through : Mr.D.C.Mathur, Senior Advocate with ..... Appellant versus Mr.D.K. Mathur, Advocate STATE (THROUGH NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Inspector Rajeev Kumar, with Northern Range, Crime Branch + CRL.A. 81/2004 SHER SINGH Through : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate ..... Appellant versus with Mr.Lovekesh, Advocate GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Inspector Rajeev Kumar, with Northern Range, Crime Branch + CRL.A. 198/2004 ANIL KUMAR STATE Through : Mr. R.N. Mittal, Senior Advocate with ..... Appellant Ms. Suman Rani, Advocate versus Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Inspector Rajeev Kumar, Northern Range, Crime Branch. Crl.A. 54/2004, 81/2004 & 198/2004 Page ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI12h May, 2017 Judgment Reserved on Judgment Pronounced on ____December, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on 3rd January, 2018 + CRL.A. 54/2004 R.S. DAHIYA Through : Mr.D.C.Mathur, Senior Advocate with ..... Appellant versus Mr.D.K. Mathur, Advocate STATE (THROUGH NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Inspector Rajeev Kumar, with Northern Range, Crime Branch + CRL.A. 81/2004 SHER SINGH Through : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate ..... Appellant versus with Mr.Lovekesh, Advocate GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State Inspector Rajeev Kumar, with Northern Range, Crime Branch + CRL.A. 198/2004 ANIL KUMAR STATE Through : Mr. R.N. Mittal, Senior Advocate with ..... Appellant Ms. Suman Rani, Advocate versus Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State ..... Respondent with Inspector Rajeev Kumar, Northern Range, Crime Branch. Crl.A. 54/2004, 81/2004 & 198/2004 Page ...
Tag this Judgment!